GTA 4 Vs GTA San Andreas

Mexico
December 27, 2009 11:54am CST
I hear something about GTA San andreas, some people say that it have game options that GTA 4 doesn't have, it's true that? what do you think about this diference?
8 responses
• United States
28 Dec 09
San Andreas hands down. Graphics are the only thing that gta 4 has on san andreas, but san andreas had better gameplay, story, and it was more fun to play than gta 4. gta 4 seems clunky and akward. I would rather play saints row instead. I think gta 4 was a great disappointment and I wish they would have focused more on gameplay than on graphics.
1 person likes this
• United States
8 Feb 10
I don't think any gta game is very realistic. I just said it had better gameplay than gta 4. gta 4 didn't feel like an actual gta game.
• India
7 Feb 10
i dont agree with u buddy.gta 4 is much much better then san andreas including gameplay and story.san andreas is a lenghty game and it seems to be an unrealistic.gta 4 story line is superior as compared to all other titles.gta 4 is must play game.ya i know the customization of player is not that much flexible as in san andreas.we cant customize the hairstyle and there are not too much clothing option,we cant make tatto and all other stuff.even though i think gta 4 is better then san andreas.
@kidx1234 (56)
• United States
4 Jan 10
i would play GTA4 because it has online and a better story line the only thing GTA san andreas has over it is the two player mode and that isn't very good only if your really board and a friend is over that it is good
1 person likes this
@Java09 (3075)
• United States
27 Dec 09
GTA4 for the pc is definately better than San Andreas,which is for the ps2.GTA4 has more and better graphics,of corse.It's realistic people and the scenery is real.San Andreas is cartoon looking.I know because I have the whole series.GTA$ has much better options than San Andreas.
@Java09 (3075)
• United States
5 Jan 10
Well now I like San Andreas better.I change my answer,because GTA4 is too complicated to get started on the PC.San Andreas is so simple to play on the pc.Why did they make GTA4 so hard to get started.It does suck.
• Mexico
5 Jan 10
yea it's true, they prefered to improve the graphics quality and let other things in second plane
• Philippines
3 Mar 10
Oh yes. Even though I enjoyed GTA IV a lot, I agree that GTA IV is so hard to start on the PC. I was already complaining on my own "Why did they make it so hard to install? I've already bought an original game which is like a chunk of my salary and here it goes making it hard for me! And dang that Service Pack 3!"
@wizteen (502)
• India
31 Dec 09
i havent played gta4 but my friends who played it told me that this game is far superior in terms of graphics from san andreas. and more realistic from san andreas, but the gameplay is longer and more enjoyable in san andreas. lots of extra missions and most of all there are planes in san andreas and not in gta. the jet plan and the others were the main reason why i liked gta the most.
1 person likes this
• United States
30 Dec 09
They are both pretty good but i prefer vice city.
1 person likes this
• India
3 Jun 10
gta4 is far better than sanandreas also resource sucker
@kooltiger (848)
• Pakistan
19 Feb 10
i have not played gta 4 but i played for once and and i liked that stunt when we drive a car fast and hits something, the person smashes out of the screen and fells on the road....
• Philippines
26 Feb 10
Well, judging to the both games. I rather liked the San Andreas because of the gameplay and lifespan of the game. It takes me 9 months to finish it despite of side missions. On the other hand GTA 4 is more graphic oriented than gameplay oriented. You can finish it in 2 weeks or 4 days because of short missions and lack of side missions of SA. I'm also irritated that the Rockstar removed some cool features from the beta like banking, flying and parachute(which is necessary).