Washington just doesn't get it!
By dragon54u
@dragon54u (31633)
United States
February 3, 2010 2:48pm CST
Mr. Obama made a speech where he told senators to turn off their tvs and radios and get out among the people. This was good! But he went on to say:
"That's part of what the American people are just sick of," Obama said of political coverage. "Because they just don't care. ... They just want to know, 'Are you delivering for me?'"
We don't care?! We didn't used to care and that was the problem. Now we care what's going on and want to be involved and our president thinks we don't care about political coverage.
When are they going to wake up? One problem, I've heard, is that the president is surrounded by butt kissers who don't disagree with him, who tell him how great he's doing and insulate him from how the people really feel. I wish we could get Mr. Obama to (safely) spend one day working in an average job such as a grocery store where nobody knew who he was and he could hear what people really say about Washington.
Do you think it would make a difference?
2 people like this
7 responses
@Hatley (163772)
• Garden Grove, California
3 Feb 10
hi dragon oh yes really we should get the whole damned congress to working in the common persons jobs doing what we all have to do, and let them live on what they earn, then maybe congress and President Obama would really know what we want and think and need. Let him and all the politicians lose jobs and run around trying to get a new job,then Obama and all of the fat cats would know what we really think and feel and need. walk in our moccasins for a week or two President and you will really know what we think and want.Oh I am sure it would make a big difference. People with plenty of money do not know beans about what we think or want or feel and few of them give a damn either.


2 people like this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
3 Feb 10
This administration has very few people who have actually held a real job or had to meet a payroll, the lowest number of any administration in history.
I'd love it if we could march up there and physically kick their butts, hand them each a broom or rake and force them on park duty for minimum wage for at least a week. They'd have to find their own accommodations, no going back to their cushy houses, and buy their own food.
2 people like this
@Hatley (163772)
• Garden Grove, California
4 Feb 10
I would love to see that, and they just might get the idea that
we want to be heard and need to be heard. I really think Obama
started out alright but has caved in to so many of the ones inCongress. but the whole thing is we have not had any presidents or members of congress for ages who knew just what it is like to work at a real job where you actually get dirt under your fingernails and work hard for paychecks that are not always adequate. as long as we elect wealthy people who do not have the slightest idea of what we the real people in this country want or need we will not really get heard.sad but true as far as I can see, Dragon.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
3 Feb 10
It is very simple. They were happier when the American public ignored them and let them do whatever they wanted.
So basically Obama is telling them...go out there..glad hand them...make them thnk you are listening and care..do whatever you have to do to make them go back to sleep again so we can go back to business as usual. Basically throw the dog a bone so it will shut up.
We the public are very inconvient for them right now. So they need to get us focused on other things so they can do what they want.
THey know we are ticked off. They know we are sick of them. they don't care as long as they get their way.
Obama was right when he said the american public is running out of patience with them and that they have a "deficit of trust" with the american public.
Congress has an approval rating of 25%. It has been that low for years. They have not cared to improve it. COngress cares about their approval rating about as much as Bush did...which means not at all.
What I did not like is when Obama told them to "make unpopular decision". Don't be scared to make decisions that most people don't agree with. Well that is what we are ticked about. That they are not listening to the people and are doing wht they want instead of what we want. We pay them to represent our wishes....not theirs.
Continuing to ignore us is going to cost most of them their jobs. But I guess Obama does not care if they loose their jobs...as long as he gets his agenda done.
2 people like this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
3 Feb 10
It's a sorry thing to say but I think this is going to be the most troubled administration in decades. As long as our president doesn't listen to the people he's going to have a lot of trouble. The more he spits in our faces, the angrier we will get and the less he'll be able to do. It's a shame. He had such promise if he would have just been in it to serve the country and not himself--same with the representatives.
Actually, Mr. Obama's awakening of the people might just save the country. He may be a blessing in disguise.
2 people like this
@millertime (1394)
• United States
5 Feb 10
I was going to post a separate comment but after reading your's lilwonders, I have to post here because I agree totally with your assessment, especially the first paragraph. Obama and the liberal left are very unhappy that the population has become aware of their shenanigans and are starting to speak out against them. They would like nothing better than to have us all go back to sleep and ignore them, but I don't think that's going to happen as long as they keep steering us down the path to destruction.
And make no mistake, Obama was telling them to go and try and convince the American public that they are going to listen to us, but they will be lying. They have no intention of listening to anything we have to say, they just want to pacify everyone and then they will continue to spend money they don't have and put us further and further in debt.
The only way we will make them hear us is through our votes. The Massachusetts election made them take notice, but not enough to make them change course. Maybe a few of the more moderate democrats will heed the warning but the radical left will not, so we'll just have to vote them out of office next November. We can't be deterred or swayed by their lies and you know they will try their best to lie their way back into office. We need to get rid of all the "career politicians" and elect more people like Scott Brown. Hopefully, there are some honest people willing to run for office to do good instead of for all the wrong reasons.
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
3 Feb 10
I really do not think it would make much of a difference. I think Obama's ego would not allow him to really care what the people thought. That is the danger of having a president who is a narcissist and who will not budge from his own personal agenda.
2 people like this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
4 Feb 10
He might budge if we rein in our reps and get control of them once again. At least the nation has awakened to how we've been hoodwinked for decades.
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
3 Feb 10
He is a slow learner who doesn't have a clue about what the people really want. I doubt a couple of days in the real world would clue him in any better. He would still be looking down his nose at the disadvantaged and seeing them only as dummies who can potentially give votes to keep his yea-sayers in office long enough for him to destroy America.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
4 Feb 10
Well then maybe it would take a year and maybe it would never make a difference. The point is, we have to start voting for people for their real qualities not because they blind us with charisma or they are good looking or make promises. I hope we learn something from this, if there is still an America by 2012.
2 people like this
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
4 Feb 10
I'm looking forward to November when it's likely liberals will be voted out of Congress by droves and the new majority will be able to block the assinine liberal legislation, maybe even to reverse some of the stuff that has already passed.
1 person likes this
@bellis716 (4799)
• United States
4 Feb 10
No, I don't think that he would pay any attention. He has his own agenda and is going to do his best to push it through no matter what the general public wants.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
4 Feb 10
He and the prez before him have violated the Constitution and we let them get away with it. We're waking up and if he doesn't straighten up he could find himself impeached, as the president before him should have been.
@laura_lmaxi (678)
• United States
4 Feb 10
Here is the problem, we let politicians get away with so much before, because the economy was good, so we automatically assumed " well they are just idiots and they can't get anything right. Now that the economy is bad we turn to the government, but what happen is that we have put in the past a lot of people that don't know what they are doing, now it is even worst, people only care when they are going through bad times, and this is a shame, because the government should perform as it is expected, and forget about power and money, they are there to serve to people, and to take good decisions for us.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
4 Feb 10
"the economy is bad we turn to the government"--why are we turning to the government?! What happened to our independence? The constitution assigned the government the task of protecting the country and the constitution and everything else was supposed to be up to the people and the states. We've slowly given our power to Washington over the past hundred years and now we have to take it back--most of all, we have to grow a spine and take care of ourselves, not rely on the government to be our nanny. We've now seen what that does.
@laura_lmaxi (678)
• United States
4 Feb 10
Exactly I agree, we as a country we have to demand that the things in Washington are managed with professionalism and intelligence. We should demand punishment for corrupted people and punishment for the incompetent people that have made the bad choices that have put us in the horrible economic situation that we are now. We should as a country realize that we are powerful as people. We should supervise and have the power to take those people out of there whenever we think they are disappointed or embarrassing us.
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85137)
• Shingle Springs, California
4 Feb 10
I'm with Hatley. Not just the President, but the VP, and everybody in Congress, and every appointed official including the Supreme Court justices up in their ivory tower. They are all out of touch and somehow we need to get them back INTO touch.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
4 Feb 10
I'm convinced we need to go back to the Constitution. It assigned the Federal government the duty of protecting the country and the constitution and the rest of the governing was up to the states, for the most part. We've let Washington take away our freedoms and free choice for a hundred years now, because we wanted security without sacrifice. We wanted comfort without spending our own money, safety without putting ourselves in harm's way. We wanted to help the poor without getting our hands dirty or making personal contributions. So we let Washington control us and tax us and push us around in order to have entitlement programs. We couldn't be bothered with out old ones so we accepted social security and medicare and farmed them out to nursing homes. I could go on and one but we need to take back our power. First through the voting booth--if we have balls enough to face life without government subsidies--and if that doesn't work, through active rebellion.
1 person likes this





