Mandate, Provide, and Promote
By gewcew23
@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
March 25, 2010 4:12pm CST
If I give a starving man a sandwich I am providing.
If I encourage others to give the starving man a sandwich I am promoting.
If I force feed a starving man a sandwich I am mandating.
These words are all different. The Federal government does not have the power to mandate. Now the Federal government can provide or promote, but not mandate. State governments can mandate, and the people that live in those states can leave those states. Though the option to leave one country and go to another country can be very difficult.
The framers of the Constitution recognize this. This is why the newly created Federal government was given specific powers, and from the words of James Madison who wrote the Constitution they are few and well defined. The Tenth amendment was added to explain who has the the rest of the power.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
26 Mar 10
So what next...am I going to be forced to go to the doctor for a yearly physical or the government will come and get me?
You are right about the difference between the three...but congress does not care.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
26 Mar 10
Which means they can "mandate" my whole life. This needs to get nipped in the butt NOW.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
26 Mar 10
Hey there gewcew, please take note because I think you missed it when I agreed with you the last time in a discussion that's probably on page 9 by now. I do agree with you about the mandate. I have been against that from the start because it attempts to step on state's rights.




