Why all the secrets?

United States
January 6, 2010 11:46am CST
Obama and teh dems in washington have agreed to continue the healthcare debate.....behind closed doors. SO much for a "new" transparacy in our government and how it works. This is an important bill that will effect ALL of us. So don't we have a right to know what is being discussed and what is being agreed too not only as the whole process plays out but also BEFORE it goes for a vote so we have a chance to have our say on wether we even want this "plan" they come up with or not? Why are we getting purposely getting left out of the loop on this one? What are they hiding? What don't they want us to know til it is too late? What are your thoughts on the "secret" healthcare talks?
2 people like this
11 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
6 Jan 10
It's disgusting and I'm sick of people defending these crooks. I don't know how people can so blindly support a bill they know nothing about and politicians who make it their mission to keep their own constituents in the dark. You'd think there would be more anger after Obama lied through his teeth about televising this on CSPAN, but his supporters just don't care. Sure, he lied. Sure, his transparency was a joke, but hey, he's cool and insults Bush a lot so I'm sure it'll work out. My thoughts on the "secret" healthcare talks is simple. They wouldn't be secret if it were something good. Bills wouldn't be over 2,000 pages long if they weren't trying to hide what's on page 1,632. I know most people just don't care enough to see what our politicians are doing, but for those of us that do care, we should have unfettered access to EVERYTHING discussed regarding the bills that will affect us with the sole exception of things that would compromise national security.
1 person likes this
• United States
6 Jan 10
You supported the PATRIOT Act, didn't you? Bush and his minions pulled out this huge, unreadable bill, told Congress "if you do not vote Aye on this I will tell your constituents you're unpatriotic and destroy your political career" and demanded an up-or-down vote on it. And if you've ever tried to read the PATRIOT Act you'll see what a really disgusting bill is: most of it is "In line 3 of the fifth paragraph of chapter 6, 18 US Code 405, strike the word "not." So now you've got to dig out 18 USC 405, find chapter 6, and go to line 3 of the fifth paragraph to find that Bush wants "police will not have the authority to kick down your door at three in the morning" changed to "police will have the authority." (Which also explains why the PATRIOT Act is 350 pages long instead of 2500 pages long--the meat of the Act is in the 108 sections of the US Code the PATRIOT Act amends.)
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
6 Jan 10
"You supported the PATRIOT Act, didn't you?" No, I didn't. The PATRIOT Act was a piece of unconstitutional garbage which Obama ALSO supports and wants to EXTEND. So now that your crap assumption and "Bush did it too" garbage is out of the way, go ahead and try to tell me how I'm wrong.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
6 Jan 10
ROFL!!! someone programmed jmowreader pretty good didn't they.......typical canned, statist response.
2 people like this
@mzz663 (2772)
• United States
6 Jan 10
The secret healthcare talks aren't the only thing being discussed behind closed doors. They want to be able to make a decision that will benefit them more than us, not something that is good for us. As long as everyone just goes along with the gov't does and lets them do it, they will be the ones that come out on top, not the citizens, the way it was meant to be.
1 person likes this
• United States
7 Jan 10
I agree. THey don't want us to know how bad the deal is until it is too late for us to do anything about it. If it was a great bill that would actually help us the average person they would let us see it and know what is going on.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
6 Jan 10
When they denied c-span I couldn't help remembering how transparency was supposed to be the ruling force for the dems.. part of the change we could depend on.. changes alright, mostly for benefiting the far left of the democratic party.
• United States
6 Jan 10
Benefits strengthening the democratic party and at the same time making government morph into even more huGe and more powerful government.. and what a boon! all paid for with taxpayer (free) money!
• United States
7 Jan 10
there has not been a lot of transparecny in this administration or congress. They have just paid lip service to it and then continued with business as usual.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
7 Jan 10
We are slowly learning that the Obama's are nothing more that the Chciago Political machine working in Washington. Say what ever you have to say to get elected and then do what ever you have to do to stay in power.
• United States
7 Jan 10
For all their talk.....they are not better than Bush and his Admin. Neither really wants transparancy and both just want the american public to sit and take whatever they dish out...no questions or comments allowed.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
6 Jan 10
Actually President Obama had nothing to do with this agreement about how to complete the health care debate. I don't THINK the details of the format for these meetings have been finalized yet so there's a possibility it may be in part televised on C-SPAN. However they do it, they will be far from "secret" talks since I've heard assurances there will be frequent updates made public and put online. They'll first be discussing the House bill, which has been online for several months now. Any changes to either version will be made public. Anyway, before whatever they come up with comes up for a vote for final passage it will be debated and will be available online. I just wanted to add that, although I know I won't be met with much agreement here on myLot, I truly believe the Democrats' hands were forced in this. The Republicans had publicly stated their determination to defeat ANY bill; Demint spoke of it being the President's "Waterloo" and proclaimed it would bring him down and Gregg wrote an entire "How To" newsletter which was followed to the letter to block and delay the bill. I'm not going to argue the point but I think the President reached out to the Republicans from the beginning and the Senate Finance Committee wasted weeks trying to appease just ONE member of the opposition and she's not going to vote for final passage anyway. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
7 Jan 10
"there's a possibility it may be in part televised on C-SPAN" LOL, yeah, there's also a possibility that Obama will dress like a chicken and dance in front of the White House, but that's no more likely to happen than any of their backroom dealings being televised on C-SPAN. When Gibbs was asked about Obama's promise the other day he flat out refused to answer the question. "I've heard assurances there will be frequent updates made public and put online." I have to hand it to you Annie, you sure are a true believer. Do you still believe Obama's assurances regarding lobbyists, transparency, C-SPAN, and the round table with doctors and insurance companies? "I truly believe the Democrats' hands were forced in this." How EXACTLY were Democrats FORCED to hide their negotiations from the public. We'll pretend for a moment that Republicans would have made the debate impossible somehow if they were not shut out. How does that force the Democrats to not allow C-SPAN cameras to watch them in their closed door deals and bribes? "the Senate Finance Committee wasted weeks trying to appease just ONE member of the opposition" I know, they must be so angry that she couldn't be bought with a $300,000,000 bribe like Nelson and Landrieu. "In fact, if he really meant it, he would threaten to veto any bill unless the debate on it was done publicly." Come on X. He already threatened, excuse me, PROMISED to veto bills loaded with earmarks, while he has basically laughed (or had Gibbs do the laughing) at Republicans who call on him to keep his promise regarding bills with thousands of earmarks. What I'm saying is that talk is cheap. Obama just tells people what they want to hear.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Jan 10
I do hold them responsable, all of congress. All the oposition to each other is nothing more than political theater. The dems want to look like heros, the republicans want to look like genuine heartfelt people's oposition....BOTH are full of shytte. But it doesn't make the crime of the comgressional majority leadership of conducting their business in secret any less loathsome...it's wrong...period. YOu and I both know damn well nothing good is going on behind those doors and that none of it has anythng to do with being kind hearted and offering every american the ability to pay for their healthcare. If Obama had a spine though he would stand up to the dictateress and refuse to take part in any further discusions on it untill the process is opened as he promised.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Jan 10
In fact, if he really meant it, he would threaten to veto any bill unless the debate on it was done publicly.
• United States
8 Jan 10
If things are done behind closed doors, how can anyone thing anything but that something is up and it's not going to may us very happy. People do shameful things in the dark or behind closed doors. If what is being done is honorable, do it in the open.
• United States
8 Jan 10
exactly. which means they don't have honorable intentions. therefore we should be keeping a closer eye one them.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
7 Jan 10
This bill is so good they want it to be a surprise. My question is if there is so much support for health care reform then why does it have to be done in secret? Wouldn't you want let everyone see how this crowning achievement of success was created? The secrecy of this bill tell me that the people of Washington D.C knows that this bill is not popular but they have the numbers. So they will just shove this bill right down the throats of everyone.
• United States
7 Jan 10
yep. They know we would scream, rant and rave if we knew so they are going to wait to let us know about it until it is voted on and passes....too late for us to do anything about it.
1 person likes this
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
6 Jan 10
Are you really surprised, though? If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. They don't want people to know about the bill, because if we actually can see what's going on, it may decrease the chances of them being elected after they cram it down our throats - and I'm fully convinced that jamming it down our throats is what they plan to do. The best lie ever told was "change".
• United States
7 Jan 10
I agree. I fully exspect not to fully know what is in the bill untill after it is voted on and too late to do anything about. It will be crammed down our throats wether we like it or not. Which is bad for us. And I hope costs ALL of them their jobs come re-election.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
6 Jan 10
It's unconstitutional, I believe. One reporter who actually had some b$lls asked Pelosi about it and she was just incredulous. Said something about a lot of things were promised in the campaign and then trailed off. Time to vote them out!! I hope people don't forget all these offenses against them, all the misrepresentation and the disdain they have for us. We need to hold onto these feelings until November, at least!
• United States
7 Jan 10
I agree. Vote them out and get term limits on their butts. This healthcare bill has nothing to do with "national" security so it should be open and I mean completely open for the american people to see the WHOLE process.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
9 Jan 10
This bill is going to effect all of us, so we should know what is in it before it is passed. Because it is being discussed behind closed doors, without us or the other party knowing what's being decided, one can only think the worst. The worst is probably what is happening and why we are being left out of the loop. I would think, "too late," is exactly what they have in mind.
@1denny (34)
• United States
6 Jan 10
Hi lilwonders456, I'll try not to bash too much cause I didn't vote for Obama. The proposed health care plan forces people to purchase something whether they want it or not. It makes a mockery of our so-called democracy and our constitution. Obama's ratings are falling more quickly than previous "failed Presidents". I use that description because never before has the American way of life been threatened as it is today. We can not fear the government and consider ourselves a free nation. So we move toward socialism. Less choices we can make for ourselves. The problem with socialism is we will run out of other peoples money that socialism requires to function successfully, if there is such a thing. I guess they had to close the doors, or we might know more than they want us to know.
• United States
7 Jan 10
"Socialism is great....until you run out of other peoples' money". Then when it is "your" money.....socialism sucks. LOL