Marriage or Live-in Trend

@visavis (5934)
Philippines
December 22, 2010 2:08am CST
Marriage means a sacred action and bows of the two person before living together. It is a very old tradition that until today we are respecting and obeying. It is a bind of the two person. Despite of various culture and tradition around the world marriage are known to all. However, in a modern life one way to call a relationship is bind called live-in. Live-in is an action of the two person living together with out matrimonial of marriage or beyond marraige. May be some of us dis-agree about this that live-in is not the ulitimate solution to test if one relationship will prosper or not. So in your oppinion which of the two you prepare and why? See you around
1 person likes this
7 responses
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
Rings - Rings that symbolizes bondage of two hearts.
In my opinion, live-in trend is just part of the process that manifests into marriage. It's a process of getting-to-know your partner. For me, it's better to breakup while living together than get a divorce after marriage, which is a pain in the neck btw. Live-in trend is important, at least to me, cuz i really wanna get to know the person i'm gonna spend my lifetime with.
1 person likes this
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
First of all thanks to your view. I got your point but in that case woman will be in the danger side because her life is like a fragile things that once broken very hard to return and become like new... is look like unfair if testing method only... see you around
1 person likes this
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
Women aren't fragile anymore. They're strong, actually. And they're not for testing. And maybe you got it all wrong. Live-in is not a testing phase. It's a process. If it doesn't work out then find someone new. If it did then get married. It's like that. The 'testing' you're trying to say is maybe a fling.
1 person likes this
• United States
23 Dec 10
frontvisions101 and visavis you are very right! women arent fragile and they shouldnt be used if your going to move in with someone dont use them if it dont work like the other person said then move out but like frontvisions101 said if it works then get married..
1 person likes this
• Philippines
23 Dec 10
Of course, I go for marriage. I'm a woman, so I know how it feels when you're living with your "loved one" through a live-in relationship. Maybe some are living this way 'cause of financial problems, like less budget for their matrimony. But still, the religious concept of matrimony is necessary wherein it binds the husband and wife with love. I heard that others don't like live-in relationship, 'cause the "chain" of love that binds them together has no assurance. What I mean is that you're not sure if your partner really loves you, or will just be there for you for a short time, then will leave you eventually. In marriage, there's a decision-making that both parties must go through, and with that you can really feel/tell that he/she loves you and will accept you for who you are. And in fact, marriage is the beginning of another stage in your life.
• United States
23 Dec 10
Marriage is not a "chain" nor any kind of "proof". If you can't trust your partner to begin with, then why even consider marrying them? What "decision-making" do you think manifests only when you're married? Living together without or without marriage is absolutely no different whatsoever, nor does marriage actually change anything. I absolutely do not believe that marriage is the "beginning" of anything at all, it's a continuation.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Dec 10
I would never even consider marrying a man without having lived with him first. I absolutely believe that it is vital to know what you're getting yourself into. I don't think marriage is important at all. It's nothing more than a formality, it doesn't actually mean anything.
1 person likes this
@mensab (4200)
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
i still live a in catholic country. any union must receive blessings from parents, community and above all God so that it will be blessed. besides, marriage through the sacrament of matrimony is an endowment of personal and communal responsibility on the union of two people. i see the function and need for a ritual or ceremony to make it official and formal. live-in arrangement does not provide this sense of responsibility.
1 person likes this
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
Hmmm ok you mentioned about responsibility meaning when the couple agree to live together without marriage such responsibility is dis-regard right? But some said that in some cases within the marriage broken family are higher, but in live-in they say it was live longer and happy without problem, do you agree... see you around
1 person likes this
@krieyszel (330)
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
For me, I would prefer marriage before living together because marriage is one of the sacrament of God and it's sacred.It's a bow and blessing to God for your togetherness.It is very important in our life,that should be value everyone.But,as generations changes most of couple right now are committing live-in then some get married later on,but some are stayed in being live-in partner.We all know it's a sin,and not a good model.It's common now a days,but we can not stopped them for committing it because it's not our life.These particular person,doesn't give any significant of the marriage.They let it become natural,maybe they have each reason why they prefer to choose it.As long as,for them they love each other and it's enough. And when,relationship goes obscure they just easily to leave.
1 person likes this
• Romania
22 Dec 10
i agree with you marriage is something scared an no one should ever injure any one time
1 person likes this
@jaiho2009 (39142)
• Philippines
22 Dec 10
hello friend, When a woman marries,she feels that she's the most beautiful woman in the world on her wedding day. Every woman dreamed of a wedding ceremony,each has it's wedding dreams even those women who are in a live-in relationship. Marriage is sacred,the problem is,people/couples behind the marriage/wedding doesn't know the real essence of sacredness in a matrimony/wedding vows. Some couples even made/wrote their own vows from their own words,means,they should be responsible for every words that they've wrote and promised to their partner. Then why some marriages broke?...where are those promises and vows went wrong? Live- in is not considered as sacred since there is no blessing from church nor the legalization from the law (civil wedding) But,it is true that some live-in couples are even more civilized than those married ones. Some live-in relationship lasts long than those binded by the wedding vows and rituals. Before i also condemned lived in relationship,but then again life taught me lessons to learn. And one of the best lesson to learned in this life is your very own lesson. Now i can fully understand why some couples stays in a lived in relationship. For different reasons of course,some don't believed in marriage. Some for trial reason not knowing that they're already living for 50 years happily. Some stays in a lived in relationship because they don't have enough money for the wedding rites (thou mosts localities are now giving free wedding ceremony called "mass wedding" ) Whatever their reason is,i admire those people who are true to themselves,rather than those ones pretending to be happily married while in fact,they just keep living together for the sake of the society status,but the truth is...both are having extra affairs. Married or not,as long as couples are happily living together faithful and honest to their partner,it is in eyes of GOD who are truly married in the real essence of the word "MARRIAGE". HAPPY HOLIDAY