The Death of American Economy

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
March 11, 2011 7:52am CST
More than one out of three people receive government paychecks or support. It is extimated that as much as 40% of Americans are supported by the government. These are figures given by Ben Shapiro, a graduate of UCLA and Harvard, host of The Ben Shapiro Show in Orlando FL. He writes: Socialism leads to economic decay. The physics of a decaying economy is like the physics of a dying star: it can explode outward or collapse inward. Since there are no more worlds to conquer, the economy can only collapse inward, as it has in Greece, Ireland and Spain. Who, then, will support the angry masses that march for their "pay" checks? No one. The coming economic storm will be cataclysmic in its effects. Governments may topple. The population may suffer. This is the legacy of a left, which has purposefully grabbed a tiger by its tail and promised it slabs of raw taxpayer meat. Eventually, the meat will run out, and the tiger will still be hungry. Read the full article at: http://www.creators.com/conservative/ben-shapiro.html We're in trouble folks. It's not a matter of IF but WHEN the economy will tank out. I for one am sick of all the excuses given as to why someone 'deserves' this or that. I'm pretty ticked off that my grandchildren's future will NEVER be secure. I don't look forward to the upheaval this impending collapse will bring about. How do you feel about this. Are you ready? Do you believe it's coming?
3 people like this
5 responses
@laglen (19759)
• United States
11 Mar 11
I have really missed the boat. I need my government :paycheck". I agree, we are in serious trouble and if it isnt put in check soon, I am afraid of what may happen
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
11 Mar 11
I am not complaining about disability or vet benefits or even help in time of dire need. I am a Christian and believe that we are responsible for our brothers. What I am complaining about is the feeling of entitlement that pervades the American consciousness. From your excellent posts I am sure you do not feel as if you should be taken care of by big brother, laglen. I fear for those who truly must have some help. For if the democrats drive for even more spending keeps up, there will be nothing left to give, if there even is now.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
11 Mar 11
heck no! The government big enough to give you everything is also big enough to take everything away. I will just keep puttering along, taking care of myself.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
12 Mar 11
I think you both missed the main point of Shapiro's article. He's not complaining about government assistance programs or Social Security...his issue is with PUBLIC unions. It's getting worse. The 60 percent of American workers who do not live off the taxpayer dime shrinks as public unions suck up more and more money — why work for a small business when you can work for the biggest business in the country, the government, and receive a wonderful pension and excellent benefits? Taking taxpayer cash means that you don't have to produce anything worthwhile, don't have to create a profit for your boss and don't have to meet any performance standards. All you have to do is breathe. And avoid government cutbacks. There are many, many industries in this country...some of them have union representation while others don't...but they're not all PUBLIC UNIONS as is the case with the big fight in Wisconsin. Shapiro is making the very erroneous claim that there are plenty of government jobs there for the taking. There aren't. He seems to believe that there are only two types of businesses in this country...small independent ones and public union government jobs. This is simply not the case.
1 person likes this
• Canada
14 Mar 11
I'm not so sure socialism will cause an economy to topple. I freely admit that I don't understand a lot about the intricacies of economics, but comparing Canada, which is far more socialist than the States, and seeing that our economy has not toppled, and even did really well during the recession, that's the conclusion I draw. But the States is set up quite differently, and it may be that the way the pieces of the puzzle interact for you mean that socialism will never work the same way there as it does for us Canucks. I'm sure you've seen me say elsewhere that our public systems are far from perfect and could use a lot of improvement, so I'm not bragging or saying Canada is way better than the States or anything, just pointing out some differences.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
14 Mar 11
Perhaps it is not necessary that Canada fail as it is necessary for America to fail? Not being sarcastic or implying Canada is less important, only that America used to be the superpower that maintained some sort of leadership in economics. Now we are facing the devaluing of the American dollar. Investigate what that would do to the American economy, I will warn you, it's very scary.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
14 Mar 11
Don't worry, in private conversations with folks around here about what they will do if we enter a great depression, some of them have said they'd move to Canada and live off the land. They seem to have this perception (probably from the Viet Nam era) that you can hide very effectively in the north woods. This is a joke btw...
• Canada
14 Mar 11
Interesting. The U.S. has ten times our population as well, which must have an effect.
@kenzie45230 (3560)
• United States
11 Mar 11
Benjamin Franklin warned that we shouldn't do too much for people. Shoot, there's an ancient proverb that also tells us that if we "give a man a fish, you feed him for a day; teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." [i] I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, I observed in different countries that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the lest they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves and became richer.[/i] (Benjamin Franklin, November 1766 Our children and grandchildren are not being taught to fend for themselves. They're being taught that there is always a government program to "fix" things and if there isn't, just complain to a Democrat and they'll make a new program with hundreds or thousands of employees. (Think about the cash for clunkers program. Thousands were hired to work that failure.) Our founding documents tell us that we should have equal opportunities to pursue happiness. The government cannot define happiness; that is something different for each and every one of us. And "pursuit of happiness" requires that we get out and do something, not that we sit at home waiting for government help. Schools no longer teach about the wisdom of our founders. Obviously, they're not teaching much math either, because I've actually had liberals tell me that the "rich" (defined by them, of course) should pay 110% of their income. Seriously. So many people are going about their lives in la-la land, thinking that anyone who is concerned about the economy is from some kind of "doom and gloom" cult. Some refuse to believe that we're in trouble. At another forum yesterday, I had a college professor tell me that the U.S. is not broke because we're still spending and we're still able to borrow from other countries. I'm sure he believes that. So, when we're no longer able to borrow, will he finally wake up? Will others?
• United States
26 Mar 11
I just noticed that you gave me best response. Thanks!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
12 Mar 11
I just wonder what we'll do if the dollar is devalued and China calls in her chips.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
26 Mar 11
@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
1 Dec 12
Noooooooo...! It's not gonna happen... it's just not going to happen! If the US economy collapses & we down here have invested far more in the US than we have in any other country in the world, then where does that leave us? Hang on... just noticed this discussion was two years old... is it still relevent today, in the current situation? If so, read on, or else look away now! From here, correct me if I'm wrong, the US will turn the economy around very, very quickly from now on. Why? 1. The fiscal cliff thing... looks like there's now 100% chance of a 50% deal. Reading through that long speech of Ben Bernanke's, I get the impression that it doesn’t matter much what they agree on, so long as they agree on something, then the economy will be alright. If they don’t agree & the various pieces of legislation and sunset clauses kick in, then there'll not only be a 5% of GDP jolt to the economy, but also a catastrophic collapse in confidence in the ability of the nation’s leaders to be sensible – to even lead at all. That will as big an effect, and a more lasting one, than the fiscal contraction.What I mean is that, the deal will involve some revenue increases (not actual tax increases but loophole closures) and some spending cuts. There’s no way the US administration and Congress will do nothing at all to cut the deficit. The full cliff would represent a hit to growth of 5% of GDP; more likely is a hit of 1-2% and a longer term strategy to reduce the deficit. The good news is that the lift to business confidence from a resolution of the fiscal cliff uncertainty will almost certainly offset any reduction in government spending or increase in tax payments. 2. "Shale Gale". Says it all. We're the really stupid ones exporting the stuff by the shipload & charging our people export parity prices. In the US, the appearance of abundant cheap energy and the housing turnaround has been incredibly sudden. In the blink of an eye the US has gone from wallowing in the total collapse of the housing, finance and manufacturing sectors to an extraordinary renaissance of manufacturing, a rebound in housing and the steady recovery of banking and finance. America now has cheap money and cheap energy, probably the cheapest in the world of both. The effect of that on house prices and manufacturing investment can hardly be a surprise. 3. The US has a young, fit & well-educated workforce... just gunning to go. Down here, ours & Japan's workforce & population is very much aged in comparisson. 4. The US has the world's strongest corporate sector as well as housing the world's innovation headquarters. Lady, the way we see it, you'll be in boom times again before you know it, so get ready!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Dec 12
There's opinion on both sides of the issue. Some say we will collapse into the dark ages lol, and some say, as you have, that we will bounce back easily. Over the last two years I've read and researched much on not just our economy, but on our total culture and governmental policies. I am NOT optimistic as you are, about America's future. So many things effect the economy. We are seeing many small businesses closing, cutting back on expanding, cutting back on number of employees. Investors are pulling out of the stock market as we anticipate higher taxes on dividends and now we're told the government may step in and take over the management of private retirement funds. Have you ever read about the Cloward Pivens Strategy? Early 60s radicals wrote of overwhelming the welfare/social saftey nets so as to purposefully collapse the system, to give reason to fully turn us to socialism. You can read about it here: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7522 There are many who see what Obama is doing as the implementation of this strategy.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Dec 12
Seeing the goings on from THAT viewpoint may tend to make one turn to religion, afterall, those facing an apocolypse often do so.
• Adelaide, Australia
2 Dec 12
Yikes! Really? Yes, I have a very distant viewpoint from down here. We're seeing all the bad stuff down here that you've described & more besides. At least you guys have some light at the end of the tunnel. We've got zero & getting worse by the minute.
• United States
12 Mar 11
I agree we are on a crash course and not many people seem to care. Politicians at all levels say "we need to cut spending", "we need to balance the budget" but neither side is willing to get serious about making those cuts. The American people yell if their money is threatened but yet they cry out to their leaders to do something! We can't have it both ways. Cuts are going to have to be made. It will be painful for everyone but unless it is done, I do not see much hope of avoiding the collapse. I'm tired of both republicans and democrats, including our President, who talk out of both sides of their mouth. Quit talking and start doing.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
4 Jun 16
@debrakcarey I think we probably disagree on who we least want to be able to "buy" our elections, with you not wanting the unions to have any influence and me not wanting the Koch or Trump types in control, but in general I'm in favor of getting "big money" out of our elections completely. Small individual contributions of as little as a couple bucks add up fast of someone has the right message and if the media were to give away "free airtime" to ALL candidates the way they have been for Donald Trump this past year it wouldn't cost in the billions to run a campaign.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
12 Mar 11
I agree. We can't have it both ways. Gov. Walker is facing recall because he was brave enough to try to cut spending. The people who are crying out against the 'wealthy' running things, are upset now because the unions won't be 'wealthy' enough to fund Obama in the next election campaign. Does that make any sense? If it is wrong for one to use money as an influence in the election, it is wrong for ANYONE to use wealth (money) to influence the election.