At Copenhagen,The human being declared war against Earth at last.

China
December 22, 2009 2:05am CST
Copenhagen negotations have broken down.The human being declared war against Earth at last.It's finally proved that the elite group of human being is irresponsibility. Carbon dioxide emissions caused by human activities,causing glogal warming ,polar ice melting,sea level rise,coastal areas will be inundared.Permafrost melting ,Iceland ,Greenland disappeared,the Tibetan Plateau into a large quagmire..... We hope the Copenhagen negotiations let human being give up their greed.Work together.fight against climate change.But the result....... Don't tell me who won in the negotiation and who loses;Who is righteous and who is evil;Who is to assume more of the rich and who are less poor people assumed.In the face of climate change===the Humanbeing is win and the other party:Earth is lose.
1 person likes this
4 responses
@millertime (1394)
• United States
23 Dec 09
Don't worry, just because the New World Order Government didn't come up with something they could all sign, the world isn't going to end. The situation isn't as dire as a lot of people would believe if they only listen to one side of the story. Some countries will move toward lowering carbon emissions on their own. Others won't and there is nothing, not even a signature on any paper, that is going to make them. You say that humans win and the earth loses but there is no way that is the case. The earth will go on whether man is on it or not. We can only destroy ourselves, not the earth. But we are nowhere near anything like that. There is more and more science that is showing that the "global warming crisis" is not affected by man's activities anywhere near to the extent that the environmentalists have been claiming. As a matter of fact, the earth has been cooling for the last couple of years. The only bad thing is that the big meeting at Copenhagen that was supposed to be about cutting carbon emissions actually increased the carbon footprint by a pretty large amount, what with all the bigshots flying in on their private jets and all. It actually hurt the environment more than if they had never had it. But then again, that's how government works, even a "world government".
@jb78000 (15139)
27 Dec 09
where are you finding all this science millertime? anyway i agree with your last point - the whole thing turned out to be a complete waste of time and all the flights etc getting politicians over there was ridiculous.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
23 Dec 09
"Don't tell me who won in the negotiation and who loses;Who is righteous and who is evil;Who is to assume more of the rich and who are less poor people assumed.In the face of climate change===the Humanbeing is win and the other party:Earth is lose." Well, I guess no point in respnding to this is there then, you already have you r mind made up and aren't willing to concede any points or hear any other points of view. I'm sorry you have bought in to some very unsettled science, alarmism and a bunch of chalitans pushing junk movies, bad science and making a fortune doing it.
@jb78000 (15139)
27 Dec 09
ahem. i don't know about the poster but i am not interested in junk science. for starters i pay no attention to what that unemployed politician of yours burbles on about, but i think there might be a point in there.
@jb78000 (15139)
27 Dec 09
well it was a flop - as i pretty much expected. however i am not sure that taking such a negative view is necessary loop - things can still change and individual governments are finally beginning to take some steps (not as much as they might have said they will but something). i am not going to start saying this is the end of the world until it is.
• Indonesia
22 Dec 09
That is a sad story. If we declare war against nature, believe me, we will lose. I wonder why some countries are so selfish and greedy and if they are so stubborn, the archipelago country like mine will soon drown to the deepest sea.