When Will It Cease Being Bush/Cheney's Fault?

Whether Bush and Cheney was right or wrong, they cannot be blamed for everything.

So I guess you will start writing discussion about how Obama has run up the largest deficits in his first 100 day, 2 trillion dollars. I do not believe Bush/Cheney did that. It is amazing that you never like to speak about that. If deficits are bad, which they are then what Obama is doing is criminal. Under the Bush admin 75 cent of every dollar was funded, under Obama 50 cents of every dollar is funded. Let me guess you well some how blame that on Bush. You speak about Clinton's economy a lot and how bad Bush's economy was, well history says under Obama America will have a worse economy than Bush. Under Clinton federal spending never once topped 2 trillion dollars , his biggest budget was the 2000 fiscal budget of 1.9 trillion. Under Bush the largest budget was the 2008 fiscal budget of 3.1 trillion. Obama's 09 fiscal budget is 3.7 trillion.

Gew, the year isn't even half way over, and the economy is showing signs of getting better. If the economy starts to grow, then the deficit/debt will go down. If the banks pay back the TARP program there you will have about 700 billion to 1 trillion. So now you are down to 1.3 to 1 trillion dollars. All of the sudden his deficit is lower than Bush's, so there you go. Deficits are bad (unless you listented to D!ck Cheney who said that deficits are good, that is because they needed spend money to win an election) but sending the country into a depression is much worse, and it looks like Obama has adverted this. Under Clinton every dime was funded because of a great program called PayGo, but Bush didn't like this idea of funding spending programs/tax cuts, with bennifit/tax increases. So Bush just got rid of it, and our national debt went through the roof (and YES, that is Bush's fault). The reason that Obama's number is so high is because he has to save the country from the "Trickle Down" economic policy of George W. Bush that created the worse economy in 30 years. What you don't know about the historic trends is that they don't always prove to be accurate when it comes to the economy. Economic forcast are rarely correct, and these same experts that say that Obama's plan will fail are the same that said that Clinton's tax increase in 2003 would destroy our economy, and send it into a depression. They couldn't be more wrong, during the Clinton era our economy experiened the longest growth period in our national history. To use your numbers Gew, if the banks pay back the TARP program, like many want to, then his budget would be less than Bush's. But, I don't like to get into projections.