CanadaFreePress: Networks Threatened Anchors About Speaking on Eligibility Issue
By debrakcarey
@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
October 19, 2009 2:56am CST
Remember Watergate?
An American President was ousted from office for trying to cover up a crime. Remember?
Now we have a President who refuses to produce proof of citizenship and spends millions to keep said proof locked up away from public scrutiny. The Constitution is the HIGHEST LAW of the land and Obama swore an oath to defend the Constitution. It says he must be a natural born citizen to serve as our president. He is covering up the evidence of his birth. In fact, it was the first thing he did when he took office as president...signed a presidential proclamatin declaring this proof off limits to the American People.
Read what Canada Free Press has to say:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373
For those of you who detest links, here is a bit of what it says.
News anchors were threatened with the end of their careers if they so much as spoke about ther controversy. One talk show host has come forward with documentation proving that threats were made towards him.
This is Canada Free Press guys, not WND. You supporters of Obama don't like that source, I know, So tell me why would Canada Free Press would bother with this if it weren't true? What possible reason do they have for this except that it is something that NEEDS to be known?
Please don't tell me I'm racist or that I should respect my president. I am not, and I won't ever is all I'll say to those sort of responses.
1 person likes this
7 responses
@thea09 (18305)
• Greece
19 Oct 09
Hi debra, wellI really have to respond here as you so nicely gave a synopsis of the dreadful link. My own take on this is can't you all just stop pondering on where someone was born, you could one day have a brilliant president who was born outside the country so it really shouldn't make any difference and to the outside world is just an issue about nothing except tedium. Now don't let the politcos slate me for saying that, and that I'm insulting the constitution, my opinion is that it shouldn't matter regarding anyone.
But the question that is interesting here is WHO threatened the news anchors, the white house bad guys or the networks which employ them. I thought freedom of speech was allowed over there.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Oct 09
Thanks for responding Thea...now I can post the link and hope this one takes. Drat myLot for how they handle these links! lol To answer you questions on the tediousness of standing by our Constitution. You see, it made us a great nation of free people when it was followed. It guarantees us things like that free speech, freedom of religion (beliefs, thoughts, even to be without religion) It also protects us from tyranny. A president must only be loyal to one country. Our forefathers knew this. As for who did the threatening, it appears to have been the networks. Wonder why they would do that? I do too! Now, forgive me while I try that link again:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373
@thea09 (18305)
• Greece
19 Oct 09
I understand your points about your constitution but wasn't it made initially by people from England and elsewehere who weren't born there - just a thought as not up on the origins of that one. But suppose a babe in arms was brought up in the US and parents and child are legal American citizens then why shouldn't that child be able to become president. I think too much fuss is made on that point completely.
I suppose the networks can stop their employees speaking on network time but in that case who put the pressure on the networks, or are they all pro Obamna?
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
19 Oct 09
BTW debra I had no problem opening your link from my email notification of this discussion. It seem that for some time now the problem/glitch must lie with the myLot site.
1 person likes this

@spalladino (17891)
• United States
19 Oct 09
Hi Debra. I did a little bit of searching on the net and what I found indicates that, yes, an investigation has been ongoing but what stood out in these reports is that everything they have uncovered allegedly happened in October of 2008, during the presidential campaign...they have nothing from 2009. So here is my opinion about this.
I do believe that many news organizations issued gag orders regarding the eligibility issue back in 2008. You can't have network news anchors, or guests on their shows, making unsubstantiated claims about a candidate for president during an election campaign without one shred of hard evidence to back it up. Any kind of claim attributed to a network that could effect the outcome of an election, especially if it turns out to be untrue, would leave the organization that allowed it to be made on the air, open to huge lawsuits.
I also have to wonder where the Woodward and Bernstein of today is if there was a conspiracy to keep the media silent? While network anchors have to answer to their superiors, there are thousands of blogs on the web, thousands of newspaper reporters who are watching their industry shrink to nothingness and who would sell their souls to get their hands on the Big Story of today. Other voices and other investigations are very obviously absent. Aside from the Canada Free Press and the Northeast Intelligence Network, which claims to be a group of professional investigators...a fact that can't be substantiated...no one else is in possession of evidence of gag orders. And where is current evidence that a gag order still exists? Talk radio is obviously not subject to a gag order. I listen to various conservatives daily and they talk about the eligibility issue from time to time. You can't say that they're being silenced because they're not.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Oct 09
You can't have network news anchors, or guests on their shows, making unsubstantiated claims about a candidate for president during an election campaign without one shred of hard evidence to back it up.
It happens all the time, spalladina. And as for the claims being unsubstantiated, if they are, that is the fault of a candidate and now president and those backing him. When this first came to light during the campaign...why didn't he put it to rest by giving up his documentation? McCain did. The fact that such pains were taken to cover this up in and of itself proves to me that there IS something to hide. It just makes me believe that those backing him, paying for his campaign knew he wasn't eligible and nipped any evidence proving that, in the bud. If you contemplate that, it's down right scary.
The networks weren't afraid of lawsuits when they allow people to come on the air lying about the birth certificate being destroyed by the state of Hawaii, were they? They're not concerned with lawsuits when they repeat the words of politicians calling citizens 'dangerous' and 'domestic terrorists' are they? And in my memory, the media used to be about honest debate. Talk show forums and editorial opinions have a long history of such. But now they're suddenly not debating this? And as for the world wide web...you are correct in that this is harder to control. But they're working on it. Lists being made by search engines and IP addresses being turned over to governments. Our own government now has hand in this, thanks to the Patriot Act.
It doesn't negate the proof, that only one or two have it. I've never understood that thinking. AS for talk radio not being subject to a gag order...LOL. The White House is behind a boycott of Glen Beck as we speak. And then there is the propaganda so many have bought into that conservative talk show hosts who DO mention this...are crazy...or worse.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Oct 09
"The White House is behind a boycott of Glen Beck as we speak."
What is the evidence to support this claim, debra? I know this had been blamed on former "Green Czar", Van Jones but that has been debunked. It was a group he'd been connected to in the past that had some connection to the boycott. This was two months ago so no matter what your "as we speak" claim isn't accurate.
Annie
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Oct 09
I guess what I am saying by that last statement is; there's more than one way to gag people than an outright order to do so. Just make them appear crazy or racists for talking about it?

@DavidReedy (2378)
• United States
19 Oct 09
Indeed, let us play devil's advocate and say that Obama is an-all American, born in the USA... then why hide the documentation? Obamites are quick to say, "that's his right, would you like someone prying into your life?!" etc., etc., but if you've got nothing to hide, for one, and for second, a politician is in "public life" so those ridiculous arguments just don't fly... Yeah, I think there's plenty to hide, and the American people have become apathetic and our government, right along with the corporacracy, and its voice, the media--are all completely corrupt. End of discussion, really.
DR...

@DavidReedy (2378)
• United States
20 Oct 09
LOL! The truth is, when I get on my soapbox it is quite often next to impossible to shut me up... But the fact is, what I truly meant by "end of discussion" is that the truth's so self-evident that it's absurd one should have to explain the obvious to others... Obamites, Bushites, McCainites, Clintonites, they are and all were the exact same things, people who decreed the ignorance and "bullying tactics" of critics while excusing doing the exact same thing for their prefered false-paradigm New World Order stooge.
dr...
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
20 Oct 09
I like that...end of discussion.
Unfortunately for me...I care to much.
People on myLot who support Obama or who are entirely optimistic like my friend up top....are Americans. I can't just let them go on being deceived. So, I will keep on pluggin along with this.
Until they come and get me and put me in one of those FEMA camps. 
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
19 Oct 09
The truth is finally starting to come out about our Usurper in Chief.
This is just one more nail in his coffin.
WND has been running this issue from the very beginning, and now finally others are beginning to take notice of the lies and coverups... and it is about time too.
Comrade 0bama's supporters are simply in denial.
They had no problem with McCain being called before Congress to prove is eligibility, but are all too willing to give the anointed one a pass.
Well, it is all starting to fall apart now, and I hope he is driven from the office he does not deserve very soon before he totally destroys America.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Oct 09
I wish I could say that this was surprising. Control is what this administration is all about and it has infiltrated the very institutions that the American people have for so long depended upon for truth. The press, used to be proud of their independence and the freedoms that allowed them to call out anyone who was breaking the law, even a president. Now the powerful muzzle the free speech of even journalists, failing their most important duty to inform.
This is the main reason the WH has declared war on Fox News. They can't control them, they can't dictate what they report and what opinions are expressed. It's the reason the WH is seeking more control of the internet, placing cookies on your computer if you visit a government website and data mining comments, links and emails from third party networks like Facebook, MySpace and Yahoo.
If someone doesn't challenge these abridgements of freedom soon, it will be too late. The thought police and the speech police are already out there.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
22 Oct 09
And myLot? perhaps? We did just go through a major glitch and nothing said by administration that I know of?
Forgive me, it's late and my mind is still on the Matrix movie comment I read a while back. 

@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
20 Oct 09
If that means it could be worse......
Where do you live solared?
And what makes you feel it is not as bad as it's made out to be? 
Where do you live solared?
And what makes you feel it is not as bad as it's made out to be? 
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
20 Oct 09
I haven't done a lot of research into the individuals who are behind the political parties finances...or behind the media's finances. It is enough that I see the very disturbing trends. Who is actually responsible really doesn't matter to me.
I do agree that BOTH parties are corrupt, both parties basically have the same agenda. And both parties are not listening to the public. We have nurtured a monster, fed it, love it, watched it grow....and it is about to turn on us!
@solared (1207)
• United States
20 Oct 09
I live in GA, an I mostly vote republican, but after this last election I did some real research an pretty much found that the same people are backing everyone behind the scenes, so it really dosen't matter who is elected, an the news will always be manipulated.
Our news outlets are not American owned anyways the investors or owners or all from overseas, dosen't matter whether you like CNN or Foxnews it's all bs when it comes to politics.
Also anyone who hate Rush Limbaugh dosen't realize he is being paid by the same people he rallies against behind the scenes, he was never gonna be a NFL owners, but he sure did bring the press to a story noone would have cared about otherwise.

@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
19 Oct 09
IMO it just shows that Obama's insidious evil tentacles can reach far and wide crossing borders. What, I wonder, is is the American and Canadian media getting out of their deal with the devil....money? As they have no soul to sell what could be their reward?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Oct 09
Canada Free Press is trying to expose the lies of our American dictator. And yes, I just called him a dictator! and I know I will be called a racist for it. I would refer any name callers to my What is Racism? post.
They have documentation of threats, threats designed to keep any controversy over Obama's citizenship from the American public. As of right now, they cannot control the world wide web, yet. But they ARE trying to do that as well. We now have a czar (presidential advisor) that monitors the use of the web by American citizens. Search engines reporting use and IP adresses to the governments of China is proof of that.
What is in it for those compliant with the cover up? It goes much deeper than mere money. POWER, I believe is what motivates them. Of course, money is power in most people's minds. So, I guess it may have something to do with it.
As to WHO is behind it...I am researching the Federal Reserve System and some of the documented history of this institution is down right scary! It points to a very rich and powerful group of elite that has been behind revolutions, coups and takeovers all in the name of ruling the entire world by economic means. All this goes much further than good old Barack Obama. And I believe that he's thinking he'll have a high place in what is to come...but only if he does what he is told.







