Gingrich Compares Mosque Backers to Nazis

@anniepa (27955)
United States
August 17, 2010 2:26pm CST
Possible GOP Presidential wanna-be Newt Gingrich is at it again. While discussing the proposed community center and mosque several blocks from Ground Zero in NYC on "Fox and Friends" Monday he had this to say: “Nazis don't have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust museum in Washington. Gingrich then went on to claim that “we would never accept the Japanese putting up a site next to Pearl Harbor. There is no reason for us to accept a mosque next to the World Trade Center.” : http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41112.html He accused the Muslim-Americans behind the proposed center of being "radical islamists who want to prove that they can build a mosque next to a place where 3,000 Americans were killed by Islamists.” Any comments? Does anyone else think it's time to stop evoking Hitler and the Nazis whenever there's a difference of opinion? Annie
5 people like this
12 responses
• United States
17 Aug 10
The really amusing thing is that the people building Cordoba House are Sufis. If Cordoba House had existed on 9/11, bin Ladin would have had his stooges attack it instead of the WTC. If Newt Gingrich was serious about opposing terror, he'd be front and center allying himself with the folks building Cordoba house rather than trying to capitalize on anti-Islamic sentiment. (Yes, I know someone will now repeat the insistence that it isn't about religion. You're lying, and we know you're lying, so don't bother.) Of course, when contemplating amusing stories about Newt Gingrich, we mustn't forget about how he left one of his ex-wives and their children in such desperate straits that a Church had to hold a charity drive to pay for their shelter and clothing. Indeed, we should remember that every time that man shows his face in public. He's a disgrace, and every time he opens his mouth he only disgraces himself and everyone who ever voted for him further.
3 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Aug 10
Thank you for bringing up Newt's horrendous track record as a husband. What I find really ironic is how he's been a hypocrite every step of the way going back to when he engineered the GOP takeover of Congress back in 1994 and during his tenure of Speaker of the House until he was forced to resign in disgrace. He was attacking former President Clinton on a daily basis while he was cheating on his second wife with his current, much younger wife number three who was on his staff at the time. If John Edwards were currently going on TV and talking about his campaign message, which I think was excellent whether he turned out to be a cheating scumbag or not, the same people who respect Gingrich despite his disgusting behavior through the years would be having a fit. Annie
• United States
17 Aug 10
He doesn't get it. He truly thinks that All Muslims are terrorists . Wrong. The A$4holes who were behind 911 weren't true Muslims. But A bigot like Newt will never see that way. Thankfully there are more people like me, a non Muslim with good , kind, American Muslim Friends. In fact Newt's tirade is Exactly what the terrorists Want. They think if we Americans see All Muslims as terrorists either we will kill the Muslim Americans who the terrorists see as infidels Or The Muslims here will get so angry and come join them. sorry Fellas, it aint happening! The one thing American stands for is religious freedom and even thought most on the right see it as th right to choose Which Christian Church to go to, Many See it as the right to practice Any religion. They can get upset and protest but there will be Muslim Americans. They are not going anywhere. They will need mosques to go to and they Will be built.
2 people like this
• United States
18 Aug 10
I really think this video kind of shows how people feel: http://www.exposeobama.co.
• United States
18 Aug 10
@sarahruthbeth: No, he doesn't really think that. He's made a career of saying things he knows perfectly well are false because they play to people's fears and bigotries in order to get their votes. His tirade is what the terrorists want because he and the terrorists both want the same thing: an enemy they can point at to scare people into staying in power.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Aug 10
I think the comparisons he chose as examples are excellent. Whether he had the right to say that....well that is just invoking his right to free speech. Even you as an Obama minion cannot deny him that?? BTW don't you think it is time to stop evoking Bush every time Obama has a problem???
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
25 Aug 10
Gee, whiteheather, if you don't see an opportunity to insult me for not hating our President you invent one anyway, even if the discussion has nothing to do with him! Oh, well, I certainly respect your right to free speech. Speaking of Newt Gingrich, I don't recall seeing anyone trying to take away HIS free speech rights. One question though - just because we have the right to free speech does that mean we SHOULD say whatever stupid and ignorant thing that pops into our heads? That's Newt for you! Just think, according to him what he SAYS is very important, not what he does in his despicable, disgusting adulterous and hypocritical life. But I suppose he's a good man who deserves your respect while our President is dirt under your feet, right? Sorry but I just don't get it! Annie
• United States
18 Aug 10
Quite the contrary! We recognize and honor his right to free speech when we respond by noting that he's using his free speech to say stupid things.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Aug 10
Floyd Brown has made a long career of using his free speech to say stupid things.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
18 Aug 10
Don't you know Annie, anyone who disagrees with ANYONE is a Nazi now. That's what the Nazis did, they disagreed with people. So if you disagree with the mosque, you're a Nazi. If you disagree with those who are against the mosque, you are a Nazi. If you disagree with Obama, you are a Nazi, if you disagree with those who are against Obama, you're a Nazi. See, Naziism is all about disagreements. Well that, and clearly everyone who disagrees with something is guilty of killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Jewish people.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Aug 10
Excellent post, Taskr! That's really what we've gotten to, isn't it? I think it's time to stop it. It's wrong no matter who says it or about whom they say it, unless they're talking about someone who truly is an evil murderer, and not just by some loose association. Before you get the chance to remind me, I know there were some on the left who have called former President Bush "Hitler" and other nasty and undeserved names and they were just as wrong as anyone whose done it from the right. Annie
• United States
17 Aug 10
Hi, Annie! Only if there is another major horror, similar to Hitler's, will people stop bringing him into every controversial conversation. The mosque was to be built a few blocks from the 9/11 site, not right there. It's leader has said he'll listen to any other suggestions, and he agrees that getting too close to the site is definitely problematic. Let's not forget, most of us are aware of and respect freedom of religion...
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Aug 10
I'm so sorry, I could have sworn I'd already replied to your post! Anyway, I totally agree. Until, and let's hope and pray it never happens, there IS someone comparable to Hitler and the Nazis trying to build something or in office or running for office here in the USA, let's refrain from using that comparison. It's a slap in the face to anyone who suffered at the hands of Hitler during the Holocaust or their survivors. This whole concocted controversy is full of lies. it is NOT the "Ground Zero Mosque", it's not "on" Ground Zero and it's not just a mosque, that's a small part of what will be housed in that building. The Muslim gentleman behind it is not a radical jihadist, he's a moderate and has worked for the U.S. government in the past, including under the Bush Administration. He's traveled to the Mid-East with Condoleezza Rice and Karen Hughes! The building that will be used is nothing "sacred", it's a condemned and abandoned Burlington Coat Factory! Annie
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Aug 10
Annie, It's great to have a few minutes, at least, to be able to feel that I'm not along in this thinking. Apparently, there are a lot of people whose minds have been so narrowed that they don't really know what they're saying! Their minds are made up, and they refuse to be sidetracked with a silly thing like the truth!
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Aug 10
I am sick of people calling people nazi's. It seems to be in the "in" thing lately. Don't agree with someone...call them a nazi..it is stupid. One problem with this comparison...the nazi's were a government in Germany. Muslims are a religion that covers the people all over the world. The government in Germany was responsible for killing millions of people. Only the terrorists were responsible for 9/11. So you can't blame or punish a whole religion for what a few people who happen to belong to that religion did. Which is what Gingrich is doing. He is saying ALL muslims are responsible for what happened on 9/11 and they should all be held accountable and punished. Very narrow minded and hateful. I would say Newt has some fearmonger issues. Same with Japan...that was a government attacking us. The Muslims religion did not attack us...Al Quida did. Terrorists attacked us. NOT A RELIGION. 3,000 Americans were not killed by Islamists...they were killed by terrorists. There is a difference. If Newt can't tell the difference between the two...then he definately doesn't even need to think about running for President. Especially if he is perfectly willing to violate their constitutional rights and discriminate against a whole group of people based on fear and hate. We don't need people in office like that. We did during WW2 and look what happened to the Japanese Americans.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Aug 10
Well said, lil. It's sad that thanks to Newt and other fear-mongering hypocrites like him, some people really don't see the difference between Muslims in general, particularly Muslim-AMERICANS, and terrorists. Annie
@DawGwath (1042)
• Romania
17 Aug 10
Godwin's law anyone? But I think the comparison is more or less accurate. At least from a moral point of view.
• United States
17 Aug 10
I agree that the comparisons are excellent from a moral point of view.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Aug 10
You're using the words "moral point of view" while discussing something Newt Gingrich said? He's arguably the LEAST moral person in the country in my opinion. Of course, he agrees with YOU, it doesn't matter what he does or how he lives his life, it's what he says that matters. Anyway, should I take it that you two honestly believe ALL Muslims, including Muslim-Americans should be lumped in with al Qaeda? Annie
1 person likes this
@DawGwath (1042)
• Romania
18 Aug 10
But that doesn't make it any less legal.
@elmiko (6630)
• United States
18 Aug 10
well Gingrich isn't going to get that far in an election with such comments.
1 person likes this
@jerzgirl (9384)
• United States
17 Aug 10
Gingrich is a adulterous idiot who isn't worth listening to. The Nazi message is hate throughout. The Muslim message is not - it's the extremists who read hate into it.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Aug 10
There's not a thing I can add, jerzgirl, you just said it all! Annie
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
17 Aug 10
It's never time to put the Hitler/Nazi kid to bed. Never. Oh, you wanna raise taxes? HITLER! Oh, you wanna regulate fast food? Nazis! It's perfect. And it's utterly meaningless - just like folks screaming "racism" every single time a minority is slighted. And most of the time it doesn't even have to be that bad to pull it out. So why not? Hitler and the scum-of-the-Earth Nazis aren't anything more in this type of context than the pop culture equivalent of adult cooties. Like Jesse Jackson calling Dan Gilbert a slave owner because Gilbert let out a sissy boy diatribe when LeBron left - a little out of the clock (like some myLot) but just meaningless drivel.
@jb78000 (15139)
17 Aug 10
i think the constant hitler/nazi comparisons are crass and ignorant. i am actually quite surprised to see a leading politician doing this, you'd think he'd know better.
1 person likes this
• Canada
17 Aug 10
How does anyone care what Newt Gingrich says anymore, it's absurd. Then again, Americans still care about Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh... so depressing. In any case, Gingrich is a giant turd and everything that comes out of his mouth is an example of what he is. Of course people need to stop evoking Hitler/Nazis, especially considering the people who do so really don't understand what they're saying.
• United States
17 Aug 10
Personally I do not care what a you, as a foreigner, says anymore, it's absurd to think your bad mouthing our politician holds any weight. Is every politician in Canada so wonderful that you have to trash Americans. Actually I wonder if you understand what you're saying or are you just parroting what annie and her posse are saying???
• Canada
18 Aug 10
You sure do ask a lot of questions of me considering you don't care what I say :) In any case, I have far stronger convictions about the politics in Canada obviously, but that doesn't mean I'm not educated on American politics as well. As for being part of a posse, I'm not clear what Annie you are talking about and I do not talk with anyone on mylot, including my 'friends.' So no, I'm not parroting anyone. The only posse I enjoy is the Party Posse. Yvan eht nioj!
1 person likes this