to be a professional idiot

Indonesia
August 7, 2011 11:46pm CST
Is it better to be a professional idiot, or placed with a wide smattering of knowledge to be?
4 people like this
5 responses
@gengeni (3308)
• Indonesia
12 Aug 11
Well it depends on what is needed. To impress enough to know half-off. I will, however, a reasonable / useful / very thorough response to a specific problem I'd rather a professional idiot.
@rifnee (1713)
• Indonesia
11 Aug 11
If you have a specialty, then you should play it too. But we all know is usually a bit modest about other things, so I can not imagine that one only knows about a topic of great decision and nothing to do other things!
• Indonesia
9 Aug 11
times is a real idiot so awesome that he gets through his expertise and access to know anything else. This is so because one can understand by concentration on the detail very well throughout. because the whole is included in detail as well as the detail throughout. that's a strange reality, yes.
• Indonesia
10 Aug 11
I just can not pick and choose as wide half-Knowing. I could never decide on a focus, so I'm just a lot of half-focus. Moreover, one would miss much if you is not his focus to wide angle. And there are so many interesting things in the world would be a waste not fiddle. Just as well I could always eat the same thing. I even believe I'm like a wide half-Knowing. Although it is sometimes difficult.
@najibdina29 (1309)
• Indonesia
8 Aug 11
Broad base, that means knowing a little of everything and nothing right. This is perfect for politicians and top managers. For normal people it is important to be a professional idiot, because businesses expect financially exploitable specialization. A company sets for a limited subject area specialist, who then more than sufficient to precisely this area knows.