How come there is always protests when there is a Democrat President

You may be very mistaken. Many of the most notable protests were done under republican leadership and in time of war. Right now it is done under a democratic president, because we have the freedom of speech, and are showing our support for the matter at hand. No reflection on the president.

Were you involved in politics under Bush?? GW had many protests and certainly a lot of criticsim from everyone, even his own party.

Dude, protests ALWAYS happen. To even think that ANY president didn't have protesters would mean that you honestly believe we have had stretched of 4-12 years with no protests. That's just ridiculous.

I hate to tell you this but people have protested pretty much every president in this countries history. This is who we are, and how our country was set up to be. Protest are an extension of our form of government, and it is a health sign of a democracy.

You have a fascinating recollection of history. As tempting as it might be to accept your premise in order to quip that no one expects Republicant Presidents to be persuaded to morally or fiscally sound action, the fact is that for the last 40-50 years and longer, protests have occurred under every President.

The Wall Street Protesters have been embraced by Obama. Even though they are expecting others to donate sleeping bags, food, etc. so that don't have to support the "evil" capitalists, they dont seem to mind if someone else supports them to bring them what they need so they don't have to leave their protesting. Seems some Soros money has also been detected behind the protests. It's interesting to me that the media seems very supportive of these protesters who block bridges and aren't always so peaceful and those in power back them and say they are there because they are unhappy and are letting their feelings again the banks and corporations be known. This kind of protest is "good" and valid. However, more peaceful Tea Party protesters who are unhappy with the government regulations and fiscal policies that contributed to our economic mess are portrayed by the Democrats as "terrorists." Something about this doesn't fit. Both groups are expressing their dissatisfaction, but the propaganda machine only considers the protest they agree with as valid and the other one as invalid and disruptive, even though the Tea Party protests have not tried to storm any public buildings or bridges. They protest for an hour or two and go peacefully home, cleaning up their mess before they leave so that it won't have been a burden on their local goverment.