unadkat In for Zaheer but probably wont play?
By stardustcdsd
@stardustcdsd (1856)
India
November 19, 2010 4:54am CST
hi friends.
coming as a big blow for team india is zaheer khan's injury.
though it is said to be only as a precaution,it leaves the team vulnerable.
they have called in jeydev Unadket as a replacement for zaheer which is funny.
to give an youngster debut in a series deciding test match with the main spearhead out is unthinkable by indian standards so they will go with sree,ishant,bhajji and ojha .
on the other hand,you go to south africa next month where it traditionally favors pacers and you haven't exactly developed a big pool of young pacers either.
now what is the point of bringing in a replacement who doesn't even get to play?
2 responses
@harry89 (2330)
• India
19 Nov 10
Yea, it is really big blow for india as this is india's final test againt new zealand and the series is still level at 0-0 and india would like to wrap up the series with the win. But as ishant sharma would be going to replace zaheer khan so i think that would be better and he can do better. But i think 3rd test will also be a draw. Happy mylotting. Regards, harry.
@chaitanyap (1)
• India
19 Nov 10
Actually indian team don't have enough stuff in bowling,they have to depend on batting only. spinners have to take lead roll for this slow indian tracks,but bajji look like he is interested in his batting more than his bowling, i think india must move with 5 bowlers
@madhuvamsi (1185)
• India
21 Nov 10
I wonder when will selectors stop this experiments with pace bowlers. When will they settle with one set of pacers. I wonder why Balaji, R P Singh, Pathan, Munaf Patel etc were completely forgotten. I even do not understand why experiment goes on and on. If Unadket is not given chance then it is waste to pick him. But I think he will playing in South Africa rather than he will debut in India. Let us see what wonders that selectors are looking from this bowler. Only time will tell.
