United States of America
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
September 11, 2009 4:16pm CST
Yes, the word United is so important it is part of the name of our nation. But what are We the People supposed to be united in?
We are supposed to be United in love of country, support for the US Constitution, support and encouragement of each other, making the US the greatest country we can make it.
It does NOT mean we are United in how we choose to live, how we choose to love our country, how we choose to support the US Constitution, how we choose to support and encourage each other, or how we go about making the US the greatest country we can make it.
What it absolutely never, under any circumstances, for no reason, without any hesitation or excuses mean, support or allegience to any elected official, especially not the President of the United States. In fact, we aren't supposed to ever give that kind of allegience to any leader... of any nation... EVER.
2 people like this
2 responses
@stealthy (8181)
• United States
11 Sep 09
Just as the name says, it is the United States of America, meaning the individual States are united under one central government. Now how that government is run, etc. is very contenuous most of the time because of all of the differences in the peoples of the country. Unfortunately, the current ones in power want to take the country away from the ideas that have made it strong.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
12 Sep 09
I agree with everything you said, here, Ted. I'm not sure what you're getting at here but I'm sure it's something against the current President and Administration. I'm not saying YOU were one of them but I seem to recall lots of people on the right saying anyone who didn't support our most recent President unequivocally was unpatriotic and anti-American. They wanted to destroy the careers of The Dixie Chicks because their lead singer made a remark against Bush during a London concert. Now these same people don't think President Obama should be given the slightest bit of respect.
I'd never say you have to like him, support his policies or agree with anything he says or does. You certainly have every right to express your disagreement or disapproval. In MY opinion, that doesn't mean it's OK to be disruptive and disrespectful during a major speech before the full Congress. I've never liked it when ANY President is booed and jeered by members of Congress of either party and I sure don't think it's acceptable for someone to yell "Liar!" during a Presidential address. My grandkids both know better than to behave like that in middle school and these people are supposed to be our elected leaders!
Annie
@mdvarghese (1789)
• Bangalore, India
12 Sep 09
Hi..Annie
You well said it. The elected leaders in the most of the countries ( If they are in opposition)behave very badly.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
12 Sep 09
Well, being one who still likes the Dixie Chicks... ;~D
Yeah, I remember all the calls of "unpatriotic" and "unAmerican" toward people who didn't support Prs. Bush, and I admit to being caught up in it for a bit... but it's also what opened my eyes to the whole problem.
Neither blind obedience or blind opposition are good things.
Joe Wilson apologized for the remark. Not because of any pressure, nor because of any negative press.. he didn't even grand stand with it. He simply called up Prs. Obama and apologized. I think that speaks volumes itself.
He still maintains that Prs. Obama lied, but was sorry for the outburst. I think that was an important distinction that he has explained well.
I still haven't heard apologies for all the outbursts at Bush speeches, or from America's only Ex Marine, that spineless coward Murtha (spit). Their infractions of decorum were far more insidious than simply yelling a single word at the wrong time.
Mostly though, this article has to do with people who call for unity, but really mean "shut up and agree with me". We were never meant to be unified in opinion or politics, only for love of country and Constitution.



