i don't care what you stand for. just cross your legs.

opened legs for elena kagan - no crossing of the legs for this woman. if the hoisery would've been made of thicker material like that of ballerinas' tights it would've looked this bad. how come she didn't opt for pants if crossing her legs would be uncomfortable for her? i wonder what those who can see this are feeling. ashamed or disgusted. plainly ruins the image of women in power.
@Ritchelle (3790)
Philippines
May 26, 2010 2:30am CST
all little girls were taught this by their moms. common sense when growing up would lead us to pants whenever we're not sure if we could cross our legs for a long time. what's wrong with public women wearing pants? i know that it is an unspoken protocol that women in power are preferred in skirts but sometimes pants would be the only option. see elena kagan's pose, a supreme court nominee in the u.s.
2 people like this
7 responses
• United States
26 May 10
Really? The most important think that strikes you about a Supreme Court nominee is how she positions her legs when she sits? Really? It even makes the top ten? Really? What's your opinion of how "Justice" Scalia positions his legs when he sits?
1 person likes this
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
27 May 10
am in mylot and not a survey conducted by any reputable agency in your country. am here to entertain myself and probably earn a little. it's your freedom to respond or snob any discussion or even try to pick a fight. but you picked the wrong girl to do that with. you just made me earn .
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
27 May 10
and here is a little more comment to make you earn also. don't bother replying / making me earn in any way.
• United States
27 May 10
Post in public, expect a public response. Whether or not you earn impacts my life not at all. Don't spend it all in once place.
@jb78000 (15139)
26 May 10
erm, is she being nominated for the supreme court or to run a finishing school for girls in the 1890s?
1 person likes this
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
27 May 10
any comment can be interpreted in a lot of ways but i'd take yours my way. it's funny . thanks for replying.
@jb78000 (15139)
27 May 10
thanks
@laglen (19759)
• United States
26 May 10
The proper way for a lady to sit is ankles crossed and pushed back. back straight, hands in lap.
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
27 May 10
true .
@AmbiePam (121190)
• United States
27 May 10
She sits like a man. She also sits like a person who is more comfortable in jeans or pants than a skirt or dress.
1 person likes this
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
28 May 10
true. she should have had chosen to wear pants. she could still look feminine in one.
• United States
26 May 10
Crossing your legs in a skirt is a NO NO. Sit straight... tuck your feet back,knees together and slightly turned to one side (both to the same side) and cross your ankles.
1 person likes this
@Ritchelle (3790)
• Philippines
27 May 10
i hear you, friend. but people still call it crossing one's legs . however, the position you mentioned is quite tiring for a time, right?
@gloryacam (5540)
• Philippines
26 May 10
actually, for those really conscious of etiquette, crossing the legs, especially for women is a no-no. the thing to do is to tuck them together or to tuck one leg behind the other. since the advent of equal opportunities between men and women, moms are having less and less time to teach their kids things like these. this, and the fact that people are more into "mind your own business", and "express your self", etiquette is something that's less and less seen. i don't see any problem with women wearing pants, even those in power. i see a lot of them in pants. i think it's part of what we earned when we fought for equal rights.
1 person likes this
@lelin1123 (15594)
• Puerto Rico
26 May 10
To me the correct way for a women to sit is both legs closed and both feet to the side or one foot behind the other. Crossing legs is also not good for circulation at least that is what I was always told. However, nothing is showing so its not like her legs are wide open. I don't understand the problem here. If her legs were wide open and you could see her undies then I would understand.