61% of Americans want a do-over on health care - Say scrap current proposals

@Rollo1 (16676)
Boston, Massachusetts
February 11, 2010 11:58am CST
A new Rasmussen poll found that 61% of voters want Congress to scrap the existing health care bills and start over from scratch. But they don't trust the current Congress to craft the new plan. 54% of voters polled want Congress to wait until after the mid-term elections and new congressional representatives have been chosen to start working on health care reform. 63% of voters feel that it would be better for the country if most incumbents in Congress were defeated and replaced. Do you want Congress to work on the existing plans or would you rather they start over? Do you think that waiting until the voters have a chance to choose new representatives is the best way to make sure that Congress executes the will of the people rather than doing what they want to do despite the wishes of the American voters?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
12 Feb 10
I guess you're saying this November's elections will reflect "the will of the people" but the 2008 elections were meaningless? We can argue back and forth into infinity over which polls are the most accurate but one thing is fairly certain - the Rasmussen Poll is almost always slanted to the right and is worded so it supports the talking points from Fox News and right-wing talk radio. I think we all know "scrap the current plans" and "wait until after November's elections" is simply code for "Let's forget about health care reform for another decade or two". I would like to see Congress - both parties of Congress - get together and try to work out a compromise with both parties knowing from the start that they're not going to get everything they want and that there will be some things included they're not 100% thrilled about. Whether they use the bills already passed in the House and Senate as starting points for a discussion or they sit down with a blank sheet of paper (or empty notebook!). Let's have it on TV, as the President has suggested, and let the chips fall where they may for both sides. The number of people currently suffering from a potentially deadly disease without insurance or adequate insurance doesn't make up a majority of our population but those people STILL matter! Annie
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
12 Feb 10
The Democrats have held a majority in Congress since 2006, so it wasn't the 2008 elections that handed it to them. Obama did win in 2008 but a large number of those who voted for him are now disenchanted because of his failure to keep his promises and his disastrous policies. And no, they aren't disenchanted because he didn't get health care reform passed. I have seen you accuse Rasmussen of being some branch of Fox News but this simply isn't true. You can cast aspersions on their polling but in 2008, Rasmussen came in #1 for accuracy amongst all polls. Fox was at the #10 spot and some big names were near the bottom, like Gallup at #17 and Newsweek at #20. You can't argue with accuracy. Here are some of the questions and the results: * Generally speaking, do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose the health care reform plan proposed by President Obama and the congressional Democrats? 19% strongly favor 20% somewhat favor 10% somewhat oppose 48% strongly oppose and, of course, 4% had no opinion * Is it better to build on the health care plan that has been working its way through the House and Senate, or should Congress scrap that plan and start all over again? 28% Build on the health care plan that has been working its way through the House & Senate 61% Congress should scrap that plan and start all over again 11% Not sure * Should Congress pass health care reform before the mid-term elections or should it wait until voters select new members of Congress this November? 35% Congress should pass health care reform before the mid-term elections 54% It should wait until voters select new members of Congress this November 11% Not sure Those questions look straightforward to me with lots of choices given to respondents to choose from. I can't see any slanting. I realize that somehow the idea of people languishing in the streets from lack of health insurance is the emotional appeal that is supposed to trump all other arguments, but we still have a representative form of democracy, and the will of the people is still the deciding factor.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
12 Feb 10
The funny thing with polls, like focus groups etc they can show any out come you want. The WH says that 60% of Americans want them to continue. I find this VERY hard to believe. I think most people want reform but not what they are proposing. I agree reform is needed but I think we need it in torte, portability. And I am vehemently against requiring citizens to purchase anything.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
12 Feb 10
It may be that a majority wants reform, they just don't want this reform. I totally agree that they cannot require private citizens to purchase anything.
• United States
11 Feb 10
I would like them to start over. I have just finished sending an email to my elected officials telling that! Here is the link where you can send a message to your elected officials: : http://responsiblehealthreform.com/take-action
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
12 Feb 10
They should start over and I also think that this Congress has lost the confidence of the voters, so I would prefer they wait until after the elections. Thanks for providing the link.
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
11 Feb 10
I would rather wait till we throw out the incumbents (hopefully) and then start in on it. I don't think the system needs a complete overhaul but there are people that need and can't get health insurance or have chronic conditions that are excluded (like me). They should concentrate on that, plus allow us to buy insurance across state lines and it wouldn't cost as much while fixing what really needs to be fixed. The main reason it's so expensive to go to a doctor, I think, is the high price of malpractice insurance. We need some tort reform, too, because people will sue their docs over the least little thing.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
11 Feb 10
That seems a balanced perspective with achievable goals. I think that most voters would be in favor of reforms that held down costs while providing for those who, for whatever reason, are unable to get the insurance they need. What they worry about is the government taking over health care entirely. Trial attorneys are the big lobbying force that fights malpractice reform and tort reform. Coincidentally, they are big financial donors to many Democratic candidates.
• United States
12 Feb 10
I would have to agree. There is not much to like either bill. It would be better to scrap it and start over.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
12 Feb 10
Neither bill is going to make it through both houses. The bills are thousands of pages long, if they add enough amendments and changes to make everyone happy, how long would the end bill be? I agree, start over.