Muralitharan is better than S.Warne says Ganguly,.....Do you agree?

I am not a big fan of comparing great bowlers. I think Warne and Murali were great bowlers - one was the best leg spinner and one the best off spinner of our times. Naturally as a left hander Ganguly finds it more difficult to face Murali as the ball from Murali goes away. While with Warne the ball comes into Ganguly. The one good thing going for India is the fact that both these greats have their worst records against India showing that Indian batsmen have been the best players of spin over the past two decades or so. Cheers! Ram

Hello, I don't agree this.Sourav has told the reporters about his opinion.Muralitharan is a good bowler who bowls in correct areas to keep taking wickets.Shane Warne is also a good bowler.He enjoys his game and makes the opponent team nervous.Both of these spinners have the same quality ,only their style is a difference.I think if Shane Warne continued playing he would have taken even 900 wickets .

I would say murali is better than warne. warne can only able to bowl the leg spin.murali can bowl offspin and legspin. the legspin he bowl is called doosra. here in the legspin the ball will not turn more but it makes confusion to the batsman,how the ball will turn.By finding this method of doosra, murali took lot of wickets, broken all the records of test match.So murali is better than warne.Many people says murali's action is not correct because they don't know how to play against the murali's magical bowling.