How important is National Security to you?

@laglen (19759)
United States
October 28, 2010 8:50am CST
In your opinion is this a top issue? Do you agree with Peace through Strength? Meaning a strong military always ready? Or do you think that National Security is over rated? Should we be keeping up with the enemy? Or spending more on welfare? Here is an interesting document explaining security issues and how your Congress people voted. http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/upload/wysiwyg/article%20pdfs/National%20Security%20Scorecard%202010_1015.pdf
7 responses
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
29 Oct 10
I believe that the National Defense is one of the few things that are of the Federal Governments top concerns as most other things the Feds are getting into are issues that the states themselves can deal with. I think we should let the states run their own Welfare/Social Security Programs if the people in those states want them which me living on the west coast an in Oregon. I know my state would be for having a Welfare type system here. Okay Nation Defense is needed to keep us safe from invaders as for going out invading nations with out a declaration of war from Congress well I think that needs to end as the two wars we are in are more like police actions due to the lack of the declaration of war by congress. I think that the DOD knows how to spend the money to get what they need done and if we allowed our Commanders in the DOD to get the mission done we would of been out of these wars a lot quicker if Washington acted like it did in WWII we would of seen this through already. In order for use to gain a level of national security we need to stop acting like the big brother we have been since WWII as we have issues over here that need to be addressed the borders both North and South need to be secured in a way to not deter trade as trade is good for the economy but to deter terrorist or others that don't want to allow us (Our Governments) to know that they are entering our county. We do need to work on streamlining the process to get into the country as much as possible with out compromising security. So yes National Security is an top issue for the Federal Government to deal with. Our Economy isn't something they know how to fix as throwing money at it doesn't work. FDR had an idea get people working if Obama and the Democrats looked at FDR they would find that he created programs that hired people to work on massive projects that took years not months to complete.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Oct 10
I agree that defense is an actual federal issue. Regarding the economy, i think the fed should get the heck out of the way and let us start businesses, and work.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 Oct 10
I agree, welfare is a state issue. But I also dont think the government should pass out money to start businesses, just stay the crap out of the way.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
29 Oct 10
Yeah the federal government has no idea how our economy works. Hint: Throwing money at the problem doesn't get it moving. What would get it moving is giving money to the people to spend on companies they think are doing good or are worth buying from. And even this would only be a temp fix not one that would fix it completely. If states want a welfare type program its their right to set one up.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Oct 10
I think the more intersting question would have been: Do you want to PAY for a strong national defense? With republicans crying about the national debt, and all of the spending they NEVER mention that they didn't pay for two wars which cost the American people over a TRILLION dollars. The defense budget is still the largest expense in our budget, and always goes up with republicans in office (which I am sure has NOTHING to do with the large donations from the defense industry). So my question to you Laglen is: Are you willing to increase your taxes to pay for a strong military? How about donating your tax return to the government so they can increase the pay for our brave men and women that give their lives to make sure we are all safe? The funny part about this is that the people that want to send our military off to war, HATE paying taxes which go to funding our military. Kind of funny isn't it?
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
28 Oct 10
Actually that is off the topic I chose for this discussion. However inthe spirit of mylot, I will answer. Yes I would be willing to pay more in taxes for the defense. However, first I would want the other crap cut.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Oct 10
I should rephrase the off topic, I meant that that is not what I was looking at. However, since it is here, lets go with it. You certainly can have that all back as soon as all welfare money is refunded.
• United States
29 Oct 10
I don't see how I am off topic, seeing how national security is the largest part of our national budget. The best national defense in the world cost a lot of money, and there are many in this country that don't want to pay for it. Just think of all of those that have off-shore bank accounts, and corporations that incorporate in foreign countries. "However, first I would want the other crap cut." I didn't support the war in Iraq, so does that mean that I can get my tax dollars that were spent on the war back?
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
29 Oct 10
Welfare won't do a nation much good if they are usurped by enemies.. to believe mankind has somehow 'evolved' beyond trying to kill and terrorize others and other nations that is like putting one's head in the sand and being very naive.. Also welfare can only go so far until those on welfare out number those paying for it, then the system collapses which is another form or scheme for overthrowing a free nation.. (i.e. written in the book "rules for radicals")
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Oct 10
very well said thank you!
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
31 Oct 10
It is important to me, but not so important that I am willing to trade off my civil liberties for it. In terms of nationaldefense I do support a very strong military, but not a very large military foot print on the planet. I think there is a distintive difference.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
31 Oct 10
good point and yes a huge difference
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
28 Oct 10
Well, although the touchy-feelies tend to disagree that people are just as inherently bad as they are potentially good, I think the bank without guards in a town without police is going to have an extremely hard time keeping money in the safe. Having them won't necessarily deter a robber, but it certainly stands a better shot.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
28 Oct 10
I agree and great analogy
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
30 Oct 10
I am not a residence in the United State but I don't oppose any strong security imposition because those in the duty of implementing peace in order will make sure every individual is safe. United State is prone from any terrorist attack because of their enemy outside and inside the country. Government officials should strengthen security ties to be sure those terrorist did not distract the peaceful life of every individual citizens or not. If the government spend only on the welfare of the people and protecting it. That welfare will be in vain because someday they are all terribly shock on what is really the effect on unbalance the welfare and security measures.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 Oct 10
exactly!
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
28 Oct 10
I read through the document and found myself "disgusted" with most of the decisions. I was pleasantly surprised to find that my Democratic Rep voted 75% in favor of National Security...but I'm still not voting to re-elect him. He's screwed up too many other times. I am for a strong defense; I am for building a border fence; I am for defunding anything with U.N. in the title... I do believe in Peace through a Strong Defense. When the Army/AF tell you they don't want money for a wind tunnel, then by God listen. If the CIA tells you they don't want money to study climate change, then by God listen. The money we spend on defense could be drastically reduced if our legislators would simply listen to DoD on its needs! You can blame Congress here, not DoD.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
28 Oct 10
I cant argue with you there, our congress makes crap up to spend money on that they dont need. Planes they dont use, etc. Crazy.