NPR analyist and contributor Juan Williams Terminated for muslim comments.

@TTCCWW (579)
United States
October 21, 2010 12:29pm CST
Juan Williams contract with National Public Radio was terminated after making a statement on the O'Reilly Factor that he gets nervous when he see's people in Muslim garb getting on airplanes. I have read some of Mr Williams books, followed him on NPR and other outlets for years. I am sorry to see him go. I am also proud of NPR and the standards they set for the media although few other media outlets begin to live up to those standards. NPR recently was also in the news for reminding their staff that they could not attend any of the rally's in Washington as individuals as it would violate their contracts with NPR. The question is, should we, or can we start holding the rest of the media to these kinds of standards or would the talking head stations all go broke? Would Americans watch the news reports made famous by the Walter Cronkite's and Edward R Murrow's of the last generation, where a balanced story was "all important"? Link http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/21/juan-williams-fired-npr_n_770901.html
1 person likes this
5 responses
@dukeace (32)
• United States
21 Oct 10
To be honest, just because of some dumb guys spread terrorism and belonged to the religion of Islam doesn't make all the Muslim world a terrorist culture. Those were Muslim individuals and according to Islamic Law, anyone who kills the innocent will perish in HELL for the rest of his eternity. Individuals of a certain religion these days CAN NOT REPRESENT NOR CREATE an identity for that specific religion. It is a human mind that is corrupted and starts thinking negatively. I myself am a Muslim and I feel sad for what happened at 9-11. It just makes me SICK! I wish I could get my hands on the throats of those who crashed those planes onto the Twin Towers.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
22 Oct 10
You are right. As a Christian, I've suffered this type of stereotyping, too. Many people seem to think because I am Christian I am represented by those fanatics that bomb abortion clinics (which are horrifying but most of us would never dream of murder as a solution to that problem) or those that proselytize on street corners threatening people with hellfire. Christians are under attack in my country. Mr. Williams went on to say that just because he and others were nervous in that situation, it was wrong to judge all Muslims by those fears. I respect the man a lot, he has more integrity in his little finger than all those NPR "analysts" have in their collective numbers. I don't always agree with him but he never says things solely for his own gain or to conform with his party dictates. I believe that most Muslims feel as you do. I used to wish they were more vocal but I'm convinced that they just don't get the publicity that our media give to the bigots who blame a whole religion for the actions of a few.
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Oct 10
dukeace The crazy's that kill for their religion are always the ones who have failed to read their own book. It is intresting that in America when a horrible crime is commited in the name of Christianity it gets very little read by the media and people forget that all religions have their crazies out there.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
21 Oct 10
I find absolutely nothing wrong with Juan Williams, a guy who is NOT a right-wing anything, and CERTAINLY not a bigot, speaking HIS PARTICULAR truth that, if he sees people in Muslim garb on a plane, he gets nervous. What's wrong with something like that? I can see if he said, "If you see anyone Muslim-looking people, you should get nervous." It's not bigoted the way Juan said it. It's especially not bigoted when you consider the standard that folks can run around saying the Tea Party is racist, or dropping the "typical white person" line without beef from the same individuals wanting to crucify someone over ANYTHING that can be considered a slight against Islam. Juan getting nervous is not bigoted. That's not assuming all Muslims are the same. That's the REALITY that Muslims did attack us on 911. Did ALL Muslims? No, of course not. But they weren't just "extremists"; they weren't just "radicals." They were Muslim individuals. You cannot know a person's intentions, and assuming that their intentions are always good and noble and nonthreatening is just as presumptive as assuming their intentions are bad. Only in PC land do these types of statements come across as bigoted.
1 person likes this
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Oct 10
This is PC gone too far, in my opinion, but NPR has a very tight contracts brought on by the Newt attacks in the ninty's.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
21 Oct 10
Standards? That's a load of bull. They're only standards are that you can't appear on Fox News regularly or they will find a reason to fire you. First off, they don't mind displaying bigotry or racism. Just read what's on their own site in 'The Heart of Whiteness' http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5539692 As for someone saying he has nervousness and fear when he sees a group of Muslims on a plane, well frankly a LOT of people feel that way. It was Muslims that attacked us on 9-11 and they did it in groups on planes. Besides, NPR itself broadcasts people saying far worse things about Muslims than simply echoing the common fear of another 9-11 style attack. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130516428
1 person likes this
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Oct 10
There is a difference between NPR news and their call in shows. I listen to them because their news is without opinion and their call in shows get people from all sepctrums discussing issues and no one opinion has priority. I like to make up my own mind about issues and what I think of them so that means very little cable news and very little network news. It gets harder all the time to get the real story and on NPR I get to hear both sides without an agenda.
@elmiko (6630)
• United States
22 Oct 10
news channels can't be like the Walter Cronkite's because if they did they would be too similar. it would not be an accurate enough way to appeal to their particular audience. these news channels try to thrive not just on facts but appealing to the opinions of certain people.
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Oct 10
I guess that is my problem, I define the news by giving both sides of the story. If it has an opinion involved I know I am not wating the news.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
21 Oct 10
It was wrong to fire Mr. Williams. I have enjoyed his commentaries and rebuttals on O'Reilly and Special Report. He is thoughtful and is always willing to look at another side of the question as well as contribute his own opinions--which don't always reflect the "liberal" label that people give him. Juan just voiced what so many of us feel. Although we know that the average Muslim or Middle Eastern person we encounter in everyday life is very unlikely to be a nutjob Jihadist, we feel that way anyhow. 99% of us keep quiet about this out of respect for the majority of Muslims who are peaceful and contribute to society but that doesn't mean we don't experience some trepidation. So when is it a crime to speak the truth? We have the First Amendment here to protect our freedom of speech and NPR, the government run media, has just denied Mr. Williams his right. If this continues we will end up like any dictatorship--speaking our minds only to trusted people in isolated places, in tense whispers and with one eye over our shoulder.
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
21 Oct 10
NPR employees sign a very strict agreement when they sign on. I am not saying that i really disagree with him, we probably all have second thoughts when we see someone in robes at the airport regardless of their religion. I do think it is a little too PC on NPR's part. Npr actually gets very little money from the government since the late 90's. They probably get less then NBC gets in tax breaks. They are mostly supplied by veiwers and grants from private foundations. Ninty something percent.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
22 Oct 10
They get anywhere from $90 million to $420 million in taxpayer dollars. It's a bit hard to nail down because the money doesn't all go directly to them. It gets farmed out to other groups that subsequently pay dues to NPR so it's a type of shell game to hide how much they are really getting. "They probably get less then NBC gets in tax breaks." That's different. NBC pays taxes, NPR does not. The government gets money from NBC, CNN, Fox News, etc. The government only GIVES taxpayer money to NPR and gets nothing back.
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Oct 10
NBC and it's corporate owners gets ton's of corporate tax breaks for multible reasons which used to be illegal a decade ago. General Electric has not paid taxes in years, I did not notice if their name was on the list this year but they are almost always on the top ten list of corporations who did not pay any taxes. Fox is ussually on that list also. That 90 million to 420 million is spread accross all the NPR stations in the nation. The average NPR station gets 1 to 2% of it's funding from the taxpayers the rest comes from it's listners and donations.