I'm betting these are "fighting words" to Lennon's most pacifist fans.
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
5 responses
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
30 Jun 11
I've never really paid that much attention to a celebrity's politicial musings, especially a rock and roll musician's.
When you're high as a kite and have the entire world at your fingertips, it's very easy to "imagine" a world where people simply share everything and hold nothing as sacred but their fellow man.
I don't know a lot about Lennon. I won't box him up. It could be that Carter sucked so much that Reagan just started to shine on in Lennon's mind.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jun 11
For a guy who doesn't know about Lennon, you sure worked in a lot of punny references ;~D
1 person likes this
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
30 Jun 11
His music, sure. But as far as his personality, I have no clue.
I watched some documentary one time where he dropped the C-word on Paul repeatedly, but that's probably the only time I've ever seen him or heard him outside of one of his songs. Well, unless you count the edit job they did with him on Forrest Gump.2 people like this

@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
29 Jun 11
I read this article earlier today. I doubt that Lennon became a true conservative, but it's good to think that as he got older, he matured in thought and perspective. At some point, reality kicks in and the person who has grown in wisdom and knowledge realizes the world doesn't change because of slogans, your enemy won't become your friend because you implore him to love everyone and real change means real hard work and solutions that require more than fanciful phrases. I don't think it's beyond belief that he was fed up with Carter and liked Reagan - didn't everyone feel the same way?
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jun 11
Yeah, we'll have to see how this story plays out. I know a lot of the current conservative talk show hosts were once extremely liberal, so I know people can change... but how big a change did Lennon go through, I don't know.
1 person likes this

@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
4 Jul 11
Perhaps he realized it doesn't require liberalism to attain world peace.. also most liberals have no idea what conservatives are like, having been fed and also educated the common bias, which is nothing more than a new spin on the oldest game.. the blame game.. Perhaps he saw through the spun dream to reality.. but alas, peer pressure may have stalled him a bit.. or perhaps the spinners were watching him (also)..
@urbandekay (18278)
•
1 Jul 11
Money is power, power tends to corrupt. Nuff said
al the best urban
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Jul 11
Sid, this is interesting, what makes you think he couldn't have been a peace activist and a Republican? All the guy in the article said is that Lennon was a bit ashamed of his radical activities in the past, and that he had conservative views.
It's as interesting an attitude as Urban's assumption that supporting Reagan somehow equals corruption.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
2 Jul 11
Ok, clarification seems to be in order. What I mean is that as Lennon got rich and therefore powerful, the money and power inevitably changed him.
all the best urban
1 person likes this

@sid556 (30953)
• United States
30 Jun 11
I'm a Lennon fan and this article doesn't shock me much. For one thing it is one man's opinion...a man who worked with him for about a year. I actually never thought of slotting John Lennon into any one particular political slot. I have no doubt that his thinking and priorities were different in 1979 then they were in 71. The Vietnam war had ended, the peace rallies were done and over...it was a different world.
1 person likes this





