Does the Bible specifically teach about homosexuality?

United States
November 14, 2009 12:17am CST
If so where at and what does it say?
1 person likes this
3 responses
• United States
14 Nov 09
In the Catholic Bible, as far as I could see, there were two passage about it, but it wasn't "no marriage" or anything like that, these passages were pretty subtle, and as far as I could see it was not in the Gospels. There were so many ways that they could have been interpreted.
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Nov 09
I am not a Catholic now, and I think that homosexuals should have the right to marry, but I know I will be stoned by the Christians for saying it.
1 person likes this
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
16 Nov 09
Therefore God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature; and likewise also the males, leaving the natural use of the female, burned in their craving toward one another, males with males, commiting unseemliness and fully receiving in themselves the retribution of their error which was due. (Romans 1:26-27) Neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor effeminate nor homosexuals nor thieves nor the covetous, ... will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Cor. 6:9-10) The law is enacted not for the righteous but for the lawless and unruly, ... for fornicators, homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers,... (1 Tim. 1:9-10)
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
17 Nov 09
Correction, that is 1 Cor. 6:9 (not 1 Cor. 9)
1 person likes this
@2timothy (794)
• Philippines
17 Nov 09
The typological things in the Old Testament dispensation are shadows of the real things in the New Testament. The moral law (The Ten Commandments) holds true both in the Old and New, but the ordinances of the law like observances of days, dietary regulations, circumcision, and ritualistic sacrifices are abolished in the New.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Nov 09
It is considered an abomination for a jew to eat pork. But the word "abomination" means "a violation of ritual requirement." It did not mean that eating pork was immoral. In that same respect, you have to allow evolution to run its course and realize that the words "natural" and "unnatural" had meant "customary" and "uncustomary". That which is written in the bible does not apply to present day.
• United States
14 Nov 09
i have never heard of it. i don't read the bible much though.