Is it illiteracy, laziness, or just an inability to think?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
December 20, 2010 1:50am CST
When I start a discussion, I usually try to bring up a specific point in a general topic. However, I've found that most comments ignore the specific points, then give me some mindless pat comment on the general topic.
For example, I recently posted several articles about different aspects of the Gays in the US Military issue. Each article covered a different facet of the issue itself. Most of the responses were so generic, they could have been cut and pasted from one to another.
So is it illiteracy, laziness, or just an inability to think beyond buzzwords and tired, redundant catchphrases?
What's worse is when people are so incapable of thinking that they just read the subject line and comment on that.
3 people like this
9 responses
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
21 Dec 10
Thank you for posting this topic. Now I realize that any response I make to a discussion you have posted is going to be critiqued completely changes my previous impression of you as I myLot member. I am not illiterate nor lazy. I respond/comment to a discussion as I see fit. For me posting on myLot is an enjoyable past-time NOT an exam to be corrected for content by a pseudo intellectual. I can assure you I will not be responding to any of your subsequent postings.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Dec 10
Actually, that is why I posted it as a separate article... so I wouldn't have to bore people with mentioning it in comments on other posts.
sorry if actually expecting you to think is offensive to you.
1 person likes this
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
21 Dec 10
Thinking is not offensive to me but insulting comments from someone of your ilk is highly offensive.

@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
20 Dec 10
It is a common problem with people. Even myself has fell into the trap.
You read something, and half way through, you get offended by something and react without reading the other half.
When I started building websites 12 years ago, I was told to keep it short and to the point because people do not like reading anything which is too long. You need to grab people attention and don't bore them with the details. People are only interested by their own interests. They don't really care about what you think, unless it is offensive to them.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Dec 10
Sometimes "all of the above"...?
Just to prove I read beyond the subject line I have to comment on your last sentence...lol...
It really annoys me when people obviously only read the title and maybe the first couple lines before responding. I'd say that's laziness with a bit of illiteracy thrown in for good measure, in my view.
I'm afraid our society is making us unable to think outside of the buzz words and catch phrases. We now live in the world of Twitter where everything is abbreviated or otherwise shortened, including our thoughts.
Annie
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Dec 10
I don't mind so much if the comments are obviously from the first few lines, as long as the writer makes a decent point about what I said. It's more about gross generalities on the topic that show they'd rather hijack the thread than stay on topic.
Btw Annie, I know you read all of the article because you usually go the other way, you often take specific to a whole new level. ;~)
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
21 Dec 10
Simply put, it's all about emotion. People who hold certain types of beliefs on political issues cannot discuss them without emotion. So, if you try to discuss the issue of gays in the military, you won't be able to enumerate logical points and have them debated. For those on the left, the issue involves the word "gay". They can't see beyond that.
I don't doubt the depth of their emotions. Every part of their political philosophy is based on a victim system. All issues come down to victims and victimizers. They feel a sort of guilty obligation to better the plight of the victim. Any suggestion that any group of victims don't have more rights than other, less-victimized groups is going to be met with immediate outpourings of emotion, accusations of cruelty and cold-heartedness on your part and a denunciation of you and anyone else who doesn't view the entire situation from a completely emotional view.
The biggest problem with many of the policies that liberals enact to fix all the problems of the victims is that they usually make the situation of the victim much worse than it was before they enacted their solution.
The other problem, of course, is that in their constant defense of victims and all those rights of victims, they strip rights from others. That is decidedly unconstitutional and just trading in one set of victims for another.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Dec 10
True, I have noticed a new form of "white man's guilt", which could be defined as "heterosexual's guilt". Considering how the issues surrounding Gay Rights have made normally very intelligent people grant gay people almost sainted status.
Apparently it's about the same kind of "logic" where you don't see gay movie and tv characters cast in a negative light. 10 or 15 years of that kind of white washing would make Ted Bundy into a hero.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Dec 10
But I do understand the emotion part.. I get a tad emotional in my comments too. ;~D
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
20 Dec 10
When you start 50 discussions per day, just be happy that people even bother to respond and give you pennies.
I see some folks don't get any responses.
I see some folks don't get any responses. @ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Dec 10
I'd rather get no responses than the same mindless crap.
@joedollarhuat (580)
• Philippines
20 Dec 10
Greetings :)
I honestly think you can't really generalize. We do have to take note that there are people from other countries that don't really practice the English language as often as you and me do. I usually try to respond uniquely and not generically in a discussion because, I believe if I answer generically is like not responding at all. Taking note of how things go, I don't think we should really judge them. At the end of the day, mylot is the one that judges them for their answers. Some go for quantity senseless "no brainer" answers and some go for a few quality answers and the very lucky ones give both quantity and quality.
Have a nice day :)










