Let's actually let the Free Market work... for once!

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
August 17, 2009 1:28am CST
Here in the US we talk about our free market economy. Some people talk about it in positive ways while others can't seem to find anything good about it. The problem is, we have never really let the free market work in our economy. Free Market is where everyone is free to market their goods and services as they see fit. When has that ever been the economic policy of the US, or any individual state? Instead of Free Market, we have had a pendullum swing between government protection of business owners and government protection of consumers. While there is nothing about Free Market Capitalism that precludes laws or government regulation, it does preclude protectionism. Our government passes laws that actually make fair competition illegal. Because of influence peddling and corruption, law makers will work to get bills past that make it impossible to compete with their buddy's business. On the other end of the pendullum swing, we have laws that require business to engage in unethical and unwise practices. The best example would be the laws requiring financial institutions to make loans with people who can't pay them back. Yes, they helped some people become proud homeowners, but they also drove the price of housing through the roof. There is also the points where the government has moved from mere regulation and lawmaking to actually controlling the market. An example of this would be the labor market. Free Market is where everyone is free to market their goods and services as they see fit. Most people seem to think that this only applies to employers, however, that is not true. When you enter the job market, you are literally putting the goods and services of your skills, education, experience and property on the market. Employers are the market for what you are offering. People complain about low wages and bad benefits packages. Why are wages and benefits packages so low? Because WE sell ourselves short, and because the government has skewed the market in favor of the consumer. Yes, there is a huge roll for the government to play here. Enforcing laws against assault and battery, slavery, abuse and other things are already on the books. All the positive aspects of "protectionist" laws are pretty much redundancies to existing laws. All the negatives just hurt the economy. Name one example of the abuses that lead to the rise of labor unions and the FDA that wasn't already breaking existing laws. You can't. The abuses made famous by Upton Sinclair in "The Jungle" were all examples of criminal acts. From petty theft to 1st degree murder and everythign in between. So why did they lead to all these government agencies and bureaucracies? Because enforcing existing laws isn't what makes government officials more powerful. Before we scrap the concept of Free Market Capitalism, let's at least give it a real shot. After all, it is the only system based solely on individual freedom and rights.
1 person likes this
4 responses
@urbandekay (18278)
17 Aug 09
Indeed, let the free market work by first removing your protectionist trade policies and compete on a level playing field with the rest of the world. all the best urban
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Aug 09
I'd be willing to do that, but that goes both ways. Remove the protectionist policies that favor the US, but also those that favor other countries.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Aug 09
Once agian your anti US bigotry is exposed by your own words. When our government passes laws that make it more expensive to produce things at home than it does to import them... that is protectionism that favors other nations.
@urbandekay (18278)
17 Aug 09
Thing is we don't operate such policies, US uses its strength to impose such all the best urban
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
18 Aug 09
I think small businesses are still able to participate in a free market system. Our business is subject to state and local licensing, which we have to pay for but, other than that, we're free to be as competitive as we want to be...which is why we're able to charge about $35 an hour less for labor than Harley Davidson and Sun Sports Cycle.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Aug 09
Yes, the closest we have ever come to real free market economy is small business at the local level. Imagine how much more stable our economy would be if everyone had the opportunity to offer goods and services to consumers without protectionism for either.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Aug 09
Only if the government refused to prosecute laws broken by employers and employees, or if the corrupt politicians took bribes to offer certain companies unfair advantages. Urbandekay, have you ever used your brain for somethign other than hating Americans?
@urbandekay (18278)
18 Aug 09
A genuinely free market would spell the end of many small businesses all the best urban
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
17 Aug 09
Dang straight, we as a country have never truly had a true free market society, but the free market is always blamed by the statist. Why do so many loath capitalism? Capitalism is just a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. What exactly is wrong with that? We hear about the abuses of a free market society, but abuses happen under a completely controlled economy also. One could say that all the abuses popularly ascribed to businessmen and to capitalism, were not caused by an unregulated economy or by a free market, but by government intervention into the economy. Some say that wealth is not spread fairly in a free market society, but only under a free market society can wealth be spread around freely. Wealth, in a free market, is achieved by a free, general, democratic vote by the sales and the purchases of every individual who takes part in the economic life of the country. Whenever you buy one product rather than another, you are voting for the success of some manufacturer. During such vote every man votes only on those matters which he is qualified to judge. He uses his own preferences, interests, and needs. No one has the power to decide for others or to substitute his judgment for theirs. No one has the power to appoint himself the voice of the public and to leave the public voiceless and disfranchised.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Aug 09
N4life... if it wasn't for government intervention no company could because monopolistic. In fact, the free market would take care of almost every problem you have ever written about monopolistic corporations. Government protectionist laws have done more to encourage monopolistic outcomes than anything else, ever.. yet it is the thing you advocate the most.
@N4life (851)
• United States
17 Aug 09
So you realy think that a "free market" which really, individually speaking, psychologically is impossible does not result in a fascist like mingling of govt and business when govt protections are not there? This is why conservative politicians abondoned the idea long ago. The ironic thing is to believe in a free market is to be even more trusting of govt then believing that corps need to have checks and balances.
@N4life (851)
• United States
17 Aug 09
In a true free market, which has been tried and failed, the monopolistic corporations appoint themselves voice of the public. Ever play monopoly? Every man votes on what is presented to him at the cheapest price at the expense of our culture and dignity. This kind of thinking is the biggest enemy to those wanting to make a living without being a slave to corps and government. Do you really trust government to run a "free market" any more than you trust them to run a national health care system?
@N4life (851)
• United States
17 Aug 09
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/05/the-predator-st.html
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
17 Aug 09
A website, what an intellegent post.
@N4life (851)
• United States
17 Aug 09
Thank You, be scared to read it because it just may not be what you want to see or think about.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Aug 09
N4, what I'd rather read is your views on what I've written.