Kemp or Pollard

at least for t20 pollard is certainly the best for me....i mean he is just too fast for the game...unmatched....really hard hitter.....fantastic run rate - useful bowler what else you want from a player in shorter version of the game....hats off to pollard --

i agree both are hard hitters but Polard is ffar better bowller then Kemp. Kemp is playing in the team as part timer but i can think WI can play Pollard as regular bowler like MI did in IPL 2010.also The hard hiiting by polard is far-2 better then any batsmen in the cricket world. So, in my opinion Kemp is far better player then Kemp (no comparison).

Both are good but I feel Kemp is past his best and Pollard is just a young man about to start along international career with a lot of cricket left in him.I think he is definitely the better of the two at the moment.

I also like the other mylotters feel that pollard is better of them.He is good thinking cricketer and can hit the balls to miles.He is good thinking bowler for me also good fielder in the deep.

Both Kemp and Pollard are similar kind of players. But Kemp is playing international cricket for quite a while now and still he hasn't performed up to his potential. While Pollard has already made his mark in international cricket. As both cn bat and bowl, nothing to discuss about that so Pollard is my choice.

both are very good hard hitter bowler but according to me pollard is the best c'coz he is youngb and kemp is old so pollard is the besat

both are aggressive batsmen but kemp is a better bowler. pollard can hit the ball farther than any batsmen these days so he scores in that department over kemp. i would say pollard is the better option between the two.