Immigration Madness

United States
July 9, 2010 1:54pm CST
Anually, the US, by law, awards about 55,000 immigrant visas under the diversity visa program to people in countries/nations with allegedly low rate of immigrants to the US. After 30 days in the US, winners of these diversity visas to the US are eligible for almost any benefit a US national and/or US citizen is entitled to. The requirements are that the diversity visa entrant have at least a high school education or its equivalent or have, within the past five years, two years of work experience in an occupation requiring at least two years' training or experience. However, it is no secret that several people apply for and get this visas, regardless. Meanwhile, we have people in the US (some of them legally to the US but have for some reason overstayed their visas, and some who came to the US illegally). New immigration laws are making life very difficult for several of these people already in the US after years of investing in the US: Some came to the US at a time when US laws did not forbid them from obtaining legal documents; but with the current immigration laws, these people (already holders of legal US documents) are not able to renew and/or obtain replacements for legally obtained US documents. Instead of giving 55,000 immigrant visas to people outside the US to come to the US and within days be entitled to benefits that they never invested, while not grant these 55,000 annual immigrant visas to those already in the US who have invested in the nation in one form or another and are now in a catch-22 situation?
1 person likes this
1 response
@laglen (19759)
• United States
10 Jul 10
Nets - no matter which side of immigration you are on, I think we can all agree it needs to be overhauled, the question is, in which direction. I have a sister in law that had lived in the US for 13 years, then they moved to the Phillipines, for my brother's job. They came back and she applied for citizenship. After jumping through all of the hoops, and paying all of the money, they said she was ineligible because they left for a couple of years. She now must live here for 10 years and re apply. My brother said she should just let her visa expire, then she can get amnesty. I do not blame him for this view. The biggest problem is that SO MANY people are trying to get in. Trying to process so many people takes time and money. I believe getting 90% of the bureaucracy out would help tremendously. But first I think they MUST secure the borders, it may sound heartless, but our Nations security should come first.
• United States
12 Jul 10
What amnesty for expired visa for the documented? I know of no such thing. Anyway, I think that it all boils down to the fact that we are a nation that prefers to encourage illegal activities: People who come to the US legally always have a very difficult time due to immigration restrictions placed on them, while those who enter illegally often get amnesty and a passport to an easy life (at the expense of hard working and struggling Americans) is often given to some for propaganda purposes. Such a sorry story!
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
13 Jul 10
the amnesty that seems to be coming.
• United States
13 Jul 10
About "so many people are trying to get in": Why not put up a fence or shut the borders, manage those that are already in the nation under their PROPER BRITH NAMES and then open the door for new comers?