Luis Fabiano's handball
By wakawaka
@wakawaka (134)
Indonesia
June 20, 2010 6:19pm CST
Lots of people say the 2nd goal of Brasil should be disallowed because Luis Fabiano was handball. For me, i think it wasn't a handball, because Fabiano unintentionally touched the ball. And i think Harry Kewel's handball yesterday also not a handball. Ghana shouldn't get that penalty, and Australia should win the game. I'm not the fan of Australia, but fairly, i think they should win.
1 person likes this
1 response
@ram_cv (16513)
• India
21 Jun 10
There was not one, but hand balls in the build up to that goal. Fabiano has admitted to hand balling, but insists it was not intentional. I do not buy that argument. The first one was more blatant than the second one and happened just outside the box. I think that goal should not have stood.
Cheers!
Ram
@wakawaka (134)
• Indonesia
22 Jun 10
No, i think the goal is valid, because it was unintentional. If you compare it with handball of serbian player when they're defeated 1-0 against Ghana. Fabiano's intention was to hold the ball with his chest, but unintentionally touched the ball with his hand (i think).
