Do you think that 20-20 cricket is only for youngsters?
By abhishek111
@abhishek111 (377)
India
May 12, 2009 7:14pm CST
This IPL has definitely shattered the prevailing myth that 20-20 cricket is only meant for youngsters. Looking at the performances of various players, it has been found that the top performers are mostly those who are in their thirites and certainly cannot be called youngsters. The way players like Hayden, Dravid, Kumble, Tendulkar, Gilchrist, Jayawardene, Nehra etc have performed, it is certailnle obvious that 20-20 is not meant for only youngsters. Actually all these players have proved that they are good players and they can play under all conditions and circumstances in all forms of the game.
1 response
@shail5554 (232)
• India
15 May 09
No it is not necessary that the 20-20 format is only for the youngsters. For playing in this format one should have a vast experience. Some examples are Hayden-leading run scorer in this season, the next one is Gilchrist,even Sachin and jaysurya are playing well
