Human Act vs. Act of Man

We call an activity human -- when it is beneficial for others and society and not only for the person who starts or initiates. Act of man --is aimed at helping him - selfish acts. these are not aimed at the welfare of others. For Example -- writing an article for a newspaper, or a website - act of man. Writing/contributing in mylot - human act!! Anyhow another angle look at this: Human acts are imputable to man so as to involve his responsibility, for the very reason that he puts them forth deliberatively and with self-determination. They are, moreover, not subject to physical laws which necessitate the agent, but to a law which lays the will under obligation without interfering with his freedom of choice. Besides, they are moral. For a moral act is one that is freely elicited with the knowledge of its conformity with or difformity from, the law of practical reason proximately and the law of God ultimately. But whenever an act is elicited with full deliberation, its relationship to the law of reason is adverted to. Hence human acts are either morally good or morally bad, and their goodness or badness is imputed to man. And as, in consequence, they are worthy of praise or blame, so man, who elicits them, is regarded as virtuous or wicked, innocent or guilty, deserving of reward or punishment. Upon the freedom of the human act, therefore, rest imputability and morality, man's moral character, his ability to pursue his ultimate end not of necessity and compulsion, but of his own will and choice; in a word, his entire dignity and preeminence in this visible universe. Example: Human acts- action that is guided by reasons or actions that can be limited. example: exercise to be physically fit, etc... Acts of man- instinctive; physiological. example: crying, falling in love, eating, etc... Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_different_is_human_acts_from_acts_of_man#ixzz1QOKhIzwl