I wasn't aware that the textbook was paid to teach the class.

@megamatt (14292)
United States
April 17, 2011 11:45am CST
I think its a good idea to read your assigned readings and take notes. However, without added instruction from the teacher, it can be a bit overwhelming. That is why it agitates me when a teacher states that there should be no need for questions if we read the text book. Well while it can be clear, there are sometimes there is an added bit of explanation from someone who should in theory know their subject. Then again, that theory is being less sound with teachers now than ever before. A lot of my teachers are great, if you demonstrate that you actually do read the assigned readings but there are a few, that makes me wonder if the teachers could even point out where in the textbook that there was an explanation if I needed clarification.
1 person likes this
4 responses
18 Apr 11
Books are good. They help us gain a lot of information. However, we do need to learn from teachers' experience! Sometimes, experience is even more useful than knowledge.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
18 Apr 11
Teachers giving us the benefit of their experience is a really good thing a lot of the time. Books can be great, research on our own can be good but it can only explain so much. That is where a great teacher comes in. If they can explain something a little better, than it will nudge the student in the right direction and only good things can happen. Thanks for responding. Its appreciated. Have a nice day.
19 Apr 11
No problem ;-) The topic is good.
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
17 Apr 11
Textbooks should be where the teacher guides the students to gather the information and knowledge they need to study. Students need more than textbooks to learn. They also need the teacher to reinforece that learning. if all we needed was the textbook, students would be teaching themselves.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
17 Apr 11
Yeah, I doubt many students would get too far, if they were just teaching themselves. Granted, some might be able to do fine. But while some only need minimal impact from the teacher, others might need a little more help. The teacher doesn't need to lead the students by the hand but at the same time, they should be right around, to lend a hand when needed. Thanks for responding. Its appreciated. Have a nice day.
18 Apr 11
I agree with you. Not all school lessons are understandable without a teacher's explaination.
• United States
17 Apr 11
I guess it differentiates from grade levels. My thinking is that while in college they do expect the students to independently learn. However, when I was in college we did have offers for online teacher assistance and or questions during class. I feel that one definitely should not sole depend on the teacher but if one has questions they should be clarified in class. Otherwise then why have a teacher at all. The teacher in my opinion is there to guide and help, so asking questions is beneficial, especially if one does not understand the lessons. Teachers in my opinion also should be able to point out in the books the subjects at hand as it would also show they too understand what they are teacher. Students should not depend on the teacher alone but I feel teachers should also be an addition to helping.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
17 Apr 11
Yep, teachers should be able to lend a helping hand or at least point the student in the right direction in a clear matter. If all else fails, we should be able to get to the teacher. It is possible that while it was explained in the book and perhaps some might be able to figure it out, not everyone has. Teachers should be able to answer questions when needed. Students should not have to completely rely on the teacher however. Thanks for responding. Its appreciated. Have a nice day.
@sashakiddo (1102)
• United States
19 Apr 11
Yeah, either we shouldn't have to pay for classes or the teacher should show some real expertise and communicate about the subjects rather than just going over the book. I had a teacher on study abroad who lectured for the whole class period- we didn't even need to read a book because he was so good at explaining everything. It did require quick note-taking skills and listening skills, which was hard because I was so accustomed to reading and taking notes on my own time. Both ways of teaching have their benefits and difficulties.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
19 Apr 11
I think it is really good to know both sides and have a wide variety of skills. Because there are some subjects that require plenty of explanation and those that are far more independent. Therefore, one should be able to do both. I try to a lot of the time, I know that. Still if the teacher is not able to explain things, then what good are they. Thanks for responding. Its appreciated. Have a nice day.