Those who don't drink tend to die sooner than those who do?
By Betty Deng
@bettydeng5 (1822)
China
    September 16, 2010 12:26am CST
                         
            One of the most contentious issues in the vast literature about alcohol consumption 
has been the consistent finding that those who don't drink tend to die sooner 
than those who do. The standard Alcoholics Anonymous explanation for 
this finding is that many of those who show up as abstainers in such research 
are actually former hard-core drunks who had already incurred health problems 
associated with drinking.
But a new paper in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
suggests that — for reasons that aren't entirely clear — abstaining from 
alcohol does tend to increase one's risk of dying, even when you exclude 
former problem drinkers. The most shocking part? Abstainers' mortality rates 
are higher than those of heavy drinkers. 
Moderate drinking, which is defined as one to three drinks per day, 
is associated with the lowest mortality rates in alcohol studies. 
Moderate alcohol use (especially when the beverage of choice is red wine)
 is thought to improve heart health, circulation and sociability, 
which can be important because people who are isolated don't have as many 
family members and friends who can notice and help treat health problems.
But why would abstaining from alcohol lead to a shorter life? 
It's true that those who abstain from alcohol tend to be from 
lower socioeconomic classes, since drinking can be expensive. 
And people of lower socioeconomic status have more life stressors
 — job and child-care worries that might not only keep them from the 
bottle but also cause stress-related illnesses over long periods. 
(They also don't get the stress-reducing benefits of a drink or two after work.)
But even after controlling for nearly all imaginable variables —
 socioeconomic status, level of physical activity, number of close friends, 
quality of social support and so on — the researchers 
(a six-member team led by psychologist Charles Holahan of the University 
of Texas at Austin) found that over a 20-year period, mortality rates
 were highest for those who were not current drinkers, regardless of 
whether they used to be alcoholics, second highest for heavy drinkers
 and lowest for moderate drinkers. (Watch TIME's Video "Taste Test: 
Beer with Extra Buzz.")
That said, the new study provides the strongest evidence yet that
moderate drinking is not only fun but good for you. So make mine a double.
1 response
         @yurijhel (57)
 • Hong Kong
                    20 Sep 10
                    Well the centenarian people doesnt necessary drink but their environment and their way of life probably the main factors. Less stress or no stress at all is the key to a longer life.
                    
 
                             
                        
 
                    