New poll shows voters favour democrats for November election.

United States
May 16, 2010 2:17pm CST
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/15/new-poll-restless-voters-_n_577462.html Yes, yes, I know its a poll, and any can be doctored to appear how they want, and yes, this is a liberal website, but I mostly posted this so you right wingers can see all the comments listed in this story. The republicans don't have it in the bag either, so don't get overly cocky. As sane people begin to see the effect of Obama's and the dems policies, more and more people will be voting Democrat.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
16 May 10
I've always felt it was a mistake to vote the Party and not the individual so I hope that, when the time comes, the voters look at what each candidate has to offer before making a choice. Not all incumbents are bad, not all Democrats are bad and neither are all Republicans or Independents. If your representative has represented your state well, why throw him/her out? As a matter of fact, this anti-incumbent rhetoric has been responsible for too many inconsistencies and contradictions. The Tea Party in general wants all of the fat cats out on both sides yet Sarah Palin, the mouthpiece of the Tea Party Express who considers themselves to be King, only wants the Democrat incumbents out. The Republicans currently holding office in Washington...most especially John McCain who she campaigned for...are okie dokie. People don't like conflicting messages and double standards so it's good IMO that they're starting to look at the person instead of just the party.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
16 May 10
I didn't mean to make you feel like I was putting you in check, ladybug. I just get irritated by the "throw the bums out...but not my bums" attitude. It's not possible for all politicians to be bad...except for the one this person or that person likes. It's funny that you mentioned big business, by the way. As you know our governor is not running for reelection because he's running for a Senate seat. A candidate to replace him as governor has recently appeared on my television. He seems like a nice guy but he's a business man and so far is only focusing on "Charlie Crist bad...me good". I need waaaaay more information about this guy to even consider voting for him.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
17 May 10
Well, that's good then. You also give me a perspective I don't normally get down here in my little world. No one can learn anything if their mind is closed to all possibilities.
• United States
16 May 10
Spalladino - I like when you put me in check. I do lean a little left, and sometimes forget that republicans in office are actually people, and maybe even qualified. I don't like any of the religious candidates who have to blatantly announce it, and I don't like big business, but, maybe, somewhere, there is a republican candidate who can meet my standards. I have yet to see one, but, thanks to people like you, I will be keeping a keen eye on the candidates voting history and overall performance. I have to be honest - I will most likely never vote for a republican, but I will give more time to researching their performance before automatically discounting them. And only because of people like you.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
16 May 10
Leftybug, I usually respond with respect to your discussions, but I've noticed that you've been on a rampage whenever you post recently. What's the point of attacking folks? "As sane people begin to see the effect of Obama's and the dems policies..." Don't take it for granted. Folks will eventually stop responding. I hope you enjoy my pennies.
• United States
16 May 10
How is this post any different than those saying the republicans will own 2010, and going on to call Obama a usurper or a communist or alleging he pals around with terrorists, etc. I, quite frankly, don't need any responses from my opposition, as they are tired used and canned and ill informed arguments. I am hoping that more lefty bugs flock to mylot, and they will in time, as I have seen them coming aboard and shifting the balance, no longer making this republican-lot. "As sane people begin to see the effect . . ." was a paraphrase as one of the commenters posting in the article. Palin and Bachman are complete lunatics, and those are the two that the GOP has to rely on right now. They are the ones making waves and media storms, but as a laughing stock. Any sane person would realize that the job market, real estate, health care, are all turning around due to Obama's and the dems policies, while the GOP plays obstructionist. Any crazed right wing nut would look at Palin, the tea party, or Bachman as a prophet. I am allowed to be angry - I live in this country, where the right wing continues to spread injustice.
@piasabird (1737)
• United States
17 May 10
I disagree with just about everything you've written, Leftybug. "I, quite frankly, don't need any responses from my opposition, as they are tired used and canned and ill informed arguments." And you sound quite closed minded and intolerate. In other words, a typical liberal. Where are those jobs? I don't see them. When will the foreclosures stop? In one county in Florida there is always about 650 Fannie Mae foreclosures as long as I've been paying attention to it (months). Health care is gonna cost much more than was first projected. Obama is sending us right to the poor house.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 May 10
Piasa - Only maters can call me leftybug. I am assuming you don't listen to the news? Put on NPR once in a while, and you will learn of the increase in jobs, and the housing market rebound. Because Obama is doing a great job conquering the monstrous debt Bush created for him to tackle, he is working on the financial aspect of the healthcare reform, and making sure everything is sustainable. Are you currently making six figures? This is mostly taxing at a very small percentage on those making $200k plus. Obama is looking out for the blue collar workers, the impoverished, and the middle class. And this is sending us to the poor house - how?
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
17 May 10
The link cited the improved economy. From what I have seen only the media is reporting the economy is improving. Unemployment is increasing, Government debt growing at an alarming rate, the stock market is in decline and we are told that things are getting better. We will see in November how accurate the poll is.
• United States
18 May 10
I'd urge you to take a look at the comments more than the polls. My lefty friends are doing a great job defending our wing. I think, though, common amongst both wings, they want the incumbents out.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
19 May 10
Hi there! I don't have a lot of time for mylot these days and I just came on for a minute here to see if what happened yesterday in my state (Pennsylvania) had sunk in and your posting was the first related one I came across. In case you haven't seen the PA results: Arlen Spector was soundly defeated by a Democratic congressman (my district) who is more liberal than the Spector. Also, John Murtha's aide defeated his Republican oponent in the special runoff in western PA. So, in spite of all the right wing warnings, in PA at least, the message is "IT'S OKAY TO BE A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT". You can actually win elections that way in this blue state. Hope the president and the rest of the country heard.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
18 May 10
At best that poll is a fluke. Rasmussen Reports polls consistently each week and are the most accurate poll and least volatile poll as they poll likely voters. They still show republicans with a solid 5 point lead. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot Regardless of what one cherry-picked poll says, voting trends clearly indicate the democrats will lose seats in the coming election. The only question is "How many?"
• United States
17 May 10
I take most polls with a grain of salt (as you said). But what I would like to see is people voting on the individual and not the party. Each party has good and bad in them so voting "straight tickets" is NOT a good idea. Or voting for someone just because the "president" or another politican you like is in that party...is not a good idea. Vote on the merits of each person who is running. That is my motto. This party line bs lets a lot of bad people get elected in my opinion.
• United States
18 May 10
I just don't think I could ever vote republican. The closest I have come to respecting one in office is Eric Cantor. I don't believe in his beliefs, but, I think he is one very strategic and intelligent guy, and could command a room.