what if???

United States
June 23, 2011 12:13am CST
So what if the world didn't have money? I mean really do you think that it could work. What is money anyway. I have made my fair share of it, but what's behind it really uncover it. What if there was no more money. What if money was completely taken out of the system and everyone still worked to live. What if everyone had everything they needed because they were able to work for it. So let's take into consideration the ones that can't work, right? What if they instead of working physically worked mentally or the ones that couldn't work mentally were just given what they needed because it would be a community. The people that take care of them would work so that everyone had what they needed. Nothing more nothing less. Everyone would have what they needed and nothing more. Do you really think that this would be bad? It would be like a large community. If you really think about it it is not that bad because in reality what is every fight over? What is every debt over? What is every power struggle over? So let's say one nation wanted to have a bigger military well they need more of what? Money that's right! The idea is that everyone would do something for themselves. It would completely do away with crime. 90% of the conflicts would be done and over with, and people would have a much bigger sense of community because everyone would still be doing what they are doing only for the bigger picture. Seems much more nicer to me, it could really work, but hey what do i know, right? What do you think?
2 people like this
4 responses
• United States
24 Jun 11
Your ideas basically sound similar to communism. Besides, we can't all produce everything we need for life in a modern world. This is pretty much a pipe dream, the idea sounds great in theory, but it could never work in practice. Why? Human nature. People are greedy and would steal whatever bartered goods were available, and it would cause war and hate. In ancient times, people didn't have money, yet this perfect world didn't evolve. Anyway, this seeming utopia would quickly reveal its dystopian characteristics. For more on this, try reading the book "The Giver" by Lois Lowry, or "Brave New World" by Alduous Huxley, or "Anthem" by Ayn Rand. This kind of society will never work.
• United States
24 Jun 11
Yes it is the idea of communism in a system, but honestly what would be wrong with it. A "Pipe Idea" is a lot better than a group think session where we come up with the idea of giving paper for intangible goods. Yes people are greedy but why? What drives a man to steal bread for his family? Bartering yes that is all fine and dandy, but we've been trying this, how has it done for everyone? Is anyone on here in a separate social status because of their bartering? Or are we all upper class individuals? It is impossible to say that something would never work if it has never been tried before. Take for example a complete civilization in Asia. One that has been hidden from most of the world, yes they are still living, and they didn't need money for it either. How ancient are you speaking of because the form of money was supposed to be an upgrade for bartering and now it has created an entire different set of problems. Everything has it's penalties and downfalls, but if you can't grasp the concept of the original idea then you cannot even be on the same level with someone and speak of it. Yes people are greedy why? Because they want more money, they want a different social status, they want they want etc. They want is what it leads down to. It is all based upon a norm that has been brought about through many generations, the never ending struggle. What if though, what if it was not like that? If money was never introduced into a system they could care less about it. It was introduced into our system and now....we want. Seems to me if people want to change the way that we live and change the system so much then it should start with the beginning and not how to fix the end of it.
23 Jun 11
Money is simply a publicly accepted stand-in for the barter system. Instead of offering your services or goods in exchange for something, you get money instead. That way, you don't have to live somewhere where people need your services. The system you suggest has a name - communism. It's a beautiful ideal: to each according to their need and from each according to their ability. Unfortunately it doesn't work in the real world because people are greedy: for material possessions, for power, for influence or for something else. Personally, I love the idea - as you say, it would solve most of our problems if it worked. I still remember something my dad once said about gambling that extends to almost every arena: "If sports and other gambling were illegal, people would bet on something stupid, like if it's going to rain." Humans will always find something to argue and fight about, unfortunately, until they realise that we're all the same when it comes down to it.
• United States
24 Jun 11
I completely agree with you. It is an awesome idea. I understand that people are greedy but with my idea there would be no need because the stuff that people is greedy for would not exist. Everyone would have everything that everyone else does. You would have exactly what you need. Come to think of it I don't think that people would turn greedier I think that they would eventually ween themselves out of that situation because they would know that everyone is equal. I guess I am just an out of the box thinker. I do realize that there are many people out there that would disagree with me on this, but if you really think about it, it's not that bad. I think that it would completely take crime down to a level that would be unimaginable, and well with gambling you are right, but hopefully it wouldn't occur. People will always be people and I guess that I just have to get that. Thanks for the response, I'm glad you like the idea too.
• Philippines
23 Jun 11
if there's no money, we'll go back to barter system i don't like the "slave" idea of working for someone as long as he/she will provide everything i need... crimes and power struggles won't cease if the people in a community are still greedy and don't have a pure heart
• United States
24 Jun 11
The "Slave" idea is what we have now. Unless you don't work and pay your bills and purchase what you want with the rations that you receive. That basically is what it is now. The idea that we're speaking of is completely different it is of a system that doesn't have anything other than the bare necessities. Why would anyone need anything that they don't truly need? Let me ask you something. If you have never heard of an IPhone would it mean anything to you? The answer is that it wouldn't mean a thing to you because it wouldn't exist. Same difference. So if everyone had what they needed and performed their work the same because they enjoyed doing it instead of just doing it as a "slave" as many laborers are now, there would be more of a satisfaction knowing that you are helping and that what you do does make a major difference. It's like it takes a community to raise a child. Everyone pitches in in one way or the other to assist. Same idea just with different contexts. When you think about actually think about it, yes it does have flaws, but they are microscopic compared to what we have now.
• United States
23 Jun 11
your imagination is good but all know it never can be reality.why? you write what if everyone is given what they needed nothing more nothing less.human being is not satisfied in what they have if it would be like that then they would also be like all other animal who live for food. the reason for the development of human is there need for more,they always want more they are never satisfied with what they have.the life will become boring if it is like that because you have to do nothing. you can feel happy when you have experienced sadness.if you never experience sadness then you would never know what is happiness.right? now the second thing about money.many years before when there was not in the system then people worked with interchanging the things what they have.like one have grain in his farm and other have fruits in his farm then they will interchange it and have what want.
• United States
24 Jun 11
How would life become boring? It would be the same as life now. There would be no difference. You would still perform your work and still do what you are supposed to do, the only difference is that you would have more satisfaction from doing it because you would be doing it for your families and your needs. What are we doing now? We go to a job every week to receive more paper, right? In the hopes that we'll make more this week than last, or that we'll climb the corporate ladder. Why? To be a different social status? To fit into a higher class? Why does it matter? I have experienced money, and honestly if I had my receipt I would take it back. If you have never experienced a world without money then how can you say that it wouldn't work? Why does anyone fight? Do you like to fight? I mean honestly does anyone like to be hurt by someone else? I don't think so. Whether it makes sense now to you or not it will eventually. So let's evaluate the theory of the farm. One farmer enjoys farming grain, ok. One farmer wants fruit, ok. What is so hard about that. Why would they not be satisfied? The requirement is that they produce for their communities, it is not that they aren't allowed to farm one or the other. Yes everyone would have their set positions, and they can climb the ladder still or not, it's whatever they want to do. The education system would be at it's highest, world round. Everyone would have the best educations, everyone would have the best meals. You would work for your keep. There's nothing wrong with that.