Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice David Prosser cleared of assault charges..
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 responses
@TheMetallion (1834)
• United States
27 Aug 11
As usual, things are not as you claim they are:
"The totality of the facts and the circumstances and all of the evidence that I reviewed did not support my filing criminal charges," Barrett said Thursday.
She did note, however, that varying accounts were given by witnesses - a group that would have included most of the justices and colleagues - and said that was common in cases with multiple witnesses. Barrett offered no commentary on the merits of the accusations against the two judges or on whether their conduct was fitting for justices in the state's highest court.
-http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/128389748.html
The special prosecutor made no finding as to who told truth or who lied. The special prosecutor concluded she didn't have enough evidence to file a prosecution.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Aug 11
The case was investigated by 4 liberal democrat investigative departments in Madison, WI. If there was a shred of evidence that this lie had any merit, they would have jumped at the chance to bring Prosser down.
In the end, there wasn't. So they passed it off to a Republican in a different county, so they could blame the Republican...and mindless people like you would be able to continue the lie.
Prosser didn't attack anyone. Accept the truth for once in your pathetic life.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
28 Aug 11
Right, and there wasn't even a shred of evidence that it ever happened. The lie from the left is out there though, so those who refuse to think for themselves will willingly and knowingly accept the lie as the truth.
In other words, they don't care how much "justice" Bradley lies, as long as the lie is against Justice Prosser.
2 people like this
@TheMetallion (1834)
• United States
27 Aug 11
It takes more than a "shred" of evidence to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Ms. Barrett indicated that witnesses gave conflicting accounts, which is a shred of evidence, but not enough to take to court. And you know it perfectly well.
your pathetic life.
Stay classy, Ted! Don't ever change.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Aug 11
Read Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" for the answer to your question.
2 people like this
