How Many myLot-Friends Should You Have?

@mythociate (21437)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
January 5, 2011 11:38am CST
I understand that it's very-tempting to have an unlimited number of friends, but I want to have time to answer ALL my friends' discussions! As there is a set amount of time in a day, so I should have a set number of friends. The other option to that would involve myLot making a small change in the program (which would require them to buy about twice as much server-space in order to keep the site-speed high): having seperate lists for 'friends' and 'followers'; the 'followers' being people who answer YOUR started discussions, 'friends' being those who YOU answer (the ones whose discussions are fed to your 'friends started'-page). So-for now-we're saying "no" to the second option. How many friends should we limit ourselves to (in order to be fair to all our friends)?
3 people like this
12 responses
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
5 Jan 11
I have never ever considered that there should be a 'right' number of friends or that I add them or that they add me exclusively so that we can respond on each others' topics. I have many friends on my list and it would be impossible that they all respond on mine or that I respond on every one that they start. Being on each other's list means though thst we can contact each other if necessary. I would not like to fix a maximum amount of friends and then have to say 'no, my list is full up' to anyone who requested to be on it at a later date
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
5 Jan 11
Yup I fear so too I just informed another Lotter who will be very disappointed that they did not read things first
• United States
5 Jan 11
@mythociate, what I have noticed lately is some call upon to be friends, okay then post endless discussions, which do get a great deal of responses but never once the originator replies once. But the funny part of this is that then the member will come on here wondering why all the members on their list do not respond. huh, so my thinking is that a great many still believe that posting a discussion earns them for our (the friend) responses.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
You're right (although I think there IS a limit ... a number of friends so exorbitantly high that you'ld have to be cheating to get so-many anyway) ... I guess I'm just being a 'purist,' thinking one shouldn't call oneself a "friend" if all one does is get listed as a 'friend' and then goes inactive to that person.
1 person likes this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
5 Jan 11
There is a kind of natural limit to the number of people any one person can manage in their social circle. It is to do with the amount of information that a person can hold about others in their circle and it is a limiting factor in many social groupings. The numbers vary depending on the intimacy with which people know each other but a common figure for smallish communities such as villages is between 200 and 300. In larger communities one often finds natural groupings of about this number, too. I would suggest that between 200 and 300 friends is all that one can reasonably manage in a social networking site, too. My friends list is currently well over 500 and really needs culling.
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
5 Jan 11
Off-topic* Can you do me a favour and check that your friends notifiers are set as you wish them to be pleae? I have several pages which have set themselves to 'off' and I didn't realise until yesterday
• United States
5 Jan 11
@mysd So true as last week I discovered this as well.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
Good-to-know - that your life touches about 250 others' lives, whose lives each touch 250 others', whose lives touch 250 ... six degrees of seperation!!
1 person likes this
• Canada
5 Jan 11
i don't have friend in mylot hopefully you can add me as my friend
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
5 Jan 11
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
• United States
5 Jan 11
1 person likes this
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
The first step to getting a friend is being a friend.
• United States
5 Jan 11
To be honest I do not know the exact number of friends I have on my list. I suppose I can go to my profile and check. I am one who does not usually turn anyone away and or delete members. I do get countless email alerts from all my friends, but I ultimately make the decision as to who's discussion I will answer, as my reasoning for answering any and or all would a) Can I contribute quality content and or b) Does it fall under guidelines. I am very fair with my friends and answer a great many of them, but again if a or b are applicable. I clean out my alerts daily so I do not have an issue with being bogged down and or over whelmed. I do have several friends who start countless discussions and then do not bother to respond back to the members. But I have been here for a while and many who are not even on my friends list try to keep the discussion flowing without the originator. How many friends should we limit? This is certainly a personal choice and depending on how much time you allot while being on the site. Although I have so many friends I certainly can say I am very fair with each and everyone of them. Thankfully not all of them are active at the same time, so for now my system is working for me.
• United States
5 Jan 11
We can hope, we can help, we can guide, but we can't change how others define "friendships"
1 person likes this
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
Yeah, I guess that's just me wanting 'the way people live' to be the same as 'the way they have written-down' (I just finished Exodus and started Leviticus in my public Bible-readings). I suppose I need to remind myself that 'being on a list of friends' only makes one a possible friend ... a possibility only realized when said list-member DOES the actions of a friend.
1 person likes this
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
Amen. Like Jesus said, "We can only pity the lost who convince themselves that they are right."
@Suggar (3606)
• Bulgaria
5 Jan 11
Hello Mythociate, i don't know the number of my friends, i just don't count them and i don't think that if someone is in my friend list i have to post responds in all of his/her discussions. Sometimes we cross our interests, sometimes not, there is nothing wrong in that. If i have limited time here, as it will be soon, i'll try to participate as much as i can. One "friendship" doesn't mean that we will be around 7/24 responding every time our friends post something. I try to join discussions, which are interesting for me and when i have something to share, as my own experience, i feel that my time here has quality. Not all are for me, so i won't be everywhere, doesn't matter that some of the people are friends.
• United States
5 Jan 11
, yes friendship is not defined but daily up to the minute communication, so as long once in a while one does take the time to be-friend.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
Awesome. So, we need to get all the Suggar we can while 'the getting is good!'
1 person likes this
@Suggar (3606)
• Bulgaria
5 Jan 11
Yep, yep, hurray Some people get close because of exact reasons, friendship, as the girls said up, is not something we can define.
• Belgium
5 Jan 11
I don't like the whole twitter idea, I don't think they should make friends and followers, Because a friend is a friend and you answer each other discussions. I don't like the idea of having to follow your friends, and they should also follow you. That a twitter thing not a myLot thing
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
5 Jan 11
Agrred! I don't like the term 'friend' thrown about so loosely online nowadays. It has taken on a whole new meaning which has nothing to do with friendship at all anymore.
1 person likes this
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
5 Jan 11
'Friend is an action.' That's true both in terms of 'adding to your list' and in 'being there for them.' For instance, celebrities are "everybody's friend" ... they might not even know any of us specifically, but they do 'everything they do' to entertain everybody!
1 person likes this
• Belgium
5 Jan 11
Celeberties are not everybodies friends. It's not because someone is your fan that he is your friend. People can like him, but if the artist doesn't like them then they aren't really friends. It's just like love. If love only comes from one side it isn't real love.
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
6 Jan 11
I think it's a personal choice how we manage our friend lists. so the answer is, whatever you're comfortable list. PS mine is out of control :D
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
Just the way I likes it! lol
@bingskee (5234)
• Philippines
6 Jan 11
i don't think that there is a requirement. it is all up to a my lotter how many friends he or she wants to have. the concept of friend here is subjective. so it really depends.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
right on
• Philippines
6 Jan 11
Hello There, Having a lot of friends is like having a lot of sands in you're hand that will go away someday, friends come and go. I may have tons of friends in the list, but it's only very few people that are considered my friends in this site. some of them i have seen already in person, they' quite cheerful. As for the uh..recommendation, that's the thing you should tell the admin because in my opinion I won't agree to that. Followers? this isn't twitter. no follower option is necessary since every has the choice to respond, comment or not. Personally, I limit myself to those who are active in discussions.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
Yeah (I agree with your 'against', but I have a 'for'-argument anyway) The only thing is, allowing lots of 'friends' (without restricting the 'followers') lets some of the ones who accept you then accuse you of naughtiness when you show them something they can't understand. (It happened to me; I would frequently include 'sneaky links' that could easily be accused of yucky things, and was kicked-out for it.)
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
6 Jan 11
I think you should have as many or as few friends at mylot as you want. It is not so much about quantity as it is about quality instead. mylot is a great place for friendships. the number is up to you.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
Awesome, thank you.
• United States
5 Jan 11
Now, see, I also thought that if someone is your friend that you do them the courtesy of responding to their discussions and vice versa. I did wonder how people with hundreds or thousands of friends ever found time to respond to each of them at any point. I was thinking of starting a discussion about this very thing. How many friends are too many friends? If you have a few hundred or thousand friends do you search out their discussions to respond to them? And do they do the same for you? And if not, what is the true purpose of the friends list? I ask to befriend someone if I thought we had something in common, if maybe we had posted to the same discussion and I liked the way they answered. I would hope that if someone befriends me that they at least took time to look at my profile and maybe saw something that we have in common... enough to want to carry on other discussions with me. I am beginning to see that maybe I am taking the "friend" thing a little to serious, maybe too literally. Up to this point I have tried to search out those on my friends list to respond to their discussions, if I had anything to add to the discussion. I think I will probably end up keeping it that way. It just makes more sense that way.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
6 Jan 11
I think it's easier to think of yourself as a friend of the discussion-topics, to think of friends-listed as 'how friendly you are'
• India
6 Jan 11
I have only one friend help me to make some more......