Prs. Obama condemns Libya for the violence, but never once condemns Qadaffhi...

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
February 24, 2011 12:23pm CST
or his role in the violence. Apparently to Obama, "Libya" is attacking the people of Libya. Also, we have all heard Obama when he is riled up and feels strongly about something. We've also heard him when he's simply making a prepared statement that he feels he needs to make. There is nothing in his voice or demeanor that conveys any emotion whatsoever. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX-vu4VUsXs In case you don't know the difference between Obama speaking with conviction and him just reading a speech... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLRCdmeepwc
2 people like this
6 responses
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
24 Feb 11
Obama has made it very clear where his loyalties are.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
25 Feb 11
I'll put this up here so everyone can see it. Someone else may have already pointed this out so forgive me if I am repeating something so obvious. THERE ARE AMERICANS WHO HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET OUT OF THE COUNTRY YET. Should *their* president put them in more danger than they're already in while they're stuck in that country? I think not.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Again, you misunderstand. I was not, and will never advocate going to war or putting Americans in jeopardy. His speech lacked the moral outrage one should feel when a leader kills his own people. He has monetary ties to Qaddafi. He doesn't want to offend this despot who kills his own countrymen. THAT is what I meant.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Again, you misunderstand...my response wasn't directed entirely at you but at the OP as well and I didn't want it to sit at the bottom of the thread somewhere. The President has an obligation to ensure that AMERICANS are out of harms way before he says anything that could put them in more danger than they are already in. I'm not referring to our military...I'm referring to the American citizens who are currently trying to get out of the country and have been delayed by the weather. They are in airports and on a ferry stuck at port and are vulnerable right now. It would be foolish for our president to come down hard on Qaddafi while our fellow citizens are still in his country and could become targets based on his words. The first priority is to get all Americans out of there...they are innocent civilians...teachers, etc.
@yoyo1198 (3641)
• United States
25 Feb 11
While those who have responded to this post are so adamant in their condemnation of Obama, they are discounting the diplomacy efforts that are being made behind the scenes of this devastating situation in Libya. The administration of necessity has to show a public face and respond to the revolution in a general public manner. The president of the United States cannot stand up in front of international news agencies and call the leader of another country a crazy man. That is not protocol. Is that what you all want him to do? He has publicly condemned the violence and encouraged the Libyan administration to cease and desist with killing their own citizens. We still have Americans in that country who are sitting ducks should Qadaffhi become offended enough to bomb that ferry or take aerial potshots at them. Diplomacy is going through the appropriate channels to investigate the possibility of declaring a no-fly zone over Tripoli and environs. Diplomacy is talking with the UN and other nations about the possiblity of action to defend the Libyan citizens. We do not know what all is taking place behind the scenes and it is premature of us to be lambasting our president and the administration for not doing things when we don't know what they ARE doing. I am ashamed to hear and see Americans taking such a negative attitude about all of this when we just don't know. Please reserve your hateful judgements until the crisis is resolved and you actually know what all has been done.
@Adoniah (7512)
• United States
25 Feb 11
One does not negotiate with Qaddafi....
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Adoniah, Libya was under sanctions in the past but Qaddafi started to play nice and they were lifted...I don't remember how long ago. The wisest move for all of the leaders of the world to make has been to condemn the violence, try to end it by talking and to work towards getting the citizens of their various countries safely out. Now that they are out we are learning that the U.N. Security Council is in session discussing what actions they will take, the U.S. has announced the suspension of diplomatic operations in Libya, has announced it's own sanctions as have other countries and Libya's assets around the world have been frozen. These plans were put in place behind the scenes for the safety of the people who needed to get out.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Feb 11
I guess I don't trust Obama's behind the scenes anymore than I trust what he says and does in public. In fact, it is what may be going on behind the scenes that frightens me most about his administration. A leopard cannot change its spots.
@Adoniah (7512)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Hussein Obama has TOO many close ties to people who are BEST BUDDIES of Qaddafi. There is no way Hussein Obama is going to do a thing for the people of Libya and damage his ties with Qaddafi and friends. The old saying "cutting off your nose to spite your face" comes to mind. Hussein did get his campaign money from somewhere in the Mideast...it certainly did not all come from here. Of course since most of it came via the internet no one will ever know how much he received or where it actually all came from.
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
24 Feb 11
The people of Libya were very disappointed, I heard. They thought they would get some support from the prez but he may as well have not said anything. What a disappointment he is, what a disaster his presidency has been. We'll be in awful shape by election time. I really don't know what I expected him to say, though. I don't want our soldiers in another conflict and I think we should stay out of everyone's business but the way the Middle East is burning up right now I wish someone would be able to do something. Kadaffi is murdering his own people.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
25 Feb 11
There's a process before any country can take military action against another. The U.N. Security Council is discussing the situation in Libya at this very moment. There is a U.S. base nearby and establishing and enforcing a "no fly" zone over the country has already been mentioned as something that can be done quickly. Further action may come depending on what the U.N. decides but so far it looks like heavy sanctions worldwide are likely.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Perhaps that is the pressure to act that I spoke of. How can he deny cooperating with the UN? Sorry, I know you totally disagree with me Spalladino, just call me the eternal cynic when it comes to Obama.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Feb 11
Those protesting in Lybia smuggled a tape of heavy gunfire (audio) being fired on the people in the streets to the AP. I heard it. Screams and all. We went into Iraq to topple a dictator who was killing his own people. Why do we stand mute when Iran and now Lybia does the same? I am torn, I do not want us to get involved either. But somehow I have to think that the people of Lybia, and in Iran after the election are wondering where is the 'beacon of democracy' now?
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
24 Feb 11
I read somewhere that it's because Obama's former church and 'Pastor'(and I use the term loosely) Wright was close to Qaddafi, along with Louis Farrakhan. Apparently old Qaddafi Duck gave them quite a bit of money and supported their tax evasion, er, I mean, 'church'. In fact, I think last time Qaddafi came here he visited Calypso Louie in Chicago.
• United States
24 Feb 11
You are very correct. I have posted some more detail on Obama's connection to Quaddafi in my response.
@puccagirl (7294)
• Israel
24 Feb 11
I guess he is trying to cover himself and US Foreign Policy in case he stays in power? Just a guess though...