Why not 'men's studies?

@gengeni (3308)
Indonesia
August 23, 2011 10:58pm CST
In the social science section, there is the category: Women's Studies Home - All categories - Social Science - Women's Studies If only women better at everything as we are allowed to read every day, make 50 percent more high school(here) , landing only 30% in special schools, leaving only 20 percent without end, to live statistics about 6 years longer, only one-twentieth of all occupational deaths have, 4 times less often homeless, commit suicide five times less, Ministry of woman have her own .... ... etc, .... Then why are they still promoted heavily billionaire? This fits together but not at all? Even in this discussion forum, not a lot of special categories of men.
6 people like this
7 responses
• Indonesia
2 Sep 11
Exactly, we have to fight so slow for the equal rights of men. I do not want it in a shipwreck is, in the lifeboats, men & children first. But these statistics do not say anything.
• Indonesia
27 Aug 11
The reason is that women generally take too seriously, and want to thrash out any crap constantly collides with their emotional world of the evil reality. Mylot has created this section as a platform for their specific problems. This is to protect the men in the other categories, so we do not accidentally become entangled in the emotional debate.
@nakula2009 (2325)
• Indonesia
25 Aug 11
".... Then why are they still promoted heavily billionaire? This fits together but not at all? " Quite simply, because there's billions of dollars, which have to be spread among women. There are the tens of thousands of equality officers, who are all women and equality among only 100% owned understand women. Since there are tens of funding, the Girls' Day, an entire ministry, etc. But if Mrs. Schroeder wants to use only a small portion of the funds for the promotion of young, black woman, and then scream out loud and Co start a smear campaign.
@rifnee (1713)
• Indonesia
26 Aug 11
especially as the issues here are not the research, speculation, and most likely to sodnern something amusing. It seems to me you should at these questions and more fun - instead of just asking for trouble - find. Can discuss mau (ie you and / or women) then everything.
• Indonesia
26 Aug 11
"Women's Studies" is a poor translation of this term, which leads to misunderstandings. While gender studies have even started a "women's studies," but far include women's and men's studies. It's about the impact of gender on various aspects of life and the various sciences, eg the medicine, not only social and educational sciences. People see you look at the English-language Wikipedia page! The term "gender" refers to the social and cultural constructions of masculinity (s) and female (s). It is in "gender studies" is an interdisciplinary area of ??research with emphasis in social science and not a political movement for the enforcement of women's rights, even if it was co-founded by feminists. Women AND men research in this area. Women AND men are explored!
@najibdina29 (1309)
• Indonesia
25 Aug 11
There is no argument. Purely out of principle, it should also be a men's studies class, or be added sometime in the next thousand years. This has been something that is misogynistic in itself. Determined because some women want men to explore the psyche, for example, why do men wars, why men are less educated, why men are more aggressive, why they want to f*ck each prefer, why they can not do several things at once, and of course you want all the prejudices but finally clear up again or not?
• Chatsworth, California
24 Aug 11
I guess because women have been oppressed for so long? I don't agree with these "studies" classes. Punish the man for what he had done over 50yrs ago. He must learn about how horrible he is, how he doesn't understand ect. But the "oppressed" don't really need to hear about there "oppressor". Yes it probably is as stupid as it sounds. I'm a woman so I'm not defending "my own kind" It's really stupid we should just get rid of all those classes.