Air Disasters Waiting To Happen
By skysuccess
@skysuccess (8857)
Singapore
July 19, 2009 10:09am CST
I just expected it as I read this article on the Daily Mail today and I just cannot help to conclude that we just cannot allow the airlines at their own whims and fancies to do their aircraft maintenance.
The very fact that these Airbus aircraft though are regarded to be the most technically advanced aircraft in the world is not immune to technical problems and flawed cabling which had been a very dogged issue with their competitor Boeing. Yet this article shocking revealed that these problems had been so comprehensively ignored by the airlines and aircraft manufacturers.
So, how can these be happening under the very noses of those who are responsible for the safety of thousands of passengers and crews? I just hope the the relevant authorities like the FAA and IATA will really pull up their socks and ensure some real maintenance and safety observances here.
Ref:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1200132/LIVE-SPECIAL-INVESTIGATION-The-series-mysterious-Airbus-330-accidents-culminating-tragic-loss-Air-France-Flight-447.html
1 response
@maximax8 (31042)
• United Kingdom
19 Jul 09
Having just read what the newspaper says about that type of plane I feel scared of flying. The photos were terrifying and the story of the flight that lost control for a while was awful. I am amazed that airlines are still using that model of aircraft. Technical problems like an autopilot going down are dangerous. Air France I would say is a quality airline so I wonder why it is using a model of plane that is so dangerous. Tourists book at plane ticket and don't choose the model of plane. I did used to think if I book with a quality airline I will be safe. The Airbus 300 is an accident waiting to happen and safety tests are necessary. Maybe in this recession airlines are not as through with safety testing as they used to be. I flew from London to Cape Town after a problem with fog. That flight was running 5 hours late because it was diverted to Manchester. At least that airline didn't land because of the fog and it went to to where it could be sure of a safe landing.
1 person likes this
@skysuccess (8857)
• Singapore
20 Jul 09
maximax8,
Well, I do not know about you, but when I had my first experience on the Airbus, I was very concern indeed because this plane only has 2 engines as compared to 4 with the Boeing. So, you can imagine my concerns and reactions when I was on that flight which was using Airbus. Fortunately, it was just a short one from Singapore to Bangkok which is a relatively short 2 hours flight. Where the concerned airline was actually testing it before they use it for the Kangaroo hop. I can assure you that I was just not going well with it - being a "guinea pig".
Most of the time, as travelers we do know what aircraft is being used on our flight to a particular destination, however, we just cannot choose them as Airbus is indeed making their presence much more dominant than Boeing. So, we can never really get to choose on short haul flights and especially when they are very heavily used by low cost airlines.
As you can gather from this article, I am just shocked that cross wiring which have been the predominant faults of the Boeing and MD's can be prevalent today on the popular and much used Airbus. I was like what is happening here? How could this be happening?
I do not know what is your opinion with regards to aircraft breaking apart in midair, but I am literally questioning the quality control and raw materials used in the construction of the aircraft. I would not be surprised if there is a lapse in the quality control here but sad to say, there will not be any telling soon enough to prevent another air disaster. So, until the authorities and neutral bodies can come up with some stringent measures and internal audits, there is just no way we can really have any answers to these spate of events. And until that day, each trip by air (evermore so with low cost airlines) will be no different from a game of Russian Roulette.



