NJ Principal Asks Parents To Ban Social Networking

@laglen (19759)
United States
April 29, 2010 8:14am CST
http://wcbstv.com/technology/facebook.social.networking.2.1662565.html RIDGEWOOD, N.J. (CBS) ? [Click to zoom.] Click to enlarge 1 of 1 Anthony Orsini, the principal at Benjamin Franklin Middle School in Ridgewood, sent out an e-mail Wednesday morning asking parents to help him get all of his students off social networks and keep careful track of their text messages. (File) Dan Kitwood/Getty Images Close numSlides of totalImages Related Slideshows Celebs Who Lean To The Right Celebrities On Twitter 2010 Celebrity Deaths Shocking Celebrity Suicides Celebrity Real Names...Revealed! Best Picture Blunders Celebrity Cougars & 'Manthers' Megan Fox -- Then & Now Jessica Simpson: Then & Now World's Most Useless Facts Related Stories * NY Senator Seeks Privacy Guidelines For Websites (4/26/2010) * Facebook Revamps User Profiles To Play Up Pages (4/19/2010) * Couple Robbed, Blame Facebook Status Update (3/25/2010) * Tampa's Mystery Monkey Has Its Own Facebook Page (3/24/2010) * NJ H.S. Players Benched After FB Postings (3/4/2010) A controversial proposal has students horrified at a Bergen County middle school on Wednesday. The principal is asking parents to join a voluntary ban on social networking. Eighth grader Ali Feinberg told CBS 2 she uses her iPhone to check her Facebook account "a lot" and some of her friends said the same. Now all have to talk to their parents about getting off the popular social network. It won't be easy. "I am very addicted to Facebook," Feinberg's classmate Elizabeth Dolan told CBS 2. Anthony Orsini, the principal at Benjamin Franklin Middle School in Ridgewood, sent out an e-mail Wednesday morning asking parents to help him get all of his students off social networks and keep careful track of their text messages. "Please do the following: sit down with your child (and they are just children still) and tell them that they are not allowed to be a member of any social networking site. Today! "Let them know that you will at some point every week be checking their text messages online! You have the ability to do this through your cell phone provider. "Let them know that you will be installing Parental Control Software so you can tell every place they have visited online, and everything they have instant messaged or written to a friend. Don't install it behind their back, but install it!" Although Orsini's e-mail is just a request, not an order, it's language is blunt: "It is time for every single member of the BF Community to take a stand! There is absolutely no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! "Let me repeat that - there is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! None." He said the sites have become a tool for children to do psychological harm to each other, often anonymously – a trend known as "cyber-bullying." "Rumors used to be some mean girl says something in the hall, but now it's out there for the whole world to look at," he told CBS 2. Middle schools have always had drama and emotion, but the social networks amplify them to such an extent that guidance counselors there said it's become a menace to their students. Meredith Wearly, the school's guidance counselor, said about 75 percent of her day is spent dealing with social networking issues with students. Since the e-mail has gone out, the principal said the reaction has been generally positive. But the truth will come when individual negotiations take place between parent and child to get them off Facebook. Feinberg said she plans to argue the issue with her parents. "I'm not going to do anything bad, so why should I get rid of it?" she said. There are 700 students at Benjamin Franklin Middle. Parents of more than 20 have already responded to the e-mail, and Orsini said he's heard no adult opposition to the idea. Below is a copy of Orsini's entire e-mail: Dear BF Community, In 2002 when I arrived in Ridgewood Facebook did not exist, Youtube did not exist, and MySpace was barely in existence. Formspring (one of the newest internet scourges, a site meant simply to post cruel things about people anonymously) wasn't even in someone's mind. In 2010 social networking sites have now become commonplace, and technology use by students is beyond prevalent. It is time for every single member of the BF Community to take a stand! There is absolutely no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! Let me repeat that - there is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! None. 5 of the last 8 parents who we have informed that their child was posting inappropriate things on Facebook said their child did not have an account. Every single one of the students had an account. 3 Students yesterday told a guidance counselor that their parents told them to close their accounts when the parents learned they had an account. All three students told their parents it was closed. All three students still had an account after telling their parents it was closed. Most students are part of more than one social networking site. Please do the following: sit down with your child (and they are just children still) and tell them that they are not allowed to be a member of any social networking site. Today! Let them know that you will at some point every week be checking their text messages online! You have the ability to do this through your cell phone provider. Let them know that you will be installing Parental Control Software so you can tell every place they have visited online, and everything they have instant messaged or written to a friend. Don't install it behind their back, but install it! Over 90% of all homework does not require the internet, or even a computer. Do not allow them to have a computer in their room, there is no need. Know that they can text others even if their phone doesn't have texting capability, either through the computer or through their Ipod touch. Have a central "docking station" preferably in your bedroom, where all electronics in the home get charged each night, especially anything with a cell or wifi capability (Remember when you were in high school and you would sneak the phone into your bedroom at midnight to talk to you girlfriend or boyfriend all night - now imagine what they can do with the technology in their rooms). If your son or daughter is attacked through one of these sites or through texting - immediately go to the police! Insist that they investigate every situation. Also, contact the site and report the attack to the site - they have an obligation to suspend accounts or they are liable for what is written. We as a school can offer guidance and try to build up any student who has been injured by the social networking scourge, but please insist the authorities get involved. For online gaming, do not allow them to have the interactive communication devices. If they want to play Call of Duty online with someone from Seattle, fine, they don't need to talk to the person. The threat to your son or daughter from online adult predators is insignificant compared to the damage that children at this age constantly and repeatedly do to one another through social networking sites or through text and picture messaging. It is not hyperbole for me to write that the pain caused by social networking sites is beyond significant - it is psychologically detrimental and we will find out it will have significant long term effects, as well as all the horrible social effects it already creates. I will be more than happy to take the blame off you as a parent if it is too difficult to have the students close their accounts, but it is time they all get closed and the texts always get checked. I want to be clear, this email is not anti-technology, and we will continue to teach responsible technology practices to students. They are simply not psychologically ready for the damage that one mean person online can cause, and I don't want any of our students to go through the unnecessary pain that too many of them have already experienced. Some people advocate that the parents and the school should teach responsible social networking to students because these sites are part of the world in which we live. I disagree, it is not worth the risk to your child to allow them the independence at this age to manage these sites on their own, not because they are not good kids or responsible, but because you cannot control the poor actions of anonymous others. Learn as a family about cybersafety together at wiredsafety.org for your own knowledge. It is a great site. But then do everything I asked in this email - because there really is no reason a child needs to have one of these accounts. Please take action in your on home today. Sincerely, Anthony Orsini Principal, BFMS I found this very interesting and well put. He is not banning social networking but asking parents to reach out to their kids. What do you think of this? If you were a parent with a child in this school, would you talk to you child about canceling accounts?
4 responses
• United States
29 Apr 10
I think Mr. Orsini is well intentioned, but horribly, horribly misguided. There's no reason a child needs to be part of a football team, and there are risks of physical injury associated with football, but I don't see Mr. Orsini writing home and asking parents to ban their kids from football. There are reasons that it's beneficial for a child to play football, or other sports, and a responsible parent weighs those benefits against the risks and decides whether to accept it or not. Similarly, there are benefits for a child to be involved in social networks, and a responsible parent weighs those benefits against the risks and decides whether to accept it or not. Worse, Mr. Orsini suggests that parents present his decision on how their children should use technology in an arbitrary and authoritarian way, laden with threats and no explanation of the underlying thought. That's just bad parenting. With all respect to Mr. Orsini, recommending that parents flatly reject a technology rather than evaluate it and whether there are ways to mitigate the associated risks risks is indeed anti-technology. Particularly when we don't see Mr. Orsini making headlines by sending letters home to parents about the much larger problem of in-the-flesh bullying.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 Apr 10
I think you possibly missed where he asked, not demanded. He offered up himself as a scapegoat for the parents and I think the main point of the letter was to point out the MANY problems this school is having due to social networking sites
• United States
30 Apr 10
If you reread the post to which you reply, you will see that "suggest" is the term I used. The fact that he offers himself up as the bad guy -- he can only be the scapegoat if he's innocent -- doesn't change the poorness of his advice. I remain skeptical that the problems this school is having due to social networking sites is anywhere close to the problems they're having due to real-time bullying. Mr. Orsini offers what we call in the security business FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt), but he simply does not make the cast that parents should do as he asks in this matter.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 Apr 10
ok, thank you very much for your response. As always, you present a well thought out argument.
• United States
29 Apr 10
I have family who work in this school system and what is not being put in this article is the cyber bullying, the 14 arrests of child predators who have been from these sites and the fact that many of the kids are checking these sites in school while in class. I do not allow my kids (one is this age the other just younger) to have accounts as this is not appropriate places for them at this age. I think about the things my friends post and that includes our family who my kids would most likely be friends with and I would never let them see that. It is not wrong for a School official to ask parents to be apart of their children's lives and I bet that if many of them went on and saw what their kids where doing they would be shocked and appalled by what they find.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Apr 10
Thank you for the extra info. I think the article alluded to it but should have expanded. I agree, younguns dont need to be there. My daughter is 16 and has monitored accounts, meaning, I monitor them everyday to see what she is saying and to whom and who is saying what to her.
• United States
30 Apr 10
That is great that you check up. One of the parents who is speaking out against this man the most was very surprised when another mother brought up some rather sexy photos of his well endowed daughter from her Facebook, where the mother also showed him that many of her over 400 "friends" where men over the age of 40, 40!, and from all over the country, people she could never really know. Apparently until this came up this father didn't even know she had any accounts like this. Some people need to wake up and realize this isn't always a good thing.
1 person likes this
• United States
30 Apr 10
by the way the girl was only 13!
1 person likes this
@hvedra (1619)
30 Apr 10
Well I wish him luck with that... A lot of parents don't pay much attention to what their kids are doing in general, social networking sites and the bullying that they are used to perpetuate is just one problem among many. It does seem a bit strange that kids are using these sites so much, using a computer to talk to people you see most days is a bit weird - of course I feel the same way about adults doing the same thing. People seem a bit bewildered and even get upset when I tell them they will not find me on facebook because I don't have an account. They get all twitchy that I'm not "joining in" with what they like and sometimes act as if I've just slammed a door in their face or told them to get lost! I can understand why schools want a ban on social networking sites and even mobile 'phones carried by students. Kids (and quite a few adults) cannot leave them alone even for a few minutes and it is very disruptive. Texting when someone is talking to you is RUDE and I just walk off if someone does that to me - teachers don't have that choice. There's an interesting case just been finished here in the UK involving a school teacher who "lost it" during a lesson where pupils had been disruptive and trying to make him snap. They were videoing and planning to distribute the film afterwards. This is the kind of thing that can and does go on when the use of technology by kids isn't monitored by their parents.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 Apr 10
I think all electronics should be out of the classroom, my daughters school, they are not allowed. They can keep them in their locker for before and after school.
1 person likes this
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
29 Apr 10
I don't have kids (as you probably know), but I wouldn't allow my kids to have an account until they were probably 16 (a junior in high school). I'd be monitoring their text messaging, social networking, internet...and probably would be "hated". I'm not even sure I'd let my kid have a cell phone until he/she was...21.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Apr 10
lol it is hard, but I do monitor. And she has to pay for the stuff.