Should bigger and richer countries pay more for environmental damages?

That's true! It's the bigger and richer countries that are using up the most of the resources and should be responsible for how much is used and taken. Several big companies and organizations have tried to approach environmentally friendly ways to compensate all the damages they've caused to the environment. In my country, Australia, the prime minister is trying to implant a carbon tax to help tackle global warming and environmental damages. How ever many people are against this because this means paying a lot more in taxes while everything else becomes expensive. Right now, groceries to electricity bills have grown to such expensive prices and everyone is protesting against the carbon tax. People say that there's no point in saving the environment when it's going to be gone anyway.

For me they can't payed it because if the environment they destroy they pay it by the maker of the earth is Jehovah God.

You'll get no argument from me. User pays is good Capitalist sense, so make the Capitalists pay for what they use. But then again, just how much tax do the rich pay their goverments, and who actually runs their governments. Very little and they do. So the chances of getting the rich countries to chip in their fair share of the damage repair is very idealistic of us - abd probaby has a snowball's chance in hell of happening. Even now the Conservative Right and the large industrialists in my country are fighting tooth and nail to block the carbon tax our slightly left wing government wants to levy as the first step of environmental protection for the future. Lash