Is there any scientific proof of the uniqueness of biometric features?
By kendedes2011
@kendedes2011 (2712)
Indonesia
August 15, 2011 10:27am CST
Due to the problem of induction can be drawn from a finite number of observations never universally valid scientific conclusions. It is now accepted in the logic of scientific research. Nevertheless, it is presented as proof that the same biometric features before. We are misinformed, or are there for the uniqueness of facial features, eyes, fingerprints, etc. other non-empirical evidence?
3 people like this
2 responses
@gengeni (3308)
• Indonesia
18 Aug 11
I once read an article about it:
One can not prove this statement, but it is now regarded as generally true, as yet could not find two same biometric data.
Theoretically, you can doubt all natural compound, because it may well have been always been true, what they say, but 100% can never prove it.
@dayangsumbi2010 (1724)
• Indonesia
16 Aug 11
There is only indirect (mathematical and empirical) evidence, since otherwise would have everyone on the planet can be measured. In addition, the whole science is out of the classical empirical mathematics!
Indirectly, however, it is mathematically demonstrable. Therefore, you MUST necessarily be different from the exterior (scientific derivation). Although there may be people who look similar, but the characteristics are always different. It is therefore to be regarded as proven. Whether the monitoring instruments are accurate enough to detect the differences, is another question.
