Speaking In Tongues According to The Protestant Faith the Biblical Typology

@badfish (208)
United States
December 3, 2009 11:42pm CST
I found this very interesting and want to share to see what everyone thinks. In the New Testament the meaning of the Old testament becomes clear. The method used to connect the two "Testaments" is commonly called "typology". It has been defined as the establishment of historical connexions between certain events, persons or things in the Old testament and similar evants, persons or things in the New Testament. I.E. Jesus wondering in the Desert for 40 days with Israel in the Desert for 40 years. The Story of the Tower of Babel may serve as an illustration (Genesis 11:1-9). The Parallel to this story in the New Testament is the Story of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-13). For the Protestant Faith, these two stories compliment and Interpret each other and Jesus is the center for both. The Story of the Tower of Babel tells how man's disobedience and alienation from God ended in the disruption of human society and the inability of Men to understand each other. It told that if man is seperated from God, in revolt against God, he is also seperated from his neighbor and at odds with his neighbor. Peace and understanding among men depends upon thier relationship to God. But while the Old Testament tells this story negativly, describing the misunderstanding and disruption cause by disobedience and revolt against God, the New Testament tells the other side of the same problem. In the story of Pentecost we learn that people who came from different nationalities, people whose language differed so that they could not understand each other, came to understand each other through the power of the Holy Spirit. Once they were unitied with God, the disruption of the Tower of Babel was reversed. Language no longer seperated the crowd that was present at Pentecost. They could all understand the Apostle's preaching. They each felt themselves addressed in their own tongues, in their own languages. If this is true and it seems to this has revelance to the Phenomonon of Speaking in tongues. there are 2 types of speaking in tongues classified as: Xenoglossy, which is defined as Speaking in a natural language that was previously unknown to the speaker. Glossolalia, which is defined as speaking speach like syllables, often as part of a religious Practice. it is a material Phenomenon which has Physical and Psychological patterns that can be described. but not of a known living or dead language previously identified. and which if any or both is Biblically supported. and which of these is commonly practiced in modern churches.
2 responses
• Philippines
4 Dec 09
I think I could not say which of the two is commonly practised. Speaking in toungues is a gift of the Holy Spirit. I suppose, it is the Holy Spirit which determines which kind of gift to give. In our charismatic community, I hear both. Some speak like Chinese, some I could not truly sense. Our concern, 'though is that there has been no one who could interpret the tongues when unleashed. Sometimes, we wonder, are these truly the gifts from the Holy Spirit? Why could no one interpret the meaning?
@badfish (208)
• United States
4 Dec 09
That Is my point. most people who speak in Charismatic churches often can speak when ever they want to yet it is supposed to be as the Spirit sees fit. most studies find that most people are not speaking in a language at all. it seems to be a estatic state induced Phenomenon. that is also found practiced in religions like Hinuism. People that do not glorify Jesus or believe in Chritianity at all can do this. however if you speak in a language you have never learned before this is exactly what happend at pentecost. the other did not. I do not think both are actually gifts as Glossolalia has no real purpose, and can be done at the persons will other than the Spirit's. Not trying to judge anyone I am struggling with this isssue. and putting my thoughts out there
• Philippines
4 Dec 09
I also am trying to understand. If Jesus is not glorified by any tongues because no one could decipher the meaning, it possibly is not of the Holy Spirit. What is it's use if God is not glorified? I will pray for enlightenment. God just might give an answer. God bless you and yours
@badfish (208)
• United States
4 Dec 09
Thanks I go back and forth on this issue
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
4 Dec 09
I was an extreme skeptic of speaking in tongues. I felt it was only an emotional or mass hysteria effect caused by worshiping in a frenzied state. Than one day a woman gave a testimony in tongues and I understood every word she said but no one else seemed to. I didn't know if you understood it you were suppose to give interpretation at that time so I kept quiet and didn't say anything even when another woman said she wished their was someone was their to tell us what she had said. This wasn't the last time I have heard people speak in tongues and I knew what they were saying. From that moment on I decided it was something I had to have for myself and dug deeper into the scriptures and tarried for the holy spirit. I think both have a place in church, one (Glossolalia) is for your own personal talk between you and God and the second (Xenoglossy) is for unbelievers (it sure worked on me). Very good connection on the tower of babel. I hadn't thought of that before it could be that it was a metaphor for the turning point in mans spirituality and the book of acts was an awakening back to it on a large scale.
@badfish (208)
• United States
6 Dec 09
Could Be Literal??