New Zodiac?

United States
January 13, 2011 5:31pm CST
I just heard about this and I am astounded and confused. The Zodiac has been changed!! AND a NEW one has been added? How does this happen? http://www.fox23.com/news/local/story/Whats-Your-Sign-It-Could-Have-Changed/EAJvf0z93Eeqjb2OR7RW7Q.cspx Capricorn: Jan. 20 - Feb. 16 Aquarius: Feb. 16 - March 11 Pisces: March 11- April 18 Aries: April 18 - May 13 Taurus: May 13 - June 21 Gemini: June 21 - July 20 Cancer: July 20 - Aug. 10 Leo: Aug. 10 - Sept. 16 Virgo: Sept. 16 - Oct. 30 Libra: Oct. 30 - Nov. 23 Scorpio: Nov. 23 - Nov. 29 Ophiuchus: Nov. 29 - Dec. 17 Sagittarius: Dec. 17 - Jan. 20 I was born a LEO and very proud to be a Leo. But now I find out that I may or may not be anymore. My birthday is August 10 So according to this new chart I could be a Cancer or I could still be a Leo. Or does it mean that I am both? Perhaps I am a Cancerous Leo? And if I am a diseased lion does that make me one sick pu$$y? LMAO My son is also confused! His birthday is July 20. So is he a Gemini or a Cancer or both? And whats with this new 13th zodiac? Is it pronounced [Oh-Fu*k-Us]? Where did it come from? Does anyone know what it means for those of us who's birthday falls on a start/end date?
6 people like this
23 responses
• Regina, Saskatchewan
14 Jan 11
Check out this link.............it explains it all in plain English. www.livescience.com/strangenews/your-astronomical-sign.html
3 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
wow! that was also back in 2007 why are we just now hearing about this?
1 person likes this
• Regina, Saskatchewan
14 Jan 11
We are doing the wrong kind of web searches? LOL Maybe we're just hearing about it now because the Astrologers of the world can't keep the info under wraps anymore.............. I always thought I was a Virgo with Leo rising. Seems now, I'm just a Leo too. lol But I'll always think of myself as a Virgo. My Dad's a Leo and so is my best friend, but I'm rather different from them, so this new info just puts all our perceptions into confusion.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
14 Jan 11
I just looked over what Ophiuchus is in Wikipedia. It's a constellation that lies in the southern hemisphere which is in between Scorpio and Sagittarius. Ophiuchus constellation lies opposite of Orion. They say it means as the 'serpent-bearer' or formerly known in English as Serpentarius. If the 13th Zodiac sign does exist, then I'd belong to it.. Whatever that is, I still believe I'm Sagittarius.. ^_^
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
yeah apparently it was named after Imhotep of ancient Egypt why didnt they just call it Imhotep?
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
He probably didn't name it after an Egyptian because he himself was a Roman citizen. The name Ptolemy was used by many of the upper class citizens after Alexander conquered Egypt, and the Egyptians began using the title Ptolemy after 30BC when Egypt became a province. The constellation was never named Imhotep. I was part of the Serpens and named Serpentarius originally as Di pointed out already. Again, to fully know what planets, stars, and sun sign you are and how they play out one needs to have a fully natal chart done.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
15 Jan 11
Does that still make me a Sagittarius? I was born before this astronomical phenomenon occurred.
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Hmmm....Interesting, I have always been a Capricorn. According to this I am now a Sagittarius. Nice to know. lol
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Why don't they change and/or add a new birthstone instead? I would like a different birthstone. Mine is a garnet. Ugh! They are the color of dried blood!
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
I wish they would change birthstones too mine is peridot a very yucky light green
• Canada
14 Jan 11
I think this is a crock! I'm a LEO, like you, through and through. No if's and's or buts about it. Surely, someone is pulling your leg?
• Canada
14 Jan 11
Well, by these dates, I'm still a Leo anyway. I guess the dates just aren't written in stone, and slowly change over time as the earth 'wobbles'. But I still like wtl's pronounciation for the new sign. lmao
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Annie- Check out the links I just posted. It's not a complete crock, it's just that not all Western Astrologist use a Sidereal chart. Namaste-Anora
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
The pronunciation is located on the Wikipedia article I posted. It's not what the person or Fox stated it was. Perhaps Fox News needs a linguist on staff?
2 people like this
@_sketch_ (5742)
• United States
14 Jan 11
This new sign does not change your sign!!! You were still born under a specific sign. This only changes what people may be born under in the future!!!
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
so there is a grandfather clause then?
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jan 11
Yay for grandfather clauses! I'm keeping my sign, no matter what. I -like- my sign, since it's already all screwed up and somehow so appropriate for me. Also, lmao wonttakelong to the diseased lion remark. I so want to quote that on my facebook page, just to see reactions. ::snicker::
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
I'm not sure they can just change it all up like that - but of course that's spoken like a true leo! LOL! I am a leo at heart and it describes me perfectly. Which is why I remain unaffected by the changes as I don't really buy all of it anyway! (see.. told you I'm a leo!)
• United States
14 Jan 11
yep spoken like a true Leo! (you sound just like me hehe)
• United States
14 Jan 11
Oh' my - my... You can boogie but we sure can't fly, we falls with grace and this new thing must be a complete joke I think your phonetic pronunciation of the thirteenth zodiac might be quite correct. *smiles*
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Hello my friend I have missed you!! This new Zodiac has changed my April 24 Taurus sign to Aries!!!! All my life I have been told I was a typical Taurean now I have to change my personality to fit : Aries Traits Adventurous and energetic Pioneering and courageous Enthusiastic and confident Dynamic and quick-witted On the dark side... Selfish and quick-tempered Impulsive and impatient Foolhardy and daredevil
2 people like this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
14 Jan 11
Hi Wonttakelong, Well, nothing changes for me...I'm still a taurus. As for those that fall on the end date that would be like someone on the cusp. My guess would be that you'd have some strong traits from both signs?? I really don't know. How do they change up the Zodiac? That's like re-writing the bible.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
15 Jan 11
HI Wonttakelong, I have no idea how many times the bible has been re-written but a lot.Ok so I'm blonde...guess that wasn't a good example. Anora, Thanks for the info! I really didn't know about this other zodiac until I read it here. I don't watch Fox so missed their breaking news on it. Thanks...I always learn from you.
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
and how many times has the bible been REwritten? LOL
• United States
15 Jan 11
Sid- The two zodiacs have been around for the same time length. This is just another star moment for Fox who had nothing else to report on other then the fact that one of them just realized that the Sidereal zodiac has existed for the same time as the Tropical zodiac. I suppose it's why I take anything Fox states with a grain of salt. Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
14 Jan 11
Weren't there enough problems without them needing to tell us this too? It's like taking away the soil from under our feet How can you be one thing one day and then another the next just because they decide to let us know that things aint what they seemed to be? Where I am I supposed to read the horoscope every morning now that I am no longer, according to this, Acquarius? Fraud! Off with their heads!
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
18 Jan 11
Oh yes Anora, I am aware that the newspaper horoscopes are too vague and generalised to have amything realistic in them. I have my natal chart which was done professionally. Alice I guess it's warmer down there these days
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
yep, off with their heads!!
• United States
14 Jan 11
Diana- It's just typical of FoxNews. It's not "fraud", it's that we typically follow the Tropical Zodiac here in the west though there are a few Western astrologers who use the Sidereal. It's all on which type of astrologer you go to. And the "newspaper" horoscopes are not accurate anyway because each person has their own natal chart with their own influences. It's quite complex. Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
@sconibear (8016)
• United States
14 Jan 11
I call BULLSH1T!!!! What's next? they gonna tell us Pluto's not a planet?
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Pluto is and always a planet! I dont care who says otherwise, they are wrong!
@Opal26 (17679)
• United States
14 Jan 11
Hey wtl! I am as confused as you are! And. WTF? I was born a Libra, and now I am a Virgo! I think not. Who decided to screw up the Astrological Signs after all these years and why now? I read the bs, but don't get it! How do you suddenly decide to change someones sign! I don't fit Virgo! I am totally off balance as any "true Libra" should be. I can't change now, I'm too friggen old and screwed up! What can we do to fix this disaster?
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
It's not a new constellation and some astrologers are already aware of it. It is just that hasn't made the mainstream Western conception of astrology. The constellation was listed by Ptolemy in his 48 constellations. So, it's been there, it's been spoken about, and it's been looked at. This is nothing very new. You can check out this entry that describes it in general: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiuchus (Check out the citation list) http://www.lunarplanner.com/siderealastrology.html In terms of this changing all things, well this is something that most astrologers and occultist have been aware of for almost all of time. It is why Aeons are presided by their respective zodiacal ruler and these change approximately ever 2000 years. In terms of being both signs this occurs to anyone who is born on the cusp. It is called a "cusp sign" and those born on the cusp generally have traits from both zodiac signs. Your typical daily horoscope is not entirely accurate. To get a better sense of how the signs of the zodiac might influence you you'd need to look at a detailed natal chart. Then you have to look at all of the signs on a given day, their positions in the sky, and how they might influence you on any given day. Astrology is extremely detailed and not as cut and dry as people make it out to be. If you want a good site try http://www.astro.com/ for a look at just what people are looking at when they speak about astrological signs, and how they effect us on a given day. It's a mistake to say that astrology hasn't evolved in the last 2000 years. And what do you expect from Fox News? Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Interesting and good stuff... I learned something... All joking aside. Thank You :)
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
before now I was never on the cusp I had both feet firmly planted in Leo-land
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
If the one link was too difficult to understand the tropical verses the sidereal here is a short article I think you'll enjoy. http://www.mybirthchart.com/hotfaq.aspx The bottom line is the tropical is not fixed, and the sidereal is fixed. Have fun. Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
• Canada
14 Jan 11
Why is Scorpio only 6 days now?
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jan 11
uhh..... I am not sure. that seems like such a rip off!
@lingli_78 (12822)
• Australia
14 Jan 11
this is interesting... i had always been a scorpion all my life and now i am a libra... and i realise that with the new zodiac, scorpion has the shortest range of days (only 6 days)... anyway, i'm not really into horoscope and never really pay much attention to this... but it is interesting to know... take care and have a nice day...
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Your sun sign never changes. You are not now a libra. You were born into the sun sign scorpio because that was the sun sign at the time of your birth. If you want a full list I'd suggest having someone do your Natal chart so you can see your exact signs and alignments at the moment of your birth. Even if the Tropical alignments change, your birth charts never change. They are fixed.
1 person likes this
@koalatbs (2229)
• United States
15 Jan 11
Oh weird... the dates do overlap! Hmmm... that is confusing. I was a Leo too but now I'm a Cancer. My birthday is Aug. 7th (close to yours!). The only thing with me is I never though it really fit my personality. I'll have to read up on the Cancer sign and see what it says.
• United States
15 Jan 11
Koala- You are still a Leo because that was the ruling sign at the time of your birth, though to be certain of that you would need to have a full natal chart done. Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
14 Jan 11
Bah, we Capricorns are much too stubborn to change!
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Us Leos are too!
1 person likes this
@missybear (11391)
• United States
14 Jan 11
Still a Pisces but I think it's a bunch of crap really
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
Missy- There are two forms of the Western Zodiac: The Tropical (the one we typically follow), and the Sidereal. They are both valid, but the Tropical does change as the Earth's tilt changes. The Sidereal stays fixed. Of course, what was typical of FoxNews is they treat this like it's something new (it's not, quite old actually), and they forget about all the other zodiacal studies. Namaste-Anora
1 person likes this
@gaiza12 (4884)
• Philippines
19 Jan 11
I am a proud Leo as well. I am not really affected by this news if it is true or not for i still will be Leo no matter what astrologers have to say. I think this news needs more study and it's a bit confusing as what you have pointed out, we can not have two Zodiac signs at the same time right? I mean that is just not accurate. I have heard that the 13th sing is a star which was already in the constellation but wasn't included in the zodiac signs because there should only be 12. Well i am not 100% sure of what i have heard but it's what i understood.
1 person likes this
14 Jan 11
how could that happened? so my zodiac now is libra?
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Jan 11
No. You are the same sun sign you were born into.
1 person likes this