Why not Harbhajan In the last over ..?

India
March 12, 2011 11:31am CST
South Africans are not good players of spin and Harbhajan had also bowled really well till then.. Then why not him..? On the other hand I thought Peterson grown in confidence when he saw seamer bowling .. What do you think..?
1 person likes this
3 responses
sajujohn
@sajujohn (1005)
• India
12 Mar 11
I too thought that the last over will be handed over to Harbhajan but as usual Dhoni searched for the miracle.But this time it didn't worked.Harbhajn Singh was bowling well and I can't understand why Dhoni didn't asked him to bowl the last over.Till that Harbhajan was testing the batsmen with his flat deliveries.If he had given a chance, I am sure that six and four wouldn't have been gone.
soumya005
@soumya005 (170)
• India
12 Mar 11
Captain cool made the wrong choice.. It's heard to always keep your cool.
Vivek Pujara
@vbpujara (646)
• Rajkot, India
12 Mar 11
you are right,i agree with you.it was really bad decision to give last over to Nehra,Spin attack could definitely change the game by Harbhajan's variation and experience. we can surely say match was open till 49th over bowled,but last over changed game.
soumya005
@soumya005 (170)
• India
12 Mar 11
Yes that was not good captaincy..
tareen63
@tareen63 (57)
• Bangladesh
13 Mar 11
Dhoni made a bad decision and get his result.vajji is great in slog over though it is last over............