Lets have a challenge Free Market vs Government Ownership
By bobmnu
@bobmnu (8157)
United States
June 10, 2009 3:10pm CST
We have the perfect opportunity to try an experiment. Lets have GM and Chrysler build cars the way the government wants them built. Then let Ford build cars the consumer wants with no mileage requirement, no pollution controls and no safety equipment. All of that would be optional. GM and Chrysler could not receive any more money from the government and like Ford would have to borrow the money they would need from the private sector.
Who would win the sales contest? Neither company could sell the car for below the cost of producing the car but GM and Chrysler would not have to make a profit, while Ford would. What Say you on who would win and why.
1 person likes this
2 responses
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
11 Jun 09
Ford would win.
The Free Market will always outperform government entities.
In the case of manufacturing... the products that people want are the products that they buy.
These government made cars will not be what the people want... then there is the stigma that will be associated with a government made vehicle.
Reliability and quality will be diminished. The phrase "Good enough for government work" was coined for a reason.
@heathcliff (1415)
• United States
10 Jun 09
You are really hampering Ford's chances by making them run a profit where the other two do not, and that restriction seems to be opposed to your prior constraint of pouring no more money into GM and Chrysler. If you let the other two operate like money-sink-holes, there is no way Ford would be able to win your competition. If, however, you force the government run companies to operate in a normal business manner (just with an unusual owner), we migh have a race.
The Post Office beats the heck out of private shipping entities, so we know the government CAN compete in the free market. The big question seems to be: If Ford were allowed to make cars that did not have to live up to government guidelines, would they choose to do so? According to THEIR propaganda, Ford is committed to surpassing government regulations without being forced to meet guidelines. So this would be a good experiment to see if they are lying about that. The next question is: Would Americans buy cars that were stripped down in that way? If that's all we wanted to find that out, all we have to do is import some of those cheap Eastern European or Indian cars and see how they do.
Even in it's simplest form, your question is not about government ownership versus Free Market, but Public Ownership versus Private Ownership in a Free Market system. We certainly could try more companies run by the government forcing private run companies to keep up or perish. That type of competition would have to be more favorable to Free Market purists than government regulations of industry.
Ultimately this theoretical battle would probably see Ford losing simply because the government controls too many of the variables. Unless you're also suggesting Ford be allowed to operate with no minimum wage, no safety regulations, no taxes, and no limits on foreign sales.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
11 Jun 09
If the post office is so great, then why are the rates always increasing, and why are they wanting to reduce delivery days... hmmm?



