Tax Cuts who are they for?

@bobmnu (8157)
United States
September 9, 2010 12:54pm CST
President Obama wants to extend the tax cuts for those making $250,000 or less a year. He will not keep the tax cuts for the wealthy. There are problems with this. 1. President Obama stated repeatedly during the election that the Bush Tax Cuts were only for the rich. What is the point of keeping the tax cut for the middle class if they were only for the rich? 2. The tax cuts were not aimed at the rich or poor but aimed at the people who were working and earning an income. There is a difference between wealth and income. The US tax code taxes income not wealth. 3. The more taxes collected the less money people have to spend on goods and services. 4. The high income earners will get more dollars in tax savings because they pay more in taxes. The percent of tax savings is greater at the lower income wage earners. Under the Bush Tax Cuts those having taxable of income of $20,000 or less received a 50% tax reduction (15% vs 10%) while the high wage earners with taxable income above $171,000 received a tax reduction between 11% and 15% 31% to 28% tax rate to a high of 39.6% to 35%) http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm So it seems that the working poor got the biggest tax reduction and not the working rich. The wealthy - non working but with a family inheritance will be paying inheritance tax after January 1, 2011. If you have $1,000,000 in assets you will also be taxes on those assets upon your death after 1-1-2011. Assets include your house, second home, retirement account, and personal property (cars, boats etc) which in today's markets will include many people nearing retirement age as you pay own you home and have a high value in your retirement account. Small business will be extremely hurt because you have to raise the cash and pay the tax even though you wealth is in non cash items. People often sell at a loss just to pay the government and then have less wealth afterwards to live on.
1 response
@Adoniah (7512)
• United States
9 Sep 10
In other words...Small businesses and retired folks get screwed again...Which is as stupid as it gets... Shalom~Adoniah
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Sep 10
Let me say this about business taxes because they are different from personal income taxes. Businesses have the luxury of deducting the cost of doing business which individuals do not. I do taxes for several small businesses, including my own, every year and many times the taxable profit is in the negative or close to it once all of the deductions are taken. These include the cost of goods sold (supplies, inventory), payroll, rent/mortgage payments, utilities (electric, water, telephone, company cell phones), vehicle expenses for company vehicles (loan payments, insurance, gas, services), gas for non-company owned vehicles, office supplies, equipment purchases or rental, contracted services, license fees, etc. It's not as simple as Company A made $400k last year so they are taxed on $400k. This is approximately what one S Corporation I do taxes for makes every year and their tax obligation is 0...nothing...after all of the deductions are taken.
@Adoniah (7512)
• United States
9 Sep 10
I'm not that dumb. I had a small business for years. I paid out so much in worker's comp. that it almost put me under. I do know that some businesses can get away with all kinds of deductions and play I'm in the red for years and get away with it. I did not do that. My business was on wheels per say. It was my trucks going to the work sites. I did not have time to set up a real office, so I did not have that overhead to deduct...lol.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
10 Sep 10
Where did I say you were dumb Adoniah? None of my clients, nor myself, "play" at anything and every deduction taken is legal, legitimate and allowed. It's a little late now but you could have set up office space in your home and gotten some deductions for that. You had to do the paperwork somewhere.