MJ's kids: aren't Michael's?
@incredibleDNA (1742)
Philippines
June 29, 2009 6:25am CST
Yes, i just read an article saying that Debbie Rowe, mom of MJ's two eldest kids, told the interviewer that she was artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor. Since MJ is really really close to kids, do you think that this would be true? Or Debbie Rowe just want some publicity and she is just somehow retaliate to MJ?
Oh well, share your Point of Views and let's just see what will happen next.
5 responses
@Foxxee (3650)
• United States
1 Jul 09
Actually, Michaels own family spoke out & has said that Rowe isn't the childrens mother either & Michael isn't the biological father, but he is their father. He raised them. People should leave this alone. He raised them. He was their father, that is all the children knew. Who cares whos the biological parents?
1 person likes this
@ds6413 (2070)
• United States
29 Jun 09
I have heard that his 2 oldest kids are not his biological children. I also heard the youngest is his biological child. I guess the only one who knew was him. I hope it won't be dragged out in a custody battle.Peoples true natures will be coming out due to his passing.
1 person likes this
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
1 Jul 09
being a father isn't just being responsible for 50% of the chromosomes swimming in one's body. it certainly makes good talk if michael jackson isn't the biological father of his kids. but it certainly puts nobility in his eccentricity. if michael jackson isn't the biological father then lo and behold! with the supposed to be fact of michael jackson's weird lifestyle tempered with the never changed talk that he was a devoted father (even if they say the kids aren't his own) then michael jackson is in heaven right now. and he certainly serves as a good example to some fathers i know...
@TrvlArrngr (4044)
• United States
29 Jun 09
Wow. I have not heard this yet. I will have to check it out. Thanks.






