Star Trek The Movie

I don't care how you want a character as long as it was Cool. But if you'll ask me, i want Doctor Bones, Doctor Bones, calling Doctor Bones! Doctor Bones Doctor Bones, get up now! (get up now!) Yeah

It depends on the movie. If you you're talking about the original cast then it's totally Spock or Kirk. Without a doubt. If you are talking about XI then it's Bones. Karl Urban was fantastic as McCoy. He was possibly the most canon/best character in there. Kirk did end up being good toward the end, however I think Quinto!Spock needs to work on his act. He needs more Vulcan less Sylar. (I have never watched Heroes save for twice. I am also not clear on the character of Sylar since I only saw him a few times. But from what I saw...)

There's no doubt that those two casting choices were absolute coups in getting the ultimate replacement for great characters. The others are adequate as they have good sides, yet their characters have been changed too much in comparison to their counterparts from the late 60s. The only disappointments I might point out are the Spock-Uhura love affair and Nero's one-sided character - he was just a villain who just happened to be the only Romulan survivor with a massive mining ship with weapons comparable to a Romulan battlecruiser in the 24th century. Come on, even though Romulus was destroyed, there must be a fair thousands of other Romulans scattered throughout the Romulan Star Empire who could have a better potential as a villain than a damned miner who had little link to the old Spock. I meet, a vengeful Romulan diplomat who worked hard to gain trust with Starfleet only for them to fail to help them in their time of need would be a far better villain!