The ACLU, a favorite whipping boy of Urban Legend and the Rumor Mill.
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
September 30, 2009 12:52pm CST
I hate to be the one coming out in defense of the ACLU, but I feel the need to set the record straight here. Heaven knows there is enough real dirt on that organization without resorting to myth, urban legend, rumor and/or just plain lies.
First of all, No, the ACLU has never shown any interest in banning crosses or any other religious symbols at military cemeteries. I don't know why they draw the line there, since they fight the use of religious involvement everywhere else, but I'm also glad they are willing to draw the line somewhere.
No, the ACLU has never fought for laws banning religious images on t-shirts or jewelry at public schools. Now, many school administrators cite pressure from the ACLU to back their own bans, but the fact is, the ACLU doesn't give a flying flip what a kids' t-shirt says.
On that note, the ACLU DID bring officials at Rappahannock Regional Jail in Virginia to court. The officials were censoring Bible references in the inmates' personal mail. This was a clear violation of the rights of both the inmates and those writing the letters. It also violated federal mail laws.
Please don't take this as an endorsement of the ACLU. I don't agree with much of their cases or their methods. I'm just saying that no group, no matter how vile, deserves to be falsely accused.
My advice to everyone on this subject is the same as my advice to people about religion or professions. If you want to learn about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, go ask a Mormon. If you want to learn what it's really like to be a paramedic, go ask a paramedic. If you want to learn what the ACLU is really up to, go ask a person who works for the ACLU.
Yes, that even means don't take my word for any of this... Go check things out for yourself.
2 people like this
1 response
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
1 Oct 09
I have not been a fan of the ACLU using their powerful and monied lawyers to intimidate school districts into erasing the word "Christmas" from winter vacation or to stop them from letting first grade children sing "Silent Night". These kinds of tactics seemed like bullying to me, but they pursue these cases in accordance with their interpretation of the Constitution. However, I did hope that this organization that proclaims its devotion to the Constitution would be just as active in pursuing other breaches of our liberties. Unfortunately, they don't seem to have much problem with most of the unconstitutional acts of this administration.
It's like free speech, you have to take the good with the bad. Okay, ACLU, we've seen your bad... where's the good?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
1 Oct 09
Exactly, which is why I said that I'm no fan of the ACLU. They use our freedoms and legal system as a weapon against us. I'm just pointing out that a lot of the things they are accused of doing aren't actually their doing.
They are still an organization that cares more about pushing a "progressive" agenda than either liberty or the US Constitution.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
1 Oct 09
As you point out, the ACLU hasn't sued over symbols on T-shirts, etc. The school districts that restrict religious jewelry or symbols do so out of a fear that the ACLU will come after them. The ACLU doesn't have to go after these cases, they have these entities, like schools, who are not in any financial shape to take on the ACLU, scared enough that they make these ridiculous rules on their own.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 09
Except that they have never gone after a school for allowing religious symbols on clothing. The fear is either unfounded, or just used as a pathetic excuse by cowards in the school system. Cowards who push their own anti religious agenda, but pass the "blame" on to the ACLU.
2 people like this



