Michael Steele opens up his mouth again, and guess what happens?

United States
July 2, 2010 7:44pm CST
To bad school is out for most children in America, but I am sure that is it a good thing for RNC head Michael Steele. It would be interesting to see how many school children know what president started the war in Afghanistan. Mr. Steele who said yesterday said of the war in Afghanistan "a war of Obama's choosing," angered not only Democrats, but Republicans as well who have supported the war. Mr. Steele didn't stop there, he also said "This is not something the United States had actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in." Did I miss hell freezing over, and the flying pigs? Has the leader of the RNC finally found something that could unite the Democrats, and the Republicans?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Jul 10
You know he specifically is a large part of why I stopped calling myself a republican. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the past RNC heads have been just as ignorant, I just never paid attention to them before. It's too bad. I really thought he was a pretty smart guy before he got this job. I'd seen him on talk shows before and had a fair bit of respect for him. This is actually worse than when Giuliani said there were no terrorist attacks against us when Bush was president.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
3 Jul 10
Taskr, would you believe I thought he was a pretty smart guy before he got that job? I mean, I didn't agree with him on everything but I thought he seemed decent and intelligent. What the heck happened...lol? Annie
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Jul 10
Yeah any politician that tries to make everyone happy, even in his own party, will be an abysmal failure. It can't happen. The Tea Party wasn't created under his watch though. That started in the last year of the Bush administration. It's just become particularly powerful since then and that has been more a result of Obama paired with Bush than anything Steele has done or could do. You're right that smart people say stupid things. Nobody is immune to putting their foot in their mouth. With Steele though, it's just one thing after another and it's not always what he says, but what he does like the phony census forms he sent out.
2 people like this
• United States
3 Jul 10
I personally think he is over his head in this position, and is just trying to make everyone happy, which is IMPOSSIBLE. He also has to deal with the creation of the Tea Party under his watch, and I am sure there are many people that blame him for this. I agree he seamed smart, but even smart people say stupid things from time to time.
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Jul 10
While I am NOT a republican...I would like to comment on the this. Personally I think most of this country on both sides are sick of both wars and have been for a while. Not just now or in the last year that Obama was elected but even while Bush was still in office. Bush started both wars...but Obama has chosen to continue them. It is being said that the war in Afghanistan may go on for another 5 or 6 years. That ticks me off. I want them both over now. They cost too much (money and lives) and I don't see how we can win either one. So why are we there? What purpose does it sure us? What good will come out of it? More money spent, more lives lost. I actually know a lot of republicans that don't agree with either war.
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Jul 10
Lil, I did not approve of the war in Iraq, and if we would have just focused on the task at hand, the war in Afghanistan would be over by now. I don't recall any republicans upset with either war until Obama came into office, as a matter of fact I can't tell you how many times I was called UNAMERICAN for protesting the war in Iraq. Iraq seams to be coming under some what of control (about as good as you are going to get), but Afghanistan is a different story. Obama did set a time table, but the military doesn't like that idea, but war is their job, and when there isn't any wars going on they lose money. I do believe that the war in Afghanistan does need to be fought, and needs to be won to stop the terrorist from creating another safe haven. But, the leadership and the people in Afghanistan needs to start pulling their weight. We can't be there forever!!!!
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Jul 10
the last couple of years of Bush I know I was hard pressed to find anyone who really supported the war in Iraq but the blind bush followers. You are absolutely right that the war in Iraq really hurt us in Afghanistan. It would be a lot further along if had left Iraq alone. My only issue with Afghinstan is we have been there how long and we have not made a lot of progress. I agree we need to stop the terrorist. But as long as they can run across the Pakinstan border and back....that is going to be hard. We can run them out of afghanistan...but after we leave they will just come back. So what did the war accomplish? We are NOT winning the hearts and minds of the people in either country. They don't want us there. I have been fustrated with both Afghinstan and Iraq's response...they really need to step up the plate and take over their own countries. But either they can't or don't want to...and I don't see how we can make them. I know we have a withdraw date for Iraq...but I don't see an end date in sight for Afghanistan.
• United States
5 Jul 10
I agree that we need to stop the flow of terrorist into Pakistan, and into Afghanistan. But, we need a strong government in both countries, and we don't have that in either right now. You are correct that we need better leadership in Afghanistan, and Iraq to help the entire world. But, we also want democracy in both countries, and you don't get democracy when you select a leader (see Iraq before Saddam). I hope that you are not right about Afghanistan, but I fear that you are.
@o0jopak0o (6390)
• Philippines
3 Jul 10
well i think he is just taken out of context? or is he really out of this world.
• United States
5 Jul 10
He wasn't taken out of context, he actually said this. Yes, he is something else.
@dboman (457)
• United States
4 Jul 10
Could this be the final straw? I hope so. Steele has shown ineptitude for a long time, and maybe the GOP can put someone in there who has a clue. As far as "something that could unite the Democrats"...nah. This is really just another dumb comment from a politician...unless your mainstream media and Democratic friends drag it out, which I think would be a bad idea for the Democratic Party. Why? Well, Americans are worried about the economy and the oil spill. IMO, dramatizing something Steele said at a fundraiser would show the desire to attack meaningless comments along party lines and an inability to engage on actual issues.
• United States
5 Jul 10
Either way this isn't good for the republican party, but maybe very great for the Tea Party. This is the major problem I see with the Tea Party is their lack of leadership and coordination. Many of the people that consider themselves members, and many that could become members don't know where to turn to for information, and leadership. If the tea party members could all come together, they could take a large chunk of the RNC with them, thus creating a NEW PARTY that can distance themselves from the old party which really doesn't represent them anyways. They also could mold a new platform that just might be able to change this country the way they want to. They need a leader with balls that will take over this rage tag group get them motivated, and organized. The natural leader would be Ron Paul, but he is going to have to end his pact with the devil (the RNC) and move to where he belongs. This is easy for me to say when I don't have a six figure salary, and a cushy job like Paul does. But, leadership is not something that you decide to do, it is something that comes natural.