Being Robinhood Style Right Or Wrong?
By visavis
@visavis (5934)
Philippines
October 3, 2010 5:46am CST
Everybody know the style of Robinhood... From the fast up to the present still this trending are available and famous. They are using on their own ways. Since people are having own ways to help others, they considered this kind of way is acceptable to us and to the society. How you can determine the two sides of being Robinhood? Share to us your view and arguements...
2 responses
@magtibaygom (4856)
• Philippines
4 Oct 10
I don't vote for Robinhood because I am "anti-Robinhood". It is not applicable nowadays. Maybe during the olden times, it is. But not today. During those times, when real Robinhood still lives, the setup of the society is so unfair, that if you are born in a peasant family, there is little opportunity available for you. You will remain a peasant for life. If you are born a slave, you will stay slave for life. And those who are born nobles, even if they have minds of idiots, they will live lavish lifestyle... it's so unfair that trigger some Robinhoods in some Robineighborhoods to take up arms and rob the rich so they can distribute the wealth and resources to the poor.
It's no longer the situation today. We are now living in a democratic society where capitalism is the key to progress of an individual. The only Robinhood we see that exist today is the government. Poor people, in their misery and laziness, count on the government to take from the rich and give to the poor. This only breeds more laziness!
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
4 Oct 10
Yes I agree with you of explaining the methods and ways of being Robinhood before.
Through you explanition today Robinhood is from government but allow me to call it curruption which is not for the poor but for their own. In other hand the bictims are the poor which become poorer. Yes also the only few rich man can do something good for the poor.
@getbiswa2000 (5544)
• India
3 Oct 10
Hi,
There will be people like Robinhood as long as there will be incidents of exploitation, oppression and corruption. Robinhood was a patriot. It's his lifestyle that made him more of a pirate than an ordinary man. The guerrilla warfare, living with people in Sherwood away from city, are all signs of his revolt against the traitor King. Now with everything, the style of making revolution has also changed considerably. We have our Robinhood and they are still fighting on many social issues. In fact, there are so many that we can't even recognize all of them. These Robinhoods have improved style which is more effective. Any strong and just man necessarily have two sides - one strong and another flexible - which will be reserved for separate kind of people. Thanks.
God bless you.
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
3 Oct 10
Thanks for your wonderful idea about the topic. Your point is part of the society that accepted such methods. if your idea is like a revolution might be we can considered Che Guevarra as a robinhood and others. I'm talking here is in modern society that they doing out-law then they trying to call it Robinhood. They want is Evil deeds + Helping to Otherd = Good Deeds.. What do you think?



